NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco

Moderator: bwgood77

User avatar
Da Schwab
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,823
And1: 3,619
Joined: Apr 19, 2005
Location: Somewhere in the between.
Contact:
       

NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#941 » by Da Schwab » Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:03 am

Stunnaboy2K11 wrote:
Da Schwab wrote:YYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEESSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!


Rematch man, you ready?


So ready.
LoneyROY7
Banned User
Posts: 1,918
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 08, 2011

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#942 » by LoneyROY7 » Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:03 am

Tom Coughlin is beaming.
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#943 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:06 am

I'm going through the 7 stages of grief:

1. Denial--maybe they'll block the FG?
2. Pain--we were one Kyle Williams away from the Superbowl!
3. Anger--CUT KYLE WILLIAMS, HE SINGLE-HANDEDLY LOST US THE GAME!
4. Depression--sat silently in a room full of other depressed Niner fans. Dreamt of what could have been.
5. Upward Turn--Now I just feel really, really bad for Kyle Williams. Sincerely, I just want to give him a hug. No one feels worse about it than him. We had a great season and surpassed everyone's expectations. We're building a winning culture and Harbaugh is the man.

And that's where I'm at, only two stages to go.

Congrats Schwab. Just please don't change your avy to a gif of that game, PLEASE! :cry:
rpa
RealGM
Posts: 15,052
And1: 7,862
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#944 » by rpa » Mon Jan 23, 2012 7:05 am

ninjabelly wrote:SERIOUSLY? even if we had lost the turnover battle 1-0 we'd have won, and yes the niners need a WR


Even if Williams hadn't screwed up a 2nd time they were still going to lose. Our offense couldn't move the ball against the Giants defense (mostly thanks to our horrible receiving core), the Giants were picking up a good 10-20 yards each possession which would eventually swing the field position heavily in their favor, and Andy Lee wasn't punting it as well as usual. Put those 3 things together and overtime was just going to be a slow death for the 49ers.

However, had Williams not screwed up the first time the 49ers win this game. The Giants had trouble putting together anything longer than the 10-20 yards I previously mentioned in the second half. Giving them that field position was a killer.
dreamintoaction
Ballboy
Posts: 1
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#945 » by dreamintoaction » Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:33 pm

This was heartbreaking. Such a disappointment. Well if youre a Giants or Pats fan - this is rather sweet. win tix to the superbowl lastclck.com
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#946 » by aggo » Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:38 pm

rpa wrote:
ninjabelly wrote:SERIOUSLY? even if we had lost the turnover battle 1-0 we'd have won, and yes the niners need a WR


Even if Williams hadn't screwed up a 2nd time they were still going to lose. Our offense couldn't move the ball against the Giants defense (mostly thanks to our horrible receiving core), the Giants were picking up a good 10-20 yards each possession which would eventually swing the field position heavily in their favor, and Andy Lee wasn't punting it as well as usual. Put those 3 things together and overtime was just going to be a slow death for the 49ers.

However, had Williams not screwed up the first time the 49ers win this game. The Giants had trouble putting together anything longer than the 10-20 yards I previously mentioned in the second half. Giving them that field position was a killer.

100% agreed with this analysis


Crabtree was completely invisible this game.
desertlakerfan
Analyst
Posts: 3,066
And1: 32
Joined: May 20, 2009
Location: Where none like it hot
   

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#947 » by desertlakerfan » Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:38 pm

That Bradshaw fumble no call screwed SF just as much as Kyle Williams fumbles. The side judge first blew the whistle about a half a second AFTER the ball had already come out, he even went as far as to gesture possession for NY while repeatedly blowing the whistle to avoid anyone trying to overrule him and more importantly, keep SF from challenging the play which was a obvious fumble.

It's sad such a great game had to be mired by such a horribly biased call by the side judge with 2 minutes left and the ball in chip shot FG range for Akers, but it's something hopefully the rules committee will look at when it comes to officials blowing plays dead early keeping a team from challenging a turn over. It happened quite a few times throughout the season, and hopefully won't also negatively impact the super bowl.

Plenty of reasons why SF lost, starting with NY being a great team, it's just a shame that one side judge taking the game into his own hands(keeping SF from the opportunity to challenge) had such a huge impact on the outcome.
Celtsfan1980
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,853
And1: 192
Joined: Mar 25, 2008

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#948 » by Celtsfan1980 » Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:49 pm

The analyst for Fox seemed to think the "fumble" was a good call.
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#949 » by aggo » Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:52 pm

desertlakerfan wrote:That Bradshaw fumble no call screwed SF just as much as Kyle Williams fumbles. The side judge first blew the whistle about a half a second AFTER the ball had already come out, he even went as far as to gesture possession for NY while repeatedly blowing the whistle to avoid anyone trying to overrule him and more importantly, keep SF from challenging the play which was a obvious fumble.

It's sad such a great game had to be mired by such a horribly biased call by the side judge with 2 minutes left and the ball in chip shot FG range for Akers, but it's something hopefully the rules committee will look at when it comes to officials blowing plays dead early keeping a team from challenging a turn over. It happened quite a few times throughout the season, and hopefully won't also negatively impact the super bowl.

