First of all, I'm not some "random rube". Random? I post here almost everyday. I usually don't start threads as mine usually don't get lots of activity. Looks like I've finally found a Hot Button to generate some discussion.
I don't see any problem with having a thread to gripe about what our coach is doing. As others have said, that has made up a good chunk of what we've done here in the past. Maybe I should've titled the thread "minor criticisms of the all-mighty and wise Rick Adelman." "Beefs" was too strong of a term I guess?
I could've given more reasons for my gripes, but when I make posts too long they tend to not get read/responded to.
- I'm aware we're injured. I even mentioned it in the OP. That doesn't mean Ridnour has to gobble up minutes at SG so Rubio has to play PG for less than ideal stretches. And yes, I wouldn't mind seeing Wes get more burn. He's not that bad. This same this happened with Corey Brewer. This team expects us to have an above and beyond 2guard for some reason. Looking around the league, I see lots of defensive specialists playings SG. I think Wes has more potential than many of them.
- I'm a bit taken aback by the knee-jerk reactions from so many. What is the reason for everyone to make mountains out of mole-hills?

I didn't mean to bash Adelman relentlessly, I just had some issues I was wondering if anyone else had.
- My bad on the Bargs quote. I forgot Toronto was getting blown out. We've been in so many close ones that it is difficult to bench your best players. Thanks to those for enlightening me.
Adelman said he liked the physical presence Nikola Pekovic has brought to the Wolves in the last two games. He will continue to get time when the Wolves are dealing with a strong, physical post presence. "He is going to be around the basket," Adelman said. "He sets good, hard picks and he's going to be a physical presence. I thought he made a difference against (Sacramento's DeMarcus) Cousins last night."
Now I have another thing to call him out on.

I'm not going to pretend like we knew how healthy/ready Pek was, but many of us were calling for this awhile ago. Low and behold, Pek- albeit foul prone- is a force against bigger lineups!
I've seen lots of other coaches tinker with rotations and lineups more than us, when I feel like we could really use it. I'm not seeing it as much as I'd like.
--Adelman said he is concerned with the minutes Love is playing. Love ranks first in the league in minutes played per game (39.6 minutes) and has played more than 40 minutes in each of the Wolves' last three games. Problem is, when he takes Love out, the Wolves usually struggle. "I've probably played him more than I'd like," Adelman said. "But ... last night, I took him out for a pretty good stretch, and we lost eight, 10 points really quick. So it's hard."
I'm glad to hear this. Calling back to the ATL game, I think anyone with fresher legs for 5 minutes could've produced more during the 4th than Love did.
If I remember correctly, we made our huge run to get back into the game vs. the Bulls with Love on the bench and a completely fresh Rubio/Williams. I guess what I'm saying is I'm not opposed to giving Love some rest (especially during back2backs) in favor of some more Williams.
I'm confident that once Beasley and JJ come back Rubio won't get as winded, but we have a decently healthy PF/C rotation, and Love still sees too many minutes for my liking. Maybe Adelman is more comfortable having Love off the floor with Beasley on it?
I'm not just going to take Adelmans decisions as gospel. You want to disagree? Fine. But please don't act like I'm some troll.
"Llevaré mi talento a Minnesota".