Nate Robinson

[smith2373]

With the Thunder planning on buying him out, do you guys think it would be a good idea to be a backup to Jimmer or maybe start at PG?

[Nicky Nix Nook]

The Kings have absolutely no use for Nate Robinson. The only thing he brings to the table is offense, and we have more than enough guys who can score. He's honestly the last player we need on this team and if even if we did sign him for whatever reason, he'd be far from a starter.

[dozencousins]

Kings do not need Nate . If the Kings was to go after a point guard he better be a floor general or a game changer . Nate is neither of those .

[ADoaN17]

No way. No space on the team and he this team needs more leaders/mature people.

[DieHardKingsFan]

No need for Nate...we have another U-Dub guy, Isaiah Thomas, who can do all the things Nate can do but is a better floor leader.

[RIPskaterdude]

Yeah, already have a Nate Robinson in Isiah Thomas.

[City of Trees]

Between Jimmer, Thomas, and Thornton on the Roster the Kings have no need for Nate. Im cool.

[OGSactownballer]

NO.

[Krimzen]

It would have made some sense a year or two ago, but the team is loaded with young guards of all shapes/sizes/skillsets now. Would be especially dumb considering he has a rep as a knucklehead, which is not the sort of guy you want around our young players.

[Draino]

I LOVE Nate, but I don't want him on this team.