In the back of my head I thought people jinxed Horford with all the calling Bogut injury prone////
If I'm not wrong all Horford's injury's have come on offense...
Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
- Ruhiel
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,502
- And1: 45
- Joined: Dec 28, 2010
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 53,984
- And1: 10,355
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
Thanks for letting me know and for posting the video.
I hope it's not too serious.
I hope it's not too serious.
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 241
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
stating the obvious... Hawks had a horrible 3rd. I don't know if having Horford would have dramatically changed that but i'm still not going to put that much into the loss.
losing an all star center is significant, so i can hold onto that as an excuse. when ever Smoove, Horford, or Joe are hurt, i think it is a big deal, because the Hawks don't have a Dwight, Rose, or Lebron to carry the team.
if only Teague or Marvin were injured, then i would be more upset by the loss, but since our big three are just above average and not elite, losing one of the three is a big deal. and like i said before the Pacers are a good team with 5 strong starters.
losing an all star center is significant, so i can hold onto that as an excuse. when ever Smoove, Horford, or Joe are hurt, i think it is a big deal, because the Hawks don't have a Dwight, Rose, or Lebron to carry the team.
if only Teague or Marvin were injured, then i would be more upset by the loss, but since our big three are just above average and not elite, losing one of the three is a big deal. and like i said before the Pacers are a good team with 5 strong starters.
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,363
- And1: 2,483
- Joined: Apr 08, 2009
-
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
Ruhiel wrote:In the back of my head I thought people jinxed Horford with all the calling Bogut injury prone////
If I'm not wrong all Horford's injury's have come on offense...
Let us know when Al misses more than 10 games a season 4 times in a 7 year career.
Truly despicable that a Hawk player goes down and you're taking shots at them but oh, don't call you a hater though.
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
We Like Our New Core
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,173
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 21, 2011
- Location: The Transplant Capital
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
Ruhiel wrote:In the back of my head I thought people jinxed Horford with all the calling Bogut injury prone////
If I'm not wrong all Horford's injury's have come on offense...
Yes, your hate for Al and love for Bogut is just borderline silly. Bogut is not a winner, I think he has been to the playoffs once in like 7 or 8 years. Horford every year
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
-
- Senior
- Posts: 667
- And1: 2
- Joined: Aug 05, 2002
- Location: atlanta
-
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
- Ruhiel
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,502
- And1: 45
- Joined: Dec 28, 2010
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
MaceCase wrote:Ruhiel wrote:In the back of my head I thought people jinxed Horford with all the calling Bogut injury prone////
If I'm not wrong all Horford's injury's have come on offense...
Let us know when Al misses more than 10 games a season 4 times in a 7 year career.
Truly despicable that a Hawk player goes down and you're taking shots at them but oh, don't call you a hater though.
Peak.
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
- Ruhiel
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,502
- And1: 45
- Joined: Dec 28, 2010
Re: Atlanta Hawks (7-3) vs Indiana Pacers (6-3)
smittylo wrote:if we only had Jon Leuer.
A stretch forward who can now also play center? Value might require picks now. Too little too late.
