ImageImage

Packers/Kitties II Lead up

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,193
And1: 55,705
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#1 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:36 pm

McCarthy reported that several players who were hurt may return to practice this week and could play.


WR Greg Jennings may practice on Wednesday. Same with OT Bryan Bulaga. McCarthy's hope is to play Chad Clifton against the Lions to see whether he can help in the playoffs.


DE Ryan Pickett is taking some tests today to see if he can return to the practice field. RB James Starks will be hard-pressed to practice on Wednesday, which means he's probably doubtful.


McCarthy said he is going for 15-1. He wants to sweep the division. He didn't guarantee that he wouldn't rest anybody, but his message is that the Packers aren't going to let up against the Lions Sunday.

I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
an_also
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,268
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2008

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#2 » by an_also » Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:39 pm

Play rodgers a quarter. Maybe a half.
User avatar
Wooderson
RealGM
Posts: 13,180
And1: 5,906
Joined: Mar 03, 2008

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#3 » by Wooderson » Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:44 pm

Deactivate all current player and sign Favre + a collection of the worst offensive lineman you can find and let Suh bury Favre 6 feet under Lambeau.

Renovation complete.
UWM_Brew_Buck
Analyst
Posts: 3,129
And1: 898
Joined: Jan 26, 2009
Location: Not in the EMS Building
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#4 » by UWM_Brew_Buck » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:14 pm

I don't want to see Rodgers play a snap in a meaningless game against a dirty Lions team.
an_also
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,268
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2008

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#5 » by an_also » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:16 pm

McCarthy wants Clifton to play on sunday
“I want to see him play. I want to see him play in the game,” said McCarthy, who was then asked if that was for his own comfort level as a head coach.

“And for him to be comfortable. Chad has played a lot of football for us. Chad’s an All-Pro left tackle. The call he needs to answer is his own. The feedback has been very good throughout the rehab, and I just want to see him take the next step. More importantly, he needs to get out there in live action.”
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,902
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#6 » by Bernman » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:42 pm

As far as I know, it's unproven that a team will perform worse after a couple bye weeks. What I do know is that a team will perform worse without their MVP and the league's all-time highest rated QB. Therefore Rodgers shouldn't play next week.

By the same token nobody among the team's more valuable players or those who have a re-injury risk should play either.

However, that doesn't apply to Clifton because between his age and long-term injury we don't know what caliber of an offensive lineman he is anymore without seeing him during actual game action. Just look what happened to Mark Tauscher last year subsequent to injury problems. He fell off a cliff. Don't want to find out the same has happened to Clifton after digging a hole in a playoff game. I support McCarthy's decision here.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,193
And1: 55,705
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#7 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:16 am

Clifton absolutely has to play a half at least.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,571
And1: 29,606
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#8 » by paulpressey25 » Tue Dec 27, 2011 3:00 pm

Bernman wrote:As far as I know, it's unproven that a team will perform worse after a couple bye weeks.


I don't have empirical evidence for it, but the teams that usually get upset in the playoffs are the ones who clinch everything a couple weeks early and then use subs for two or three of the last regular season games.

We don't have that situation as the Bear game was must win and we played all our starters. I'd still play Rodgers a quarter though to keep him going in outdoor conditions at Lambeau.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,193
And1: 55,705
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#9 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Dec 27, 2011 3:40 pm

With 46 active players you can't rest all the starters like you can in the preseason. But Rodgers absolutely has to sit most of the game. Matthews too. And Woodson. Otherwise just keep rotating guys in and out. Sounds like Starks will be out again, not good. Grant has played well but if he goes down and Starks is still hurt in two weeks.... I'd say go with Saine much of the game.

New Orleans I believe rested guys 2 years ago and won. Indy has rested guys and lost early. It just seems as if the teams that are playing well going into the playoffs have the best shot, as we did last year. I just don't want to go in having lost 2 of the last 3, even if one of them was planned.

Then again with our offensive weapons there's no reason Flynn can't have a great game.

I really don't want to see Detroit win for the first time in 20 years here.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,571
And1: 29,606
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#10 » by paulpressey25 » Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:42 pm

Seems like the national media is enjoying stirring the pot on Brees v. Rodgers for MVP.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#11 » by Newz » Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:44 pm

If Brees wins MVP over Rodgers, that would be the lulz.

He has him in nothing besides bulk yardage because he was like 125 more attempts. Rodgers pwns everyone in yardage per attempt.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#12 » by LUKE23 » Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:46 pm

It shouldn't even be a discussion. The yard record is getting way more play than it should have. It's a volume record. YPA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> total passing yards.

Rodgers currently has the best QB rating all-time, and is leading Brees by a healthy 14 in that category, with more wins, over one more YPA, and 7.5 TD/INT vs. Brees' 3.15 TD/INT. In reality, if people are objective, Rodgers should win this unanimously. The only thing Brees has done better than Rodgers this year is accuracy, and it's 70.7 to 68.3, with a shorter YPA.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,475
And1: 13,295
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#13 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:52 pm

LUKE23 wrote:It shouldn't even be a discussion. The yard record is getting way more play than it should have. It's a volume record. YPA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> total passing yards.