Plenty of reasons why SF lost, starting with NY being a great team, it's just a shame that one side judge taking the game into his own hands(keeping SF from the opportunity to challenge) had such a huge impact on the outcome.


that call is made regularly, RB hits a pile of defenders, is stood up and the play is blown over while the RB is driven back and/or loses the football because he's in a pile of guys ripping it out of his hands.

I recall either the ref waving his hands or blowing the whistle at the top of the RB's progression. The fact that both refs came in and emphatically declared forward progress immediately makes me think that it was a routine call with little doubt.

I dont see any way that the rules committee changes this imo. It can only get worse. How/when do you define forward progress by the ball carrier under the hood? How do you determine when the play is over? When do you determine that the play is over?

They wont take away forward progress because of QBs getting stood up in the pocket. Every year there are a few times where there's pressure in the pocket, the QB gets stood up in a pile and the play is immediately blown dead before he's driven to the ground. it's the same rule used to protect the carrier against unnecessary and meaningless hits.
desertlakerfan
Analyst
Posts: 3,066
And1: 32
Joined: May 20, 2009
Location: Where none like it hot
   

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#950 » by desertlakerfan » Mon Jan 23, 2012 7:03 pm

AggO wrote:
desertlakerfan wrote:That Bradshaw fumble no call screwed SF just as much as Kyle Williams fumbles. The side judge first blew the whistle about a half a second AFTER the ball had already come out, he even went as far as to gesture possession for NY while repeatedly blowing the whistle to avoid anyone trying to overrule him and more importantly, keep SF from challenging the play which was a obvious fumble.

It's sad such a great game had to be mired by such a horribly biased call by the side judge with 2 minutes left and the ball in chip shot FG range for Akers, but it's something hopefully the rules committee will look at when it comes to officials blowing plays dead early keeping a team from challenging a turn over. It happened quite a few times throughout the season, and hopefully won't also negatively impact the super bowl.

Plenty of reasons why SF lost, starting with NY being a great team, it's just a shame that one side judge taking the game into his own hands(keeping SF from the opportunity to challenge) had such a huge impact on the outcome.


that call is made regularly, RB hits a pile of defenders, is stood up and the play is blown over while the RB is driven back and/or loses the football because he's in a pile of guys ripping it out of his hands.

I recall either the ref waving his hands or blowing the whistle at the top of the RB's progression. The fact that both refs came in and emphatically declared forward progress immediately makes me think that it was a routine call with little doubt.

I dont see any way that the rules committee changes this imo. It can only get worse. How/when do you define forward progress by the ball carrier under the hood? How do you determine when the play is over? When do you determine that the play is over?

They wont take away forward progress because of QBs getting stood up in the pocket. Every year there are a few times where there's pressure in the pocket, the QB gets stood up in a pile and the play is immediately blown dead before he's driven to the ground. it's the same rule used to protect the carrier against unnecessary and meaningless hits.


It's simple, keep the field mic'd(which they already do), include sound into replays and determine when the whistle is blown and if the runner still had possession of the ball or not.

Right now the rules are set to where officials can still let their bias impact a game through blowing the whistle "early". The play in question had the whistle blowing as the ball was coming out, which should be easy to challenge and overturn had SF been given the opportunity to challenge.

A side judge tried the same call last week against NO, however the head official was close enough to the play to overrule him blowing the play dead and it was correctly ruled a fumble on the field. This time Ed Hocules was too far from the play, and by the time he arrived the side judge had already blown the whistle about 5x and signaled NY ball repeatedly.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,332
And1: 12,189
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#951 » by Worm Guts » Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:52 pm

It was the right call, whether or not the whistle was blown before the fumble. Bradshaw's forward progress had been stopped and he was being pushed back at the time of the fumble.
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,660
And1: 2,190
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#952 » by High 5 » Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:10 pm

Giants Targeted Kyle Williams' Concussion History

I know players are always going after the other guy's weaknesses, but something about telling the world you were targeting someone because of prior concussions doesn't sit well. Maybe it's just me.
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#953 » by aggo » Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:45 pm

High 5 wrote:Giants Targeted Kyle Williams' Concussion History

I know players are always going after the other guy's weaknesses, but something about telling the world you were targeting someone because of prior concussions doesn't sit well. Maybe it's just me.



ehh fair game in the NFL circles. iirc, Williams was the one himself who said he had all those concussions.
User avatar
Sandlot
Junior
Posts: 326
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 07, 2010

Re: NFC Championship: NY Giants @ San Francisco 

Post#954 » by Sandlot » Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:47 am

Not sure I'd call it fair game. Wasn't one of the big hold ups in the offseason bargaining giving players better medical protection once they had retired because of problems with concussions? If you want to target a hurt shoulder or leg thats one thing but a concussion could end their form of normal life. It has serious medical repercussions going way beyond one game.
To be fair I think they were saying they were just trying to scare him but if you are trying to give another person a concussion . . . well then there is something seriously wrong with that.
Image

Return to The General NFL Board