ImageImageImage

MN - POR

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

MN - POR 

Post#1 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:43 pm

MN OUT: Anthony Tolliver, Utah 2012 first (lotto prot.), Memphis 2013 first (lotto prot).
MN IN: Nicola Batum

Minnesota trades an expiring role player and two first to get the rights to Batum, a player they can plug in at SF long term and add to the core of Love + Rubio. Minnesota would also be willing to swap Tolliver for Randolph.

POR OUT: Nicolas Batum
POR IN: Anthony Tolliver, Utah 2012 first (lotto prot.), Memphis 2013 first (lotto prot.)

Portland decides to part ways with Batum rather than pay him big $ to be a back up. They get Tolliver, a player that can play a role off the bench for them the rest of the year, and two first round picks for the loss of the promising Batum. Portland could also have Randolph instead of Tolliver.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: MN - POR 

Post#2 » by Esohny » Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:49 pm

I'd do it. Don't know about Portland.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: MN - POR 

Post#3 » by Narf » Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:50 pm

I like Tolliver a lot (not sure why so many don't) as a cheap bench player. But I'd do that. Batum is a pretty solid fit.

We would, of course, have to trade Beasley no matter what then.
User avatar
kmgarnett21
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,868
And1: 398
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
       

Re: MN - POR 

Post#4 » by kmgarnett21 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:13 pm

Narf wrote:I like Tolliver a lot (not sure why so many don't) as a cheap bench player. But I'd do that. Batum is a pretty solid fit.

We would, of course, have to trade Beasley no matter what then.


I'd do it depending on what we got back from a Beasley trade.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,295
And1: 19,306
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MN - POR 

Post#5 » by shrink » Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:16 pm

Do you think Batum could play SG on this team?
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: MN - POR 

Post#6 » by jpatrick » Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:22 pm

Batum is basically what we all hoped Johnson would turn out to be. A very good defensive SF, who can run the floor, finish with hops (and a huge wingspan), and shot the three. He also appears to be a team kind of guy. My problem with him is that he doesn't give us what we "really" need which is a wing that can handle the ball and create for himself and others. Batum might have a slightly better handle than Johnson but not by much so I'd go no on SG being his full-time position.

That said, Portland is not going to let him go that cheaply. They'll let this play out and match offers this summer unless they get something of real value.
ifrclone
Freshman
Posts: 90
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2009

Re: MN - POR 

Post#7 » by ifrclone » Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:24 pm

As a Portland Fan(with Wolves being my dark horse since last season), I would rather do Darko for Batum.
Or Pek, but I have a feeling he is going to pickup his game.
User avatar
mark blunt
Sophomore
Posts: 174
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 14, 2009

Re: MN - POR 

Post#8 » by mark blunt » Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:27 pm

ifrclone wrote:As a Portland Fan(with Wolves being my dark horse since last season), I would rather do Darko for Batum.
Or Pek, but I have a feeling he is going to pickup his game.


If you insist :D
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:I am envious of your team. Apologize to GM Kahn for me. Just an excellent securing of assets albeit in a round about way.
His method was goofy and quirky at first, wasting picks on all those PG's but in the end he seems to have gotten it done.
ifrclone
Freshman
Posts: 90
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2009

Re: MN - POR 

Post#9 » by ifrclone » Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:33 pm

I know, I know...it seems lopsided...
But, we could really use Darko in Joel type of a role. Block some shots, drop a couple of fools on the floor.
I like what I am seeing from E-Will in (very)limited minutes. He could be a good bench player and fill that spot, and if Batum is just going to walk..well, we should really make a run for another big body...
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,960
And1: 1,217
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: MN - POR 

Post#10 » by jscott » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:06 pm

shrink wrote:Do you think Batum could play SG on this team?

Unless we think either Beasley is the guy at SF or that Williams will be a 3 then we shouldn't care. We still need + production out of our SF.

This trade would almost be too good to be true so I wouldn't think Portland would do it. But this would allow us to still move Williams to fill another hole.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MN - POR 

Post#11 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:10 pm

jscott wrote:
shrink wrote:Do you think Batum could play SG on this team?

Unless we think either Beasley is the guy at SF or that Williams will be a 3 then we shouldn't care. We still need + production out of our SF.

This trade would almost be too good to be true so I wouldn't think Portland would do it. But this would allow us to still move Williams to fill another hole.


