alucryts wrote:The only difference this makes is on the defensive end. This won't affect anything offensively.
1. How can anyone arguing with this?
2. How can anyone not realise this to begin with?
Do you plan on having Thibs call a timeout, approach opposing coach to inform them that they need to now have their C guard Boozer and not their PF because he's switched their positions? You can't control what the other team does defensively.
You can call Rose the PF and play Boozer at PG for all it matters they're still going to assign the same defense to guard the players on our end
As far as the offense goes, what difference does it make if you call him the C, PF, SF or whatever as long as Boozer and Noah are out there together, there's clearly a problem
Personally I'd start Asik/Boozer/Deng/Brewer/Rose and bring Noah/Gibson/Korver/Hamilton/Watson off the bench. Each unit has 2 defensive specialists, and no lack of offense when you go to the bench, with your backcourt and sf all capable of scoring.
In theory you bring Hamilton and Noah in early (around the midway point of the 1st qtr) to play alongside the starters, and end the qtr with the complete 2nd unit coming in around the 3 min remaining mark of the qtr.
This means Brewer/Asik are playing about 24 mins a game as are Noah/Hamilton
It's a little bit less than what Noah is averaging now, (26mins) an extra 7 more mins for Asik
Brewer gets 4 more mins than what he's getting now, and Hamilton about 5 mins less...again this is just in theory and obviously Thibs decisions are game to game
With Korver/Watson coming in the last 3 mins and starting the first 3 mins of the next qtr, in theory again they're all playing 3mins a qtr i.e 12 mins a game leaving Deng/Rose at 36 mins a game
Rose - same as he's playing now
Deng- a 2 min decrease in mins
Korver - a 7 min decrease
Watson - pretty much same mins
Boozer - continues to play 30 mins a game
Gibson - goes to 18 mins a game instead of 20