ImageImageImageImageImage

ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the Cubs

Moderator: JaysRule15

polo007
General Manager
Posts: 9,334
And1: 3,030
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the Cubs 

Post#1 » by polo007 » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:25 pm

http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/po ... rebuilding

The Toronto Blue Jays seem to be the best matchup for the Cubs in a Garza deal. After just missing out on Japanese starter Yu Darvish and watching left-hander John Danks re-sign with the White Sox, the Blue Jays best chance to compete would be to acquire Garza before the start of the season.

Toronto’s No. 1 pick from 2010, right-hander Deck McGuire, will be the focal point of any negotiations between the Cubs and Jays. The 22-year-old pitcher was a combined 9-5 at three different minor-league levels in 2011. The Blue Jays are convinced he’s near major-league ready.

The Cubs will also inquire about the availabilities of left-handed pitcher Justin Nicolino and power-hitting outfielder Jake Marisnick. Nicolino, a 20-year-old pitcher, was 6-2 with a 1.33 ERA at two minor league levels last season. He allowed just 39 hits in 61 innings. Marisnick is considered a five-tool prospect and hit 14 homers at the lower-A level last year.

The Cubs, who have no great agenda to trade Garza, are also preparing to talk to his agent about a long-term deal. So far they don’t like where the trade talks are going.
User avatar
Homer Jay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,494
And1: 674
Joined: Nov 30, 2003

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#2 » by Homer Jay » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:31 pm

I would do McGuire and Marisnick for Garza if we already had a team friendly extension planned out for him. I'm not as high on McGuire as I was a year ago (Surpassed by Syndergaard already), and Marisnick is a nice prospect but we still have Rasmus and Gose.

No D'Arnaud, Syndergaard, Nicolino, Hutchison and only one of Gose/Marisnick and I would be happy. Garza is a proven AL East pitcher.
Image
User avatar
wbbfan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 926
And1: 15
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Location: Drinking your milkshake.

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#3 » by wbbfan » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:44 pm

That's a strong price but one Id pay if it seemed like we'd be able to get him extended to a reasonable sum.
Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius.
LBJSeizedMyID
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,547
And1: 96
Joined: Jul 22, 2009

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#4 » by LBJSeizedMyID » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:48 pm

If the Jays are interested in competing this year, they'd make the trade only for lower level prospects. I doubt they'd part with that many AA/AAA level prospects.
User avatar
baulderdash77
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,579
And1: 235
Joined: Jun 12, 2003
     

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#5 » by baulderdash77 » Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:27 am

If the Jays are linked to it in the media, it isn't happening.

I would be thrilled with Garza though. He really is a good pitcher and is proven in the AL East.
Image
User avatar
Skin Blues
Veteran
Posts: 2,625
And1: 872
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#6 » by Skin Blues » Sat Dec 24, 2011 1:56 am

You want to watch 30+ games worth of him frothing up saliva in his mouth and spitting it out? Grosses me out, and I only probably watch one of his starts per season.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,309
And1: 14,334
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#7 » by dagger » Sat Dec 24, 2011 2:04 am

Supposedly, for Gio Gonzales, we were offering second tier prospects only.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
vaff87
RealGM
Posts: 23,953
And1: 70,948
Joined: Oct 22, 2003
         

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#8 » by vaff87 » Sat Dec 24, 2011 2:18 am

dagger wrote:Supposedly, for Gio Gonzales, we were offering second tier prospects only.


Good. Since when did guys like Gio Gonzalez become worth the package the Nats gave up? If that's what it takes to get a decent starting pitcher these days, the Jays are much better off letting their prospects develop.
User avatar
Wally West
Starter
Posts: 2,312
And1: 329
Joined: Jun 30, 2008

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#9 » by Wally West » Sat Dec 24, 2011 4:01 am

To acquire Matt Garza, the only prospects I wouldn't give up for him would be D'arnaud, Gose and Syndergaard. Everybody else could be had at the right price.
Want: Trae Young, Michael Porter Jr., DeAndre Ayton, Jaren Jackson Jr, Marvin Bagley III, Mohamad Bamba, Shai Gilgeous- Alexander, Elie Okobo, Jevon Carter
BobbyBoy
Banned User
Posts: 263
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 25, 2011

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#10 » by BobbyBoy » Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:07 am

Shouldnt give up much because I dont think he is a number 2 pitcher, but he is a number 3
BobbyBoy
Banned User
Posts: 263
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 25, 2011

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#11 » by BobbyBoy » Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:25 am

I think they jays should sign Edwin Jackson too.

Rotation: Romero
Garza
Morrow
Jackson
Alvarez/drabek/everyone else battling for the position
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#12 » by flatjacket1 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:48 am

Gosh I hope not.

If it takes anything more than 2 B level prospects I'm out.

