YogiStewart wrote:Ponchos wrote:YogiStewart wrote:
LOL.
how is that different that getting RGM to pool money and to elect Harry Palmer as our president and representative?
MLSE is a better organized version of that. you have the Teachers, represented by the ppl who run their pension plan, you have Tennenbaum, and you have other minority owners.
There's a gigantic frigging difference.
We'd elect Harry to be the president of overseeing a basketball team. Every single one of us would be interested in the day to day of the Raptors. The day Harry traded Bargs you'd have lawsuits and calls for him to step down.
The teachers elect people to run the OTPP to manage a god damned pension fund. Not a basketball team. They don't care about the Raptors. Even if an individual teacher cares about the Raptors they have absolutely no legal power to do anything about it.
This is why the NBA would never ever ever ever ever allow RealGM'ers to own a franchise, yet it is ok with them for the OTPP to own the Raps.
The NBA chooses who they want to own teams. Just ask Larry Ellison.
our argument has nothing to do with the labour talk anymore, but...you ever read over shareholder agreements? a cleverly crafted SO agreement takes away the micromanagement you speak of. this is how major corporations can make their shares public. but this is a separate discussion
There really is no argument. You asked why don't a large group of people pool their money and buy a team? The answer was given, they can't. The NBA chooses who it allows in the club, they screen their owners carefully. You seemed to think the pension plan was the same thing as a group of interested basketball fans... It isn't.
Now you're saying that the interested basketball people who each put forward a significant amount of money are going to give up their rights in a shareholders agreement? Holy moving target batman.












.jpg)













