ImageImageImageImageImage

Amnesty

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

dukeknicksirish
Analyst
Posts: 3,163
And1: 2,447
Joined: Nov 02, 2010
 

Amnesty 

Post#1 » by dukeknicksirish » Thu Nov 3, 2011 3:10 am

So I'm curious... After Salmons is amnestied from this team, I was wandering which amnestied(probably will be) you guys will be interested in...

Also,

With a lineup of:
5. Cousins/ Whiteside
4. Thompson/ Hickson
3. Garcia/ Honeycutt / Green
2. Tyreke/ Thorton
1. Jimmer/ Isiah

What FA will the Kings go after, and how much cap space with and without Salmons amnestied...
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,033
And1: 243
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: Amnesty 

Post#2 » by longfellow44 » Thu Nov 3, 2011 4:49 am

the kings won't be using an amnesty on salmons, we traded down in the draft to get him, We view him as our starting SF and actually targeted him.
User avatar
ADoaN17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,044
And1: 312
Joined: Feb 11, 2010
   

Re: Amnesty 

Post#3 » by ADoaN17 » Thu Nov 3, 2011 6:25 am

I rather have Salmons and see what he can do for this team. The Kings have to lowest payroll, especially if Dally leaves. I don't see the need to amnesty anyone.
Image
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Amnesty 

Post#4 » by SacKingZZZ » Thu Nov 3, 2011 8:42 am

Geoff Petrie never wanted to trade Salmons in the first place, there's no way he uses it on Salmons. They clearly WANTED Salmons otherwise they wouldn't have done that trade.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Amnesty 

Post#5 » by KF10 » Thu Nov 3, 2011 9:50 am

Kings are going to keep Salmons until a permanent replacement at SF is figured out. I don't think he would be a target for amnesty. Like SKZZ said, Petrie wanted Salmons all along.

And you have to note that the Kings' SF production last year was absolutely horrid. There were only like, two other teams that had a worse situation than the Kings at that position. Salmons is a competent fit at SF.
dukeknicksirish
Analyst
Posts: 3,163
And1: 2,447
Joined: Nov 02, 2010
 

Re: Amnesty 

Post#6 » by dukeknicksirish » Thu Nov 3, 2011 9:26 pm

Ok so Salmons is safe.. Is there anybody that you would be interested in if they were amnestied?
User avatar
ADoaN17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,044
And1: 312
Joined: Feb 11, 2010
   

Re: Amnesty 

Post#7 » by ADoaN17 » Thu Nov 3, 2011 10:25 pm

dukeknicksirish wrote:Ok so Salmons is safe.. Is there anybody that you would be interested in if they were amnestied?

No. Garcia may have a bad contract but he is a leader on this team and if he can stay healthy he is a good backup.
Image
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Amnesty 

Post#8 » by KF10 » Fri Nov 4, 2011 1:41 am

dukeknicksirish wrote:Ok so Salmons is safe.. Is there anybody that you would be interested in if they were amnestied?


I'm not an expert about the whole amnesty thing myself but if amnesty is given within the span of two years, the Kings could watch and see if Salmons can integrate with the team for a whole season, if not, they could amnestied him after the season.

It's essentially "leasing" Salmons for a year if things goes wrong.

Return to Sacramento Kings