ImageImage

Game 14: Super Bowl I Revisited

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,708
And1: 15,235
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: Game 14: Super Bowl I Revisited 

Post#681 » by rilamann » Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:40 pm

Newz wrote:
You were bringing up time of possession to try and prove something. Time of Possession isn't dictated only by your defenses performance. If our offense stayed on the field longer, it wouldn't have been as lopsided.



Don't even bother LP,our defense is the worst defense ever.

Granted you'd think you would win holding a team to 12pts thru 3 and a half qtrs but we still have to put all the blame on the D,it wouldn't be the Realmgm Packers board if we didn't.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
beyond_the_arc
Starter
Posts: 2,152
And1: 54
Joined: Jul 10, 2005

Re: Game 14: Super Bowl I Revisited 

Post#682 » by beyond_the_arc » Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:42 pm

rilamann wrote:


When your defense is on the field for 6+ minutes and then offense goes 3 and out you don't do your defense any favors obviously.


The Packers offense went 3 and out only once, how many time does that need to be repeated?
Postby SubyWill on Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:53 pm

Magic fan checking in, holy **** Harris is legit. Your GM should be fired.


No ****.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,708
And1: 15,235
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: Game 14: Super Bowl I Revisited 

Post#683 » by rilamann » Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:48 pm

beyond_the_arc wrote:
rilamann wrote:


When your defense is on the field for 6+ minutes and then offense goes 3 and out you don't do your defense any favors obviously.


The Packers offense went 3 and out only once, how many time does that need to be repeated?


I was using the first KC possession and then our first possession as the example.

With that said the offense didn't do the defense any favors today,we might have only went ''3 & out'' once but we didn't really have any long consistent drives other than the we got our first TD on.


The defense didn't play well but I don't get how some of you can put all the blame on our defense today.

And who cares,for a lack of a better way to put it the Packers ''didn't even play hard'' today.The Packers looked disinterested and like they just wanted to get this game over with.Sure they would have liked to get a win,I don't think they went saying ''let's just lose this one'' but the intensity was deff not there.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****

Return to Green Bay Packers