Rodgers currently has the best QB rating all-time, and is leading Brees by a healthy 14 in that category, with more wins, over one more YPA, and 7.5 TD/INT vs. Brees' 3.15 TD/INT. In reality, if people are objective, Rodgers should win this unanimously. The only thing Brees has done better than Rodgers this year is accuracy, and it's 70.7 to 68.3, with a shorter YPA.

Last week put to rest the people who say its his weapons. Well, his all-pro WR was out and his RBs were hurt or non existent. Granted it is still a good offense put not as stupid as it normally is and puts it on par with Brees's. It definitely helps Rodgers went all-madden with his best guy out.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#14 » by LUKE23 » Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:54 pm

Even if people were using that, do we even legitimately have more weapons than NO, especially counting RB's? I'd say it's pretty close. Our WR's are better, but theirs are very good, they have probably the 2nd best TE in the league, and a stable of three good RB. We have nobody like Sproles, for instance.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,193
And1: 55,705
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#15 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:57 pm

Capers comments:

(What are your areas of concern) - "Things that we need to make improvement on is our run defense. Run defense is as much team defense as anything. It’s like putting a glove on and everything has to fit together in terms of gap control, leverage on the ball, tackling. I’ll give their running back credit in terms of many times they bled us for too many yards, where we’d make a hit a yard or two from the line of scrimmage and it would come out of there as a 5-yard gain. So I know we can play the run a lot better than what we did yesterday."

(Was it just a matter of missing DE Ryan Pickett) - "Well, I don’t know that totally. Now we certainly think that Ryan’s one of our better run players. He’s a big, physical guy that’s pretty disciplined, a good technician, but we can play better. We came out of the Kansas City game and I looked back, and they would have had — you take the reverse and the 15-yarder at the end of the game away, and they would have had less than 100 yards rushing. Even with those two plays, they were like 3.6 per rush. So I was fairly encouraged after that game."

(What did you think of OLB Vic So'oto's production) - "He got more playing time yesterday. Again, as we move along that’s a week to week thing based on who we’re playing. He played more yesterday. You saw the last series, we had Jamari Lattimore in there. We played more people."

(Are you desperate to find a pass rusher on the right side) - "Vic’s a young guy. Anytime we have a chance to give him an opportunity, we’d like to give him an opportunity. With these young guys, what I always tell them is you have to make the most of your opportunities and make it hard for us not to get you on the field. He did a couple good things. He’s still very raw in some areas."

I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,193
And1: 55,705
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#16 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:06 pm

"Someone is going to ask this question so I am going to answer it before it's asked," Payton said. "Typically, would I be throwing it there? The answer would be probably not. In fact, the answer would be 'I wouldn't be.' But I thought it was appropriate that we get the record. And we did it. We have a ton of respect for Falcons coach Mike [Smith], his staff and his players. It seemed like the right thing to do. I felt real good about the decision."

I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 35,778
And1: 11,659
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#17 » by MikeIsGood » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:11 pm

It seemed like the right thing to do, even though you're going to break it next week anyways.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#18 » by Newz » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:15 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Even if people were using that, do we even legitimately have more weapons than NO, especially counting RB's? I'd say it's pretty close. Our WR's are better, but theirs are very good, they have probably the 2nd best TE in the league, and a stable of three good RB. We have nobody like Sproles, for instance.


It's really tough. I think Graham is probably the best 'weapon' between both teams, but a healthy Jennings is very close or just as good. Our WRs/TEs 2-7 or whatever number you want to use are probably overall better though.

They have us whipped pretty good at RB. Sproles on his own has been a massive factor in the passing game. His versatility to run, then split out wide, etc. has been a great addition for them.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,134
And1: 8,858
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#19 » by LikeABosh » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:30 pm

LUKE23 wrote:It shouldn't even be a discussion. The yard record is getting way more play than it should have. It's a volume record. YPA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> total passing yards.

Rodgers currently has the best QB rating all-time, and is leading Brees by a healthy 14 in that category, with more wins, over one more YPA, and 7.5 TD/INT vs. Brees' 3.15 TD/INT. In reality, if people are objective, Rodgers should win this unanimously. The only thing Brees has done better than Rodgers this year is accuracy, and it's 70.7 to 68.3, with a shorter YPA.


Rodgers is also coming off the 2nd longest winning streak in league history.

And I don't understand the argument about Rodgers having a bad game in KC. Brees has had terrible games at Tampa and at St. Louis.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Packers/Kitties II Lead up 

Post#20 » by Balls2TheWalls » Tue Dec 27, 2011 6:25 pm

Aaron Rodgers has 0 multi-interception games. Brees has 4.

The best stat I saw was that Rodgers has 39 more touchdowns than interceptions, and that 39 touchdowns is more than any QB outside of Brees has thrown overall.

He is just the best QB in the league, period.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.

Return to Green Bay Packers