Should realGM be less strict about locking threads?

Want something added or changed? Let yourself be heard here!

Yes or No

Yes
6
50%
No
6
50%
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
Storm Surge
General Manager
Posts: 9,024
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#1 » by Storm Surge » Wed Dec 28, 2011 6:51 am

I mean I don't get who they are trying to impress by locking all those threads, most threads are funny and add to the enjoyment of the forum but get locked because it might be too much of a joke or whatnot but I mean who are they trying to impress?
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66,370
And1: 16,301
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#2 » by Howard Mass » Wed Dec 28, 2011 8:06 pm

Storm Surge,

Which threads in particular are you mentioning?

Sometimes threads are locked because there is already a topic for it and sometimes they are irrelevant to the forum.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)

:beer:
jax98
RealGM
Posts: 36,697
And1: 3,015
Joined: Aug 31, 2003

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#3 » by jax98 » Sat Dec 31, 2011 7:52 pm

It's not about impressing anyone. It's a question of maintaining a level of quality. In order to maximize the potential of this forum, it's necessary to have it organized in the best possible way. Troll threads, duplicate threads and threads that in general shouldn't exist, will be locked in order to help the overall quality of the board.
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66,370
And1: 16,301
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#4 » by Howard Mass » Sat Dec 31, 2011 8:40 pm

Well Said Mort!
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)

:beer:
User avatar
Yuri Vaultin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,168
And1: 14,506
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: In a tree by your window.
     

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#5 » by Yuri Vaultin » Tue Jan 3, 2012 7:57 am

Damn... It won't let me lock this thread in order to impress my girlfriend. Storm Surge, your voice has been heard.
Image
Props to Turbo_Zone for the sig.
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66,370
And1: 16,301
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#6 » by Howard Mass » Tue Jan 3, 2012 6:23 pm

LOL!
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)

:beer:
aurareturn1
Banned User
Posts: 887
And1: 4
Joined: Sep 19, 2011
Contact:

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#7 » by aurareturn1 » Wed Jan 4, 2012 10:24 am

Mods lock threads way too often usually without explanation. It gets very annoying and the locking is very inconsistent.

Also, just because trolls come in and say "ibtl" or "in before the lock" doesn't mean that the mods have to lock it.

Then there's the agenda locking. If a Rose had a bad shooting night thread is created, you'll most likely see a Bulls mod locking it.
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66,370
And1: 16,301
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#8 » by Howard Mass » Wed Jan 4, 2012 11:53 pm

A lot of times it's a duplicate thread or something that is already being discussed in a game thread.

I trust the judgement of The Moderators.

If you feel a thread should not have been locked, please let me know and I'll look at it.

Thanks!
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)

:beer:
aurareturn1
Banned User
Posts: 887
And1: 4
Joined: Sep 19, 2011
Contact:

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#9 » by aurareturn1 » Thu Jan 5, 2012 4:25 am

Howard Mass wrote:A lot of times it's a duplicate thread or something that is already being discussed in a game thread.

I trust the judgement of The Moderators.

If you feel a thread should not have been locked, please let me know and I'll look at it.

Thanks!

I sure will.

Also, instead of locking threads, I suggest mods move threads to the appropriate forum more often.
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66,370
And1: 16,301
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#10 » by Howard Mass » Thu Jan 5, 2012 8:04 am

Moderators sometimes do that when they feel it is appropriate and when that Forum's Moderators are ok with having the thread on their forum.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)

:beer:
aurareturn1
Banned User
Posts: 887
And1: 4
Joined: Sep 19, 2011
Contact:

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#11 » by aurareturn1 » Mon Jan 9, 2012 11:49 am

Here's one:
viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1145184&start=120

Doctor MJ decides to lock the thread out of no where. He then warns that there shouldn't be any more future of Marshon Brooks threads even though there weren't any active in the General Discussion forum.

That thread had a fun discussion going with people actually posting content and cool videos. Why lock it?

There is no way to defend Doctor MJ. It was a stupid lock. He did nothing by locking the thread but discourage posters.
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 10,304
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#12 » by HMFFL » Mon Jan 9, 2012 7:02 pm

aurareturn1 wrote:Here's one:
viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1145184&start=120

Doctor MJ decides to lock the thread out of no where. He then warns that there shouldn't be any more future of Marshon Brooks threads even though there weren't any active in the General Discussion forum.

That thread had a fun discussion going with people actually posting content and cool videos. Why lock it?

There is no way to defend Doctor MJ. It was a stupid lock. He did nothing by locking the thread but discourage posters.


Doctor MJ has no control of locking topics on the General Board, this topic was moved to his board from the General Board (99% positive), and ultimately he felt there was enough Brooks discussions currently on the player comparison board at the time. I personally have no problem with the thread, but I also have no idea if post had been reported from the thread, and if the discussion started to decline as the thread progressed.
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66,370
And1: 16,301
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#13 » by Howard Mass » Mon Jan 9, 2012 10:09 pm

I trust the judgement of the Moderators on these issues.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)

:beer:
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,809
And1: 37,037
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#14 » by RIPskaterdude » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:41 am

aurareturn1 wrote:Mods lock threads way too often usually without explanation. It gets very annoying and the locking is very inconsistent.

Also, just because trolls come in and say "ibtl" or "in before the lock" doesn't mean that the mods have to lock it.

Then there's the agenda locking. If a Rose had a bad shooting night thread is created, you'll most likely see a Bulls mod locking it.


Guy got waved, let that be a lesson to all of you who write angry things about mods! :angry:
Image
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66,370
And1: 16,301
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Should realGM be less strict about locking threads? 

Post#15 » by Howard Mass » Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:08 am

The user was waived for an unrelated offense.

We allow constructive criticism but there are users who already have a bunch of warnings stacked up and like to complain and blame everyone else for their conduct.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)

:beer:

Return to Feedback and Suggestions