FIP is higher than Morrows, hes not worth all that much. Also don't forget the "AL East effect"

I'd rather wait for Noah (The guy in our system who can hit triple digits on the radar gun)
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
User avatar
Kurtz
RealGM
Posts: 15,568
And1: 16,489
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#13 » by Kurtz » Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:16 am

flatjacket1 wrote:Gosh I hope not.

If it takes anything more than 2 B level prospects I'm out.

FIP is higher than Morrows, hes not worth all that much. Also don't forget the "AL East effect"

I'd rather wait for Noah (The guy in our system who can hit triple digits on the radar gun)


Garza averaged a 3 WAR when pitching in the Al East for 3 years. Morrow has averaged a 1.5 WAR during the last 2.

Also, I don't think he'd be blocking Noah, given that we have 3 starting rotation spots wide open at this point.
Image
User avatar
hyper316
RealGM
Posts: 14,749
And1: 10,033
Joined: Dec 23, 2006
   

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#14 » by hyper316 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:25 am

i like garza, proven arm in the AL East with success.

Romero
Garza
Morrow
---
--- (Alvarez, Cecil, McGowan, Drabek)

Garza would be a nice consolation prize after not winning Darvish. Cubs are in total rebuild mode, so they are willing to trade Garza. The only thing is the price it will cost
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#15 » by flatjacket1 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:31 am

Kurtz wrote:Garza averaged a 3 WAR when pitching in the Al East for 3 years. Morrow has averaged a 1.5 WAR during the last 2.

Also, I don't think he'd be blocking Noah, given that we have 3 starting rotation spots wide open at this point.


If you use Fangrapghs WAR, Morrow averaged 3.55 WAR/year in the AL East and Garza averaged 2.53 WAR/yea in the AL East.

1. Pitcher Value: fWAR relies totally on FIP, making it a defense-independent metric, while rWAR adds in defensive runs saved as well.


I think Fangraphs is more accurate when it comes to pitcher WAR tbh.

A package for Garza could easily mean we part ways with either Noah or a Noah level prospect, I'm just saying giving up 2 of those + another prospect isn't worth Garza.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
BobbyBoy
Banned User
Posts: 263
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 25, 2011

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#16 » by BobbyBoy » Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:56 am

I only like a garza deal if we trade 1 b+ prospect and a b prospect. I still think AA could do better, like Matt Cain, even though it would cost a lot more.
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 548
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#17 » by -MetA4- » Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:02 am

Garza isn't going to happen. A GM that places an incredible amount of emphasis on value isn't going to pay a premium for a pitcher who has only 2 years of control.
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#18 » by flatjacket1 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:08 am

BobbyBoy wrote:I only like a garza deal if we trade 1 b+ prospect and a b prospect. I still think AA could do better, like Matt Cain, even though it would cost a lot more.


Just some food for thought, but D'Arnaud and Gose according to "Minor League Ball" (John Sickels).

Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.

1) Travis D'Arnaud, C, Grade B+: Borderline A-: He would be an A- or maybe even an A if he was more effective at throwing out runners and struck out less often, but he can really hit and is still a superior prospect even with those weaknesses.

9) Anthony Gose, OF, Grade B: Other people will probably rank him higher due to his tools. He's made a lot of progress, but his hitting approach remains quite raw and the strikeout rate still bothers me. Made big strides refining his defense and baserunning. Grade A tools, Grade C+ skills, makes him a strong Grade B overall.


http://www.minorleagueball.com/2011/11/ ... s-for-2012

I would do it for two level B prospects too but don't toss it around like its nothing, that's significant value for a Morrow type pitcher. I would add a level C prospect too or possible Ben Francisco or Raja as a sweetener.

I would offer:
A.J. Jimenez
Deck McGuire
Cooper
Raja Davis

For
Matt Garza

That's just my opinion, feel free to bash it. I'm not professional. I would also be content with sitting this one out. Garza is a great pitcher, but at the same time I have a feeling the price won't be right. Whatever happens, happens I guess.

-MetA4- wrote:Garza isn't going to happen. A GM that places an incredible amount of emphasis on value isn't going to pay a premium for a pitcher who has only 2 years of control.


I never noticed only 2 years of control, thanks for bringing that up. I think sitting out here looks like the best option.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
BobbyBoy
Banned User
Posts: 263
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 25, 2011

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#19 » by BobbyBoy » Thu Dec 29, 2011 4:39 am

I like the trade^^ but only if there is extension in place.
OldNo7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,998
And1: 65
Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
       

Re: ESPN.com: Blue Jays should acquire Matt Garza from the C 

Post#20 » by OldNo7 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 4:38 pm

This is solely the point of view of an ESPN Chicago writer, not one of ESPN's well-connected scribes, so of course the writer is only looking out for the Cubs' best interest.
Twitter: @NickObergan

Return to Toronto Blue Jays