NBA rule changes, not good for Durant

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

Dantares
Head Coach
Posts: 6,504
And1: 2,755
Joined: Oct 08, 2003

NBA rule changes, not good for Durant 

Post#1 » by Dantares » Thu Dec 8, 2011 5:39 pm

NBA vice president of basketball operations Stu Jackson confirmed Wednesday that several new rule interpretations will be a point of emphasis for the league's referees when the regular season begins on Dec. 25.

"Rip-through" moves, in which an offensive player swings the ball into a defender's outstretched arm and then attempts a shot once he has created contact, will be considered non-shooting fouls if the contact begins before the offensive player starts his shooting motion.

Also, on drives to the basket, a shooting foul will be called only if contact occurs after the offensive player has begun his shooting motion, not after he has initiated his leap toward the basket.

"Certain types of contact involving the shooter were all being called in his favor," Jackson said. "It doesn't look good for the game. There was a strong feeling that those types of plays were creating an ill-advised reward for the shooter, often with three free throws."

The league will also make traveling in the post and on the perimeter a point of emphasis, with a player hopping off of and landing on the same foot viewed as an automatic violation. Referees will also consider locking or clamping an opponent's arm or hand under the basket while battling for a rebound and discontinued or hesitation dribbles as automatic violations.

Several rule changes will also be introduced, most to shorten the overall length of games and speed up the final minutes of a contest:

• Substitutions will only be allowed before the final free throw of any trip to the line that is not for a technical or flagrant foul.

• Two horns will be sounded 15 seconds apart after every timeout. Teams whose players are not moving toward the court as soon as the second horn sounds will receive a delay-of-game warning.

• Instant replay will be utilized only during full timeouts, not 20-second timeouts, when necessary.

• Whether a player's foot is on the three-point line or midcourt line will be determined by where it last touched the floor, meaning a player could have a toe on the three-point line but if he leans back on his heels before he releases the ball a successful shot would be deemed a three-pointer.

• The eight-second backcourt violation will occur when the shot clock reaches 15 seconds, rather than 16.

The last rule is necessary because the 24-second shot clock will now be equipped to show 10ths for the final five seconds and work as a "true" clock. From a technical standpoint, the old shot clock began with 24.9 seconds and expired with .9 left. Now the clock will switch from 24 to 23 seconds after .1 second has expired.

Jackson said a survey of coaches determined when the shot clock would break into 10ths.

"We didn't want to run them for the whole 24 seconds and the consensus was, from a strategy standpoint, that the final five seconds were the most valuable," he said. "Before, you could have two seconds left on the shot clock but you wouldn't know if it was 2.9 or 2.1. That makes a big difference."

Referees also will be hyper-vigilant about defenders making contact with offensive players when they're in the air and fully extended attempting to score. In most cases, expect that kind of foul to draw a Flagrant Level 2, which is two free throws, possession of the ball and the defender being ejected.

"That type of contact was a trend last season and it's really dangerous," Jackson said.


Its one of Durants favorite moves, no more easy points. The triple threat position no longer becomes as lethal as it used to be.
"No protectors here. No Lanterns. No Kryptonian. This world will fall like all the others."

Image
Krodis
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,876
And1: 599
Joined: Nov 28, 2009

Re: NBA rule changes, not good for Durant 

Post#2 » by Krodis » Thu Dec 8, 2011 5:53 pm

I'd say at most half of the rip-throughs will be converted to non-shooting fouls. He'll adjust.
User avatar
fallacy
RealGM
Posts: 10,496
And1: 607
Joined: Jan 11, 2010
       

Re: NBA rule changes, not good for Durant 

Post#3 » by fallacy » Thu Dec 8, 2011 8:27 pm

"if the contact begins before the offensive player starts his shooting motion."

It will still be called and will be up to the ref to determine when the contact was made. They're still fouls and Durant will still keep his defender in foul trouble. This will only take away a couple free throws every other game from him, not a big deal
**** Ron Artest
**** Marco Belinelli
Stephen Jackson aint bout dis lyfe
Patrick Beverly deserves to have his knee ripped to pieces
User avatar
BIG EDDIE
Rookie
Posts: 1,067
And1: 12
Joined: Sep 08, 2001
Location: Z

Re: NBA rule changes, not good for Durant 

Post#4 » by BIG EDDIE » Fri Dec 9, 2011 9:26 am

"Rip-through" moves, in which an offensive player swings the ball into a defender's outstretched arm and then attempts a shot once he has created contact, will be considered non-shooting fouls if the contact begins before the offensive player starts his shooting motion.

I think we have a different understanding of what the above sentence means.
To me, it means that most of KD's rip moves will still be shooting fouls in the following cases.
Defender streches his arms out to "check" Durant.
KD starts his shooting motion and THEN hits the defender's arms.
To me, this should be still a shooting foul, according to the above rule description.
Life may not be the party we hoped for but while we are here we might as well dance!
Dantares
Head Coach
Posts: 6,504
And1: 2,755
Joined: Oct 08, 2003

Re: NBA rule changes, not good for Durant 

Post#5 » by Dantares » Fri Dec 9, 2011 7:28 pm

BIG EDDIE wrote:"Rip-through" moves, in which an offensive player swings the ball into a defender's outstretched arm and then attempts a shot once he has created contact, will be considered non-shooting fouls if the contact begins before the offensive player starts his shooting motion.

I think we have a different understanding of what the above sentence means.
To me, it means that most of KD's rip moves will still be shooting fouls in the following cases.
Defender streches his arms out to "check" Durant.
KD starts his shooting motion and THEN hits the defender's arms.
To me, this should be still a shooting foul, according to the above rule description.


I think its pretty clear what it means and we all know durant scores 4-6 points from that move every game which makes his points per shot and TS% so great. He will only get it when the other team is in the penalty now, no more freebies at the FT line.
"No protectors here. No Lanterns. No Kryptonian. This world will fall like all the others."

Image
wizkid27
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 2,636
And1: 166
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Indianapolis
   

NBA rule changes, not good for Durant 

Post#6 » by wizkid27 » Fri Dec 9, 2011 9:23 pm

From a bball sense, I hate the move to the point that I wish it was a foul on the guys who try to pull it just because it is similar to flopping. From a thunder fan perspective, yes Durant probably benefitted from the move more than anyone so it hurts us.

Surely the rule is targeted directly at what Durant does, so if you're telling yourself "no, that's part of his shooting motion so it will all be the same", I think (and to a certain degree hope) that you're wrong.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder