ImageImageImage

What do you think of the Bulls signing?

Moderators: KingDavid, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ

Heats_Finest
Banned User
Posts: 2,957
And1: 33
Joined: Jun 27, 2011

What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#1 » by Heats_Finest » Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:53 am

So it's official that the Bulls signed RIP Hamilton, and while I know he plugs up a hole for their offense. I'm actually happy that they've signed him. One of their biggest strengths against us is they have really strong wing defenders in Bogans/Brewer/Deng. But the signing of Hamilton means that Wade and Lebron will see much less of Bogans or Brewer on defense. While you may say that it'll make Wade a lot more tired, that's where our continuity comes into play with Battier. He can use all his energy on defense negating Hamiltons offense.

I'm actually pretty happy about it, Brewer and Bogans seem to have so much hustle and great defense, but now with Hamilton I think Wade and Lebron will score a tonne of buckets on the Bulls. + Rose doesn't like to pass the ball that often, so Hamiltons biggest strength, running off screens sort of is negated.

Do you guys think that this signing hurts us or helps us against Bulls?
Miamis3rdRing
Banned User
Posts: 10,050
And1: 131
Joined: Apr 08, 2010
Location: L.A.

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#2 » by Miamis3rdRing » Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:04 am

I do think Rip makes them a better team. They desperately need offense, and he's a good fit next to Rose because he doesn't really need the ball in his hands. Whether or not Rose will hit him with the pass every time is to be determined. Billups did a good job back in the day and he's not really a pass-first PG either.

Outside of Rose who do they have that can score? Boozer? Yeah right! That guy is awful. Can't wait for Bosh to completely outplay him once again. (Had to get in my Boozer jab in here somewhere)

Like you said though, Rip can't do as good of a job on Wade as Bogans/Brewer did. The less of them, the better for us.

It'll be a pain in the a** for Wade to chase Rip around, but that's why we have Battier. Miller and Jones if healthy can also be used in limited minutes though defense isn't really their specialty.

Overall, I still like us in a series against them.

Short version - I agree with basically everything you wrote.
User avatar
RealOffenSE
Sophomore
Posts: 218
And1: 13
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#3 » by RealOffenSE » Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:28 am

Heats_Finest wrote:So it's official that the Bulls signed RIP Hamilton, and while I know he plugs up a hole for their offense. I'm actually happy that they've signed him. One of their biggest strengths against us is they have really strong wing defenders in Bogans/Brewer/Deng. But the signing of Hamilton means that Wade and Lebron will see much less of Bogans or Brewer on defense. While you may say that it'll make Wade a lot more tired, that's where our continuity comes into play with Battier. He can use all his energy on defense negating Hamiltons offense.

I'm actually pretty happy about it, Brewer and Bogans seem to have so much hustle and great defense, but now with Hamilton I think Wade and Lebron will score a tonne of buckets on the Bulls. + Rose doesn't like to pass the ball that often, so Hamiltons biggest strength, running off screens sort of is negated.

Do you guys think that this signing hurts us or helps us against Bulls?


I dont know how you managed to twist the positives about RIP to the bulls into negatives. RIP is a lengthy defender, and I dont think hes a corpse yet. Based on the horrible defense I saw Bogans play on Wade in the playoffs, literally turning and giving wade a lane to the basket, I would argue RIP is an upgrade defensively for the starting lineup. We still have Brewer, and he is essentially in the same role, so I dont know how you would see less of him??? You said Rose doesnt like to pass much, so that negates RIP's offense. Rose was top ten in assists last year and he "did not pass much" because he does not have more players like RIP who create off the ball. I can only imagine adding a player like RIP means Rose would pass more. Plan to see Rose get more help this year, and yes, even from Boozer. Boozer can only play better compared to his horrible performance in the playoffs. The same for NOAH. I cant wait for the playoffs
BFRESH44
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 7,118
And1: 10,907
Joined: Mar 25, 2007
Location: Coral Gables

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#4 » by BFRESH44 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:35 am

Image
ninjabelly
Banned User
Posts: 2,622
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 29, 2011

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#5 » by ninjabelly » Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:53 am

obviously it hurts us, but im not scared, they need a good second scorer next to wade; i dont think rip can be that, plus i think wade can shut him down.
User avatar
MaliBrah
RealGM
Posts: 20,058
And1: 4,591
Joined: Feb 03, 2011
   

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#6 » by MaliBrah » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:00 am

ninjabelly wrote:obviously it hurts us, but im not scared, they need a good second scorer next to wade; i dont think rip can be that, plus i think wade can shut him down.


ahaha i think you meant next to rose. But yeah im not that scared of them. They seem to be certain n their board that their going to beat the heat come playoff time
Heats_Finest
Banned User
Posts: 2,957
And1: 33
Joined: Jun 27, 2011

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#7 » by Heats_Finest » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:13 am

RealOffenSE wrote:I dont know how you managed to twist the positives about RIP to the bulls into negatives. RIP is a lengthy defender, and I dont think hes a corpse yet. Based on the horrible defense I saw Bogans play on Wade in the playoffs, literally turning and giving wade a lane to the basket, I would argue RIP is an upgrade defensively for the starting lineup. We still have Brewer, and he is essentially in the same role, so I dont know how you would see less of him??? You said Rose doesnt like to pass much, so that negates RIP's offense. Rose was top ten in assists last year and he "did not pass much" because he does not have more players like RIP who create off the ball. I can only imagine adding a player like RIP means Rose would pass more. Plan to see Rose get more help this year, and yes, even from Boozer. Boozer can only play better compared to his horrible performance in the playoffs. The same for NOAH. I cant wait for the playoffs


On the point of Rose and passing, it's expected that a guy with the 2nd highest usage ratio (Who's a PG), would be in the top 10 in assists. You'd kind of expect that, but among his assist ratio, a true stat when comparing assists for point guards. He ranks 51 among all point guards, Mario Chalmers, Stuckey etc have higher assist ratios....

I don't mean to hate on the kid because he's an exceptional talent, just for the amount of touches per game he gets his assist ratio really isn't anything special.
User avatar
PowerBull
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,395
And1: 34
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: Austria
 

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#8 » by PowerBull » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:18 am

coolstorybro wrote:
Like you said though, Rip can't do as good of a job on Wade as Bogans/Brewer did. The less of them, the better for us.

It'll be a pain in the a** for Wade to chase Rip around, but that's why we have Battier. Miller and Jones if healthy can also be used in limited minutes though defense isn't really their specialty.


So (more) Hamilton means less Brewer BUT (more of) Battier doesn't mean less Wade? makes sense. This works both ways. And as somebody else mentioned Rip doesn't do a bad job on Wade on defense.
RatherUnique
Analyst
Posts: 3,119
And1: 1,474
Joined: Oct 29, 2011

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#9 » by RatherUnique » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:35 am

Wade completely wrecked hamilton in their last playoff matchup in '06

He's certainly an upgrade to Bogans, however
User avatar
MartyCONLONNN
Analyst
Posts: 3,140
And1: 2,506
Joined: Dec 01, 2009

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#10 » by MartyCONLONNN » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:44 am

I think it's as good a signing as us signing Battier. Both are good not perfect fits that should produce well in their systems from the get-go, both are savvy veteran leaders, and both will take some pressure away from their respective team's stars.

And although Rip provides a more practical upgrade for a position of need for Chi, which will make them a better team no doubt, the notion of it putting them over the top of our team's upgrade is negated in a sense by the fact that (and sorry RealOffense, but no) RIp at this stage will not be as aggressive of a defender on the floor as Bogans was, and that's apart from the fact that Wade will be able to post Rip up with ease. The negation goes even further IMO with the fact that chasing Rip around won't be an issue for Wade, because we will almost certainly put Battier in charge of the chasing.

So although it's a solid solid move for Chicago, when it comes to a Heat matchup, our own addition is as good as an answer as you can get. IMO the key to a Bulls Heat series will be injuries... On the Bulls board I see a lot of pridefully ignorant posts from some who refuse to give us credit about how Boozer was injured and so was Noah, and Rose tweaked his ankle etc. and that's really why they lost. Right. A lot of this without any acknowledgment that Haslem was on one leg and played his first game in almost the whole season in game 2 (amazing). And that Miller was completely broken by then, also played an utterly useless Bibby out there (something like that will not fly again this year). So yeah even with them and us at full strength, we still wouldn't really know the outcome. Injuries and the way they affect chemistry especially in this jampacked season will be an even bigger factor than usual I predict. One thing is for sure these two are by a fair margin the creme of the crop in the East, and if/when we meet in the playoffs it promises to be a grueling series with us on top by a slimmer margin... i'm thinking late 90s Knicks Heat ugly, at least that's how it's shaping up in my head lol
Miamis3rdRing
Banned User
Posts: 10,050
And1: 131
Joined: Apr 08, 2010
Location: L.A.

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#11 » by Miamis3rdRing » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:21 am

PowerBull wrote:
So (more) Hamilton means less Brewer BUT (more of) Battier doesn't mean less Wade? makes sense. This works both ways. And as somebody else mentioned Rip doesn't do a bad job on Wade on defense.


Are Deng's minutes going to come down this season come playoff time? No, that wouldn't be smart.

Is Rip Hamilton going to play 19 mpg in the playoff's like Bogans did? No, that wouldn't be smart. He'll play significantly more than that.

This is what happens when you add a superior starter. The minutes of the guys on the bench suffer. Now if you want to bench Korver and just play Brewer the minutes left over by Deng and Rip be my guest. You then have no shooters.

If the Heat get Chauncey Billups what happens? Chalmers and Cole lose potential playing time.

If the Heat get Jason Richardson then he'll play behind Wade. He won't take Wade's minutes but rather his back-up's.

Why would we reduce Wade's minutes come playoff time and give them to an inferior player in Battier (Comparatively speaking)? Miller, Jones, and House will lose playing time - not Wade.

Oh and Rip can't defend Wade. This isn't 2005. Check the recent match-up's.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 2=wadedw01

I'll steer away from this topic since nothing good ever comes from interactions between Heat and Bulls fans. See you in the 2nd round of the playoff's (1st seed Heat vs. 4th seed Bulls).
Chosen01
RealGM
Posts: 17,107
And1: 534
Joined: May 08, 2009
 

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#12 » by Chosen01 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:30 am

Doesn't matter.I'm confident enough to believe the Heat will trump them again, and I'm sure a few Bulls fans feel the same way,with a healthy Miller, Haslem, the unlikelihood that Wade has another subpar series against them and the fact that they still have Boozer who is a terrible defender,I like our chance to once again beat them in 5 unless Rose really improves.

In fact you can argue that the signing of Battier was almost as big as Rip( simply because everyone besides the Big 3 are somewhat scrubs besides a healthy Haslem,Miller) who's able to contribute and play lock down defense and 3s at a 37%+ clip.
User avatar
vanhowell
Senior
Posts: 728
And1: 687
Joined: May 14, 2011
   

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#13 » by vanhowell » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:13 am

Acquiring RIP is a decent addition for them but they still can't beat us in a 7 game series :wink:
To succeed, attitude is equally as important as ability.
User avatar
jmbflame21
General Manager
Posts: 9,900
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 08, 2008
Location: Tallahassee, FLA

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#14 » by jmbflame21 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:54 am

LOL Bulls still gunna get stomped in the ECF!!!!
Image Image
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#15 » by Cliff Levingston » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:34 pm

coolstorybro wrote:
PowerBull wrote:
So (more) Hamilton means less Brewer BUT (more of) Battier doesn't mean less Wade? makes sense. This works both ways. And as somebody else mentioned Rip doesn't do a bad job on Wade on defense.


Are Deng's minutes going to come down this season come playoff time? No, that wouldn't be smart.

Is Rip Hamilton going to play 19 mpg in the playoff's like Bogans did? No, that wouldn't be smart. He'll play significantly more than that.

This is what happens when you add a superior starter. The minutes of the guys on the bench suffer. Now if you want to bench Korver and just play Brewer the minutes left over by Deng and Rip be my guest. You then have no shooters.

That's probably what would end up happening. Korver really isn't a good player, he's just a good shooter, that's it. Rip can do just about everything Korver can do and much more offensively while being a superior defender.

