ATTN: Rodney Stuckey wants 10mil

Han Solo · Post #61 » by **Han Solo** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:49 pm

Optms wrote:I almost want the FO to overpay and then cry about how unfair things are. Furthermore, Stucks isn't an idiot because he wants 10 million per. Why should he aim low when moronic management just might give into demands?

We aren't one of the franchises that bitches about ANYTHING - get your facts straight. We are also one of the only teams that turned a profit last year even when we sucked. The Pistons owner owns our arena also. Pistons are a great franchise. 3 rings isn't so bad is it?

Han Solo · Post #62 » by **Han Solo** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:51 pm

I think Stuckey would be an all-star on the Lakers. You put Stuckey on a team that's not in full-rebuild mode and he'll surprise you. I also think he'd be a good fit playing for Portland.

triplet1984 · Post #63 » by **triplet1984** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:57 pm

Hey Joe Dumars has CONSISTENTLY shown an extreme willingness to overpay for limited players so I don't blame him for trying to get.

Back to Stuckey, if he wants 10 million, tell him to either:

a) learn how to shoot long-range
or
b) learn how to run an offense

mid-post · Post #64 » by **mid-post** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:28 pm

Senchu wrote:ATTN: Rodney Stuckey thinks he is a Center!

nice.

coldgrip1 · Post #65 » by **coldgrip1** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:33 pm

Han Solo wrote:I think Stuckey would be an all-star on the Lakers. You put Stuckey on a team that's not in full-rebuild mode and he'll surprise you. I also think he'd be a good fit playing for Portland.

Stuckey an all star in the guard-crowded west? :lol:

About 30 other guards will be selected before Stuckey :lol:

Ballings7 · Post #66 » by **Ballings7** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:49 pm

Well, Stuckey certainly isn't horrible, but he isn't worth ten million a year... more like 6-7

Post #67 » by **City of Trees** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:51 pm

AND I WANNA BE A LITTLE BIT TALLER, WANNA BE A BALLER, WANNA HAVE A GIRL SO I CAN CALL HER...

Han Solo · Post #68 » by **Han Solo** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:53 pm

coldgrip1 wrote:
Han Solo wrote:I think Stuckey would be an all-star on the Lakers. You put Stuckey on a team that's not in full-rebuild mode and he'll surprise you. I also think he'd be a good fit playing for Portland.

Stuckey an all star in the guard-crowded west?

About 30 other guards will be selected before Stuckey

Stuckey would easily be a 20-5-5 guy on an up-tempo team. Last 10-12 games of the year - last year, the Pistons played him at the 2 and he averaged 25-5-5

Post #69 » by **City of Trees** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:55 pm

Han Solo wrote:
coldgrip1 wrote:
Han Solo wrote:I think Stuckey would be an all-star on the Lakers. You put Stuckey on a team that's not in full-rebuild mode and he'll surprise you. I also think he'd be a good fit playing for Portland.

Stuckey an all star in the guard-crowded west?

About 30 other guards will be selected before Stuckey

Stuckey would easily be a 20-5-5 guy on an up-tempo team. Last 10-12 games of the year - last year, the Pistons played him at the 2 and he averaged 25-5-5

So he gets 10 mill from a 10 game stretch? C'mon man! Kiss da Baby

Han Solo · Post #70 » by **Han Solo** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:00 pm

So he gets 10 mill from a 10 game stretch? C'mon man! Kiss da Baby

I don't think he's worth anything more than 7 million. I don't want him if he's asking for more. 4 years 30 million sounds fair. I just am saying he's not as bad as people are making him out to be on here.

contract · Post #71 » by **contract** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:02 pm

Han Solo wrote:Last 10-12 games of the year - last year, the Pistons played him at the 2 and he averaged 25-5-5

Did you learn nothing from the Charlie Villanueva signing? You can't pay a guy based on how well he performs during a limited stretch of games.

Han Solo · Post #72 » by **Han Solo** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:05 pm

contract wrote:
Han Solo wrote:Last 10-12 games of the year - last year, the Pistons played him at the 2 and he averaged 25-5-5

Did you learn nothing from the Charlie Villanueva signing? You can't pay a guy based on how well he performs during a limited stretch of games.

Stuckey is worth 7 million a year. I'd be fine with that. I think a backcourt of Brandon Knight / Rodney Stuckey could be very good.

karkinos · Post #73 » by **karkinos** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:07 pm

stuckey is worth MLE

princeofpalace · Post #74 » by **princeofpalace** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:01 pm

BeasleyTheBeast wrote:I remember in 2008 or 2009 Joe Dumars said he will take Rodney Stuckey over Derrick Rose.............

This is a blatant lie

Charsace · Post #75 » by **Charsace** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:09 pm

**** no.

whatchaknow · Post #76 » by **whatchaknow** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:12 pm

I like Stuckey's game and i think a lot of people underrate him since hes played on the Pistons who havent got much nat'l attention lately. I also think he is a sg who should play pg only in a pinch, so being on a team like Detroit who hasnt had a true pg the last few years has really put him in a tough position. I think he would have a much better year this year with Knight there if he were to re-up with them.

I would love stuckey in Portland as a 6th man but we dont have capspace. A S&T isnt much of a possibility unless the Pistons want to take a chance on Oden for a season (why would they?!?), otherwise we dont have much that we can trade for him.

Blkbrd671 · Post #77 » by **Blkbrd671** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:22 am

depending on what nick young gets will deterimine stuckeys value as i'd put them at the same level

Edrees · Post #78 » by **Edrees** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:27 am

considering the pistons used up all their free cap space to sign Charlie Villanueva and Ben Gordon, I say Pistons up Stuckey's offer and give him 12 mill

RoundMoundOfRebound · Post #79 » by **RoundMoundOfRebound** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:38 am

KingCuban wrote:This guy is horrible.

Not a fan at all.

I wouldnt be surprised if Dumars gives it to him tbh.

Dumars has made quite a few questionable decisions since the title. This would just be another.

Piston Pete · Post #80 » by **Piston Pete** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:00 am

I agree with that Stuckey would flourish with a more up-tempo team.