The J Rocka wrote:theGreatRC wrote:cpfsf wrote:Hayes, but it would be nice if we could have both.
Why can't we have both?
Darko will probably go into a deep depression if he finds out he's coming off the bench and will demand to be released and go back home.
I bet Milicic would accept it. He’d still get 20-24 mpg, and would probably start in some games.
Foye wrote:It depends on the price tag.
For 2-3 mil $ per year I would gladly welcome him. However, we can't add another backup Center for 4-5 mil. We already have Darko and Pekovic making a combined 9+ mil $ per year. Can't afford another C getting money in that range unless we trade one of the other guys.
Then again is Chuck Hayes really better than Darko? He might be a better one-on-one defender than Darko is but that doesn't take away that most Centers can simply shoot/dunk/layup over him without any trouble in the paint. Darko can at least still contest shots with his size.
I would pass on the Hayes truck and wait for a bigger defensive minded C to become available. Hayes is going to cost a lot of money and won't have enough impact.
Not to mention that he's not the shotblocking presence we need.
Our players get so often burned on the wing by opposing players that take it to the hole that we need a shotblocker in the paint to make up for it.
Just wait for Andrew Bogut to become available. The Bucks will one day finally realize that they're in the middle of nowhere with Bogut. We have enough assets to acquire Bogut and he could really help our team on court while making some additional merchandising money, too.
4-5 million is more than fair. We have Pekovic, but it’s like watching a bear play basketball. Center is definitely a position we can afford to upgrade. Ideally pursue Bogut first, but I would go for Hayes if you can’t pull off a deal.
I really don't believe Hayes is even an option, even if Adelman is the coach.