Cliff Levingston would expect a base rotation like this in the playoffs:

1. Rose [38], Watson [10]
2. Hamilton [32], Brewer [16]
3. Deng [38], Brewer [10]
4. Boozer [32], Gibson [16]
5. Noah [32], Asik [16]

Hamilton is a big upgrade over Bogans as he adds so much more offensively, even if he isn't his old self. Bogans was completely worthless offensively outside of being able to shoot a wide open 3.

However, none of that matters if Noah and Boozer are hurt and play as poorly as they did in the series last year.
GameTime_3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,480
And1: 4,051
Joined: Sep 20, 2004
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#16 » by GameTime_3 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:03 pm

Its a decent addition for the Bulls. If we didn't get battier, I would be a bit more worried since Wade would have to chase him around but that won't be the case down the stretch as I see Wade defending Battier chasing him around with Wade man to man on Rose. What thing I don't like about the pickup for them is Rip doesn't have a great 3 ball and relies in his mid range, something that Rose also uses. The perfect 2 next to Rose was Ben Gordan. Someone who could shoot lights out and didn't need to dribble much.
User avatar
Lauri_Legend
Analyst
Posts: 3,017
And1: 1,667
Joined: Dec 13, 2010
 

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#17 » by Lauri_Legend » Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:07 pm

Cliff Levingston wrote:
coolstorybro wrote:
PowerBull wrote:
However, none of that matters if Noah and Boozer are hurt and play as poorly as they did in the series last year.


Exactly. Rip or no Rip, Chicago cant get anywhere if Booz and Noah are injured.
Admin of DieHardChicagoBullsFans: https://www.facebook.com/DieHardChicagoBullsFans
CablexDeadpool
Head Coach
Posts: 7,006
And1: 1,686
Joined: May 04, 2011

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#18 » by CablexDeadpool » Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:20 pm

rip is a chucker now and unless he gonna go back to being ray allen with the midrange shot, then I am not worried. Lately he's been an on the dribble player.


That means the ball isn't in Rose's hands and Rose will chuck up shots. Rose was better the year before his MVP season. Now he's thinks he can shoot 3s at a 40 percent clip when he's really just a kobe like chucker.

If Rip running around like Ray Allen then yeah it's a wrap if Boozer can play defense and not look like a b****.
ken6199 wrote:A Rocket's loss really brought out the best of people. It makes me realize this forum is filled with jobless scumbags with their only intention to come hate the team they hate and realize their anger from their life/job/wife/kids or whatever.


:lol:
User avatar
orangeparka
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 187
Joined: Apr 23, 2010

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#19 » by orangeparka » Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:20 pm

PowerBull wrote:
coolstorybro wrote:
Like you said though, Rip can't do as good of a job on Wade as Bogans/Brewer did. The less of them, the better for us.

It'll be a pain in the a** for Wade to chase Rip around, but that's why we have Battier. Miller and Jones if healthy can also be used in limited minutes though defense isn't really their specialty.


So (more) Hamilton means less Brewer BUT (more of) Battier doesn't mean less Wade? makes sense. This works both ways. And as somebody else mentioned Rip doesn't do a bad job on Wade on defense.


Nah, not really. Battier can technically come in for PG minutes (with Wade/LeBron moving there) as well, while Hamilton will take 2/3 minutes.


On-topic, it's definitely a good move by the Bulls. There weren't many good SGs in FA, so Rip is decent. Although, he turns 34 in like a couple of months, and he's a shell of his former self. He's not that great of a floor-spacer either... but nevertheless he's an upgrade over Keith.
Image
User avatar
Tim_Hardawayy
RealGM
Posts: 30,449
And1: 10,024
Joined: Sep 17, 2008

Re: What do you think of the Bulls signing? 

Post#20 » by Tim_Hardawayy » Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:33 pm

Noah and Boozer did play in the playoffs. I understand saying they weren't at 100%, but as the saying goes, nobody is 100% at that time of the year. I'd wager Wade wasn't 100% in the Bulls series, no matter what he wants to say, and he's more valuable to our team than Noah or Boozer is to Chicago. And Haslem/Miller clearly weren't 100%, and they were our 4th/5th best players. We had to go pretty much the whole entire season without their help.

Return to Miami Heat