ImageImageImageImageImage

WT: Kings not moving Evans to SF

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 3,306
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: WT: Kings not moving Evans to SF 

Post#21 » by blind prophet » Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:34 pm

ICMTM wrote:The Kings just don't have the talent across the board. You have Reke, Cousins, Thornton, and then everyone else is at best serviceable. In different situations our role players probably could do more in the league but they wouldn't get significant run on quality teams.

I don't think asking players to do things they aren't particularly great at will make this team better.


We have 3 solid defenders who can defend multiple postions in Tyreke, Donte, John. Now as long as you can get the "right" setups on offense who cares what position they are called.
MagnusPinus
Analyst
Posts: 3,108
And1: 148
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: Torino - Italia

Re: WT: Kings not moving Evans to SF 

Post#22 » by MagnusPinus » Sun Feb 5, 2012 12:28 am

Would u trade him for Derrick Williams plus pick/other players not named Rubio/Love?
GuyverADL wrote:
The only thing Curry will raise from the start of the season is his cholesterol.
People do not understand Curry's reason for wanting to be a ballerina. He wanted to be able to contort his body to be able to fit in the fridge.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: WT: Kings not moving Evans to SF 

Post#23 » by SacKingZZZ » Sun Feb 5, 2012 2:51 am

ICMTM wrote:The Kings just don't have the talent across the board. You have Reke, Cousins, Thornton, and then everyone else is at best serviceable. In different situations our role players probably could do more in the league but they wouldn't get significant run on quality teams.

I don't think asking players to do things they aren't particularly great at will make this team better.



You have 3 guys that are legit and the rest are role players? Hmmm...sounds like the balance for any good team to me! Role players get time depending on how much they help your best guys and vice versa.

I agree with the last statement, that's why it's crucial to have the right system and enough shooting and defense from the other positions to help your team be more dangerous as built around your offensive studs.
VeeJay24
Starter
Posts: 2,081
And1: 11
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Washington DC
       

Re: WT: Kings not moving Evans to SF 

Post#24 » by VeeJay24 » Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:22 am

ICMTM wrote:The Kings just don't have the talent across the board. You have Reke, Cousins, Thornton, and then everyone else is at best serviceable. In different situations our role players probably could do more in the league but they wouldn't get significant run on quality teams.

I don't think asking players to do things they aren't particularly great at will make this team better.


I disagree with this. I think the Kings role players can be better than those on the Bulls, Thunder & Heat. It is just about the coach getting the guys to know their roles and not stepping out of those roles; getting them to buy in. It is as simple as that.
Sportz Gza

Return to Sacramento Kings