ImageImage

Suns at Hawks: Game Thread

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

Superiorblogman
Banned User
Posts: 2,173
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 21, 2011
Location: The Transplant Capital

Re: Suns at Hawks: Game Thread 

Post#21 » by Superiorblogman » Tue Feb 7, 2012 3:27 am

MaceCase wrote:
Ruhiel wrote:missed the entire game. Looks like same old same old. Smith probably scored on Markeieff Morris and his lack of wingspan? Or was it short skinny Hakim?
It was a lot of one on one play? Or was Drews dumb backdoor lobs? Or was it PnR. I know Nash did some PnR :roll:

Was Marvin matched up vs Hakim Warrick? Whatd Marvin do?

If you didn't watch the game, don't assume. Josh scored primarily on post ups on Frye, geez you didn't even look at a boxscore assuming that Hak played just going by the same ole contrived opinion rather than facts.


That's why he sounds so troll-like. He doesn't even watch games just runs around saying the same stuff over and over again. I doubt if he is even a Hawks fan just found the perfect team to troll since he knows nothing really ever changes around here
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Suns at Hawks: Game Thread 

Post#22 » by Ruhiel » Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:02 am

MaceCase wrote:
Ruhiel wrote:missed the entire game. Looks like same old same old. Smith probably scored on Markeieff Morris and his lack of wingspan? Or was it short skinny Hakim?
It was a lot of one on one play? Or was Drews dumb backdoor lobs? Or was it PnR. I know Nash did some PnR :roll:

Was Marvin matched up vs Hakim Warrick? Whatd Marvin do?

If you didn't watch the game, don't assume. Josh scored primarily on post ups on Frye, geez you didn't even look at a boxscore assuming that Hak played just going by the same ole contrived opinion rather than facts.

I assumed that Hak played because of the "same ole contrived opinion" rather than facts?

Gentry on swingman Josh Childress falling out of the rotation with Hakim Warrick now playing backup small forward: "It's just hard because our leading scorer is a backup at his position. I wish there was a way. It's not an easy thing. He's got every right to be upset. I just don't know how I can get him into games. He comes to practice real professional and works his butt off but there are two guys in front of him right now."
Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... z1lfJ6tr1S


There's my facts. What "same ole contrived opinion" are you talking about, that would lead me to suggest who Smith scored against?
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Suns at Hawks: Game Thread 

Post#23 » by MaceCase » Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:32 am

That's your comeback? It was easier for you to read an article from a month ago than glance at a freaking boxscore from tonight??????????????? But alas you were spouting off as if you knew every single outcome of the game.........even though you watched neither a single second, highlight or boxscore. Troll.
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Suns at Hawks: Game Thread 

Post#24 » by Ruhiel » Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:37 am

MaceCase wrote:That's your comeback? It was easier for you to read an article from a month ago than glance at a freaking boxscore from tonight??????????????? But alas you were spouting off as if you knew every single outcome of the game.........even though you watched neither a single second, highlight or boxscore. Troll.


I asked you a simple question. I dont follow the Suns and thats the last time I heard Warrick was there leading scorer.

Whats the same ole opinion that you said led me too that conclusion. Unless you can answer your the just trolling me to get into a stupid page long argument. Again.
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Suns at Hawks: Game Thread 

Post#25 » by MaceCase » Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:59 am

Simple question? Look at your replies in nearly every **** thread. It's the same copy and paste bull **** yet by your own admission you don't even bother to watch the games, at most you download 1 or 2 and scrub it for plays that only feed into your confirmation bias and then put em up as a youtube as if that proves everything.

Simple question? What a **** joke, I point out that you damn near claimed how and who Josh got points against and what Marvin did without even seeing the frickin boxscore to the game yet you think you're slick trying to clean the egg off your face by "confronting" me with such an asinine question..... Wow!

Maybe you should have SIMPLY looked at a boxscore before you decided to pen your postgame "analysis".
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Suns at Hawks: Game Thread 

Post#26 » by Ruhiel » Tue Feb 7, 2012 2:41 pm

MaceCase wrote:It's the same copy and paste bull **** yet by your own admission you don't even bother to watch the games, at most you download 1 or 2 and scrub it for plays that only feed into your confirmation bias and then put em up as a youtube as if that proves everything.

Simple question? What a **** joke, I point out that you damn near claimed how and who Josh got points against and what Marvin did without even seeing the frickin boxscore to the game yet you think you're slick trying to clean the egg off your face by "confronting" me with such an asinine question..... Wow!

Maybe you should have SIMPLY looked at a boxscore before you decided to pen your postgame "analysis".


I'm sorry, you say I don't watch entire games yet I scrub plays for "confirmatian bias"? Confirmation bias is in your own head. If I post every single touch or every single possession, without omitting any plays, the Hawks have thats being confirmation bias. Because I have that right now. Thats scrubbing over plays. You're so blind.

Where in THIS thread did I say what Marvin did? It should be VERY easy to point out and quote me on this.
I specifically asked what did Marvin do and his matchup, but in your own mind that adds up to me actually telling you what Marvin did using "confirmation bias"/
What a **** joke, indeed.

You see what I point out in videos and then say he's biased. I ask a question. And suddenly its a biased statement. Suddenly Al Horford can shoot 3s.
Fine, If its ME trolling and not YOU trolling me to be a pain in the ass then you should be able to DIRECTLY quote me where I said, without looking for a box score, what Marvin did against the Suns.

Otherwise, you're a hypocrite who jumps to conclusions based on your own biases, not me.

Return to Atlanta Hawks