That's my thinking. It would still allow us to trade Williams for Gordon.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: MN - POR 

Post#12 » by Narf » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:11 pm

I think Darko would be a solid addition to Portland. Aldridge makes up for his weakness (post scoring) and his strength is what Portland needs (help defender).
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,960
And1: 1,217
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: MN - POR 

Post#13 » by jscott » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:13 pm

Krapinsky wrote:
jscott wrote:
shrink wrote:Do you think Batum could play SG on this team?

Unless we think either Beasley is the guy at SF or that Williams will be a 3 then we shouldn't care. We still need + production out of our SF.

This trade would almost be too good to be true so I wouldn't think Portland would do it. But this would allow us to still move Williams to fill another hole.


That's my thinking. It would still allow us to trade Williams for Gordon.

Right.

Which I think we all can agree that it makes a lot of sense for both sides.

My concern is that we may need one or both of those picks to send to NOLA in a Gordon trade (to make up for the drop the MIN pick will take). Perhaps NOLA would rather shed Okafor than take back a couple of mid-round 1sts. You could sign me up for that all day long.

Rubio/Gordon/Batum/Love/Okafor - still have an okay bench if you have to move Beasley and/or Wes to NOLA to make contracts work.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MN - POR 

Post#14 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:17 pm

jscott wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:
jscott wrote:Unless we think either Beasley is the guy at SF or that Williams will be a 3 then we shouldn't care. We still need + production out of our SF.

This trade would almost be too good to be true so I wouldn't think Portland would do it. But this would allow us to still move Williams to fill another hole.


That's my thinking. It would still allow us to trade Williams for Gordon.

Right.

Which I think we all can agree that it makes a lot of sense for both sides.

My concern is that we may need one or both of those picks to send to NOLA in a Gordon trade (to make up for the drop the MIN pick will take). Perhaps NOLA would rather shed Okafor than take back a couple of mid-round 1sts. You could sign me up for that all day long.

Rubio/Gordon/Batum/Love/Okafor - still have an okay bench if you have to move Beasley and/or Wes to NOLA to make contracts work.


Such a deal could wait until after the season. Then we could do a S&T for Gordon with Williams + Miller + Ellington.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MN - POR 

Post#15 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:19 pm

Hmmm.....

Marc Stein @ESPNSteinLine Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
RT @johnschuhmann: Hornets announce that Eric Gordon (right knee contusion) will be out another 3-6 weeks
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,960
And1: 1,217
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: MN - POR 

Post#16 » by jscott » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:20 pm

Krapinsky wrote:
jscott wrote:Right.

Which I think we all can agree that it makes a lot of sense for both sides.

My concern is that we may need one or both of those picks to send to NOLA in a Gordon trade (to make up for the drop the MIN pick will take). Perhaps NOLA would rather shed Okafor than take back a couple of mid-round 1sts. You could sign me up for that all day long.

Rubio/Gordon/Batum/Love/Okafor - still have an okay bench if you have to move Beasley and/or Wes to NOLA to make contracts work.


Such a deal could wait until after the season. Then we could do a S&T for Gordon with Williams + Miller + Ellington.

Image
But I want him NOW!
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,960
And1: 1,217
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: MN - POR 

Post#17 » by jscott » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:21 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Hmmm.....

Marc Stein @ESPNSteinLine Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
RT @johnschuhmann: Hornets announce that Eric Gordon (right knee contusion) will be out another 3-6 weeks

Okay.. maybe not NOW as much as 3-6 weeks from NOW
yowyOw
Banned User
Posts: 1,544
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 09, 2012

Re: MN - POR 

Post#18 » by yowyOw » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:21 pm

I'd say to stick to either Beas or DWill and go for a SG like Harden (dream) or Mayo (reality).

Personally, I'd risk it going for Mo Williams, who has a player option this off-season. He's a PG, but could be a heck of SG.

Our biggest issue is the lack of a scoring SG and a dominant C on the defensive end since Love has little to no defensive anchor.

.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: MN - POR 

Post#19 » by Esohny » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:23 pm

jscott wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Hmmm.....

Marc Stein @ESPNSteinLine Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
RT @johnschuhmann: Hornets announce that Eric Gordon (right knee contusion) will be out another 3-6 weeks

Okay.. maybe not NOW as much as 3-6 weeks from NOW


He didn't want to sign their 4-year extension offer. Maybe if he were traded, his knee might just get better faster.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
Saltine
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,396
And1: 1,002
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: MN - POR 

Post#20 » by Saltine » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:48 pm

Everyone knows it takes many, many, weeks to heal a bruised knee.

;)

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves