Game #9 Magic at Kings ...

Nemesis21 · Post #1 » by **Nemesis21** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:00 am

5-3
@

3-5

Where:

When: Sunday 1/8

TV:

Starting lineups subject to change:

PG

SG

SF

PF

C

VS

PG

SG

SF

PF

C

Good Luck Hot Chick:

You've been warned, the Magic are legit !!!

magicman123 · Post #2 » by **magicman123** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:02 am

we could win this game

NickAnderson · Post #3 » by **NickAnderson** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:04 am

WE LOSE, BLOW THE TEAM UP!

Nolimit1211 · Post #4 » by **Nolimit1211** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:15 am

Evans is like 6'4? Oh dear god Jameer please don't let him have a career night...

Moshi · Post #5 » by **Moshi** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:17 am

What a great shot of Arco Arena. When is it from? I guess early 2000s, never saw it that filled afterwards.

CPBalla2003 n da 863 · Post #6 » by **CPBalla2003 n da 863** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:29 am

lets get back on the winning track. the Bulls ruin alot of moods around here.

Post #7 » by **eyriq** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:31 am

Lets keep winning the games we should. Magic by 5

ADRajX · Post #8 » by **ADRajX** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:31 am

Let's bounce back and get back on track

Moshi · Post #9 » by **Moshi** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:46 am

Yeah well I had Arco Arena in my head 10+ years so I guess it's gonna stay that way.

Mr13A · Post #10 » by **Mr13A** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:59 am

We don't seem to match up well with the kings for some reason.
We should definitelly still wins this

magicman123 · Post #11 » by **magicman123** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 2:42 am

here is a nice stat

meer: (7pts) richardson: (9.8pts) = 16.8pts, 58.9min, avg per 8.4
duhon: (3.9pts) redick: (12.3pts) = 16.2pts, 44.9min, avg per 15

ADRajX · Post #12 » by **ADRajX** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 2:47 am

magicman123 wrote:here is a nice stat

meer: (7pts) richardson: (9.8pts) = 16.8pts, 58.9min, avg per 8.4
duhon: (3.9pts) redick: (12.3pts) = 16.2pts, 44.9min, avg per 15

rcklsscognition · Post #13 » by **rcklsscognition** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 3:00 am

I really would not be surprised if Duhon got the starting nod if Jameer has a bad road trip.

magicman123 · Post #14 » by **magicman123** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 3:07 am

we have a big edge in the front court, they have the back court

hedo+ryan+dwight = 52.1pts
salmons+hickson+cousins = 29.3pts

jameer+jrich = 16.9pts
evans+thornton = 35.2pts

Post #15 » by **Def Swami** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 3:23 am

Tough stretch of games coming up.

Nemesis21 · Post #16 » by **Nemesis21** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 5:21 am

magicman123 wrote:we have a big edge in the front court, they have the back court

hedo+ryan+dwight = 52.1pts
salmons+hickson+cousins = 29.3pts

jameer+jrich = 16.9pts
evans+thornton = 35.2pts

Need Dwight to dominate Cousins and Hickson.

Post #17 » by **ChosenSavior** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 5:39 am

This road trip is going to be a very good test for us. It's going to be kinda hard to expect what Sacramento is going to do since they have a new head coach now, however this is certainly a game that we can take. The energy and effort has to be consistent though. All in all, LET'S GET IT!!! 8-)

On a separate note, what has me most intrigued is Stan's interview after the Bulls game. Him along with the coaching staff have been mulling over the starting lineup and they feel that they would have better continuity if they had a player starting that is a "glue" guy so to speak meaning that they do the little things to stabilize the offense. While having everyone who is capable of scoring is good for our spacing for Dwight, it also causes an issue as these guys need shot attempts to get going. For some reason, I expect a change to our starting lineup, I just can't really figure out what the change is going to be exactly.

asianguy · Post #18 » by **asianguy** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 7:36 am

I think the starting line up is fine, but Stan need to have better rotations, we need a wing defender in there sometime, Q or Liggins need to get some minutes

Reverse_Angle · Post #19 » by **Reverse_Angle** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 8:58 am

ChosenSavior wrote:This road trip is going to be a very good test for us. It's going to be kinda hard to expect what Sacramento is going to do since they have a new head coach now, however this is certainly a game that we can take. The energy and effort has to be consistent though. All in all, LET'S GET IT!!!

On a separate note, what has me most intrigued is Stan's interview after the Bulls game. Him along with the coaching staff have been mulling over the starting lineup and they feel that they would have better continuity if they had a player starting that is a "glue" guy so to speak meaning that they do the little things to stabilize the offense. While having everyone who is capable of scoring is good for our spacing for Dwight, it also causes an issue as these guys need shot attempts to get going. For some reason, I expect a change to our starting lineup, I just can't really figure out what the change is going to be exactly.

Interesting. BUT where is the good luck charm??? :lol:

drsd · Post #20 » by **drsd** » Sun Jan 8, 2012 9:03 am

ChosenSavior wrote:This road trip is going to be a very good test for us.

With Orlando losing its first home game, yes this is a good test. All road wins are good wins; and this is a winnable, albeit tough, game.