OKC @ POR

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

OzThunder
Rookie
Posts: 1,064
And1: 393
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#21 » by OzThunder » Tue Feb 7, 2012 6:56 am

Another point no one has spoken about is the fact that LA's arm is in Durant's back the whole way.

Edit: on the goal tending play that is
Phailadelphia
Junior
Posts: 260
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 12, 2011

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#22 » by Phailadelphia » Tue Feb 7, 2012 7:09 am

seattlefan35 wrote:Another point no one has spoken about is the fact that LA's arm is in Durant's back the whole way.

Edit: on the goal tending play that is


Yep, could have very easily been called a foul and in all likelihood an And1 if LA doesnt go for the block/goaltend.
MASH Transit
Banned User
Posts: 1,006
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 31, 2011

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#23 » by MASH Transit » Tue Feb 7, 2012 8:44 am

Phailadelphia wrote:
seattlefan35 wrote:Another point no one has spoken about is the fact that LA's arm is in Durant's back the whole way.

Edit: on the goal tending play that is


Yep, could have very easily been called a foul and in all likelihood an And1 if LA doesnt go for the block/goaltend.


Durant was being hacked all night. On and off the ball. He just wasn't getting calls.
IanChang
Freshman
Posts: 96
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 29, 2008

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#24 » by IanChang » Tue Feb 7, 2012 2:36 pm

MASH Transit wrote:
Phailadelphia wrote:
seattlefan35 wrote:Another point no one has spoken about is the fact that LA's arm is in Durant's back the whole way.

Edit: on the goal tending play that is


Yep, could have very easily been called a foul and in all likelihood an And1 if LA doesnt go for the block/goaltend.


Durant was being hacked all night. On and off the ball. He just wasn't getting calls.



They simply played physical and I liked it a lot. The thunder must learn to adjust in rough plays and don't expect refs calls will help them out which often bring much controversy.
Phailadelphia
Junior
Posts: 260
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 12, 2011

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#25 » by Phailadelphia » Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:14 pm

IanChang wrote:
MASH Transit wrote:
seattlefan35 wrote:Another point no one has spoken about is the fact that LA's arm is in Durant's back the whole way.

Edit: on the goal tending play that is



Durant was being hacked all night. On and off the ball. He just wasn't getting calls.



They simply played physical and I liked it a lot. The thunder must learn to adjust in rough plays and don't expect refs calls will help them out which often bring much controversy.


Normally I would agree with you but any time KD tried to retaliate the PDX players would flop resulting in an offensive foul. It was like KD was not allowed to play physically to get open.
MASH Transit
Banned User
Posts: 1,006
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 31, 2011

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#26 » by MASH Transit » Tue Feb 7, 2012 5:42 pm

IanChang wrote:They simply played physical and I liked it a lot. The thunder must learn to adjust in rough plays and don't expect refs calls will help them out which often bring much controversy.


Except the "physical play" wasn't allowed both ways. Which is way Aldridge went to the line 13 times, and Durant went once. It's why Durant himself piled up multiple offense fouls as the result of flops, yet didn't get calls when contacted going to the rim.

And it wasn't just Durant. I remember James Harden was on a break, hit the last man with a euro step, the man slid into him late, he missed the layup, and there was no call. Portland rebounds and heads the other way.

There was another instance where Ibaka grabbed an offensive board, and went back up strong for a dunk. The contact was so blatant I thought Portland was intentionally fouling him to put him on the line instead of giving him an easy two. No call of course. Missed dunk.
User avatar
theokie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,032
And1: 617
Joined: Dec 22, 2008

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#27 » by theokie » Tue Feb 7, 2012 9:59 pm

JustBlaze52 wrote:
seattlefan35 wrote:Portland shot 26 foul shots to OKC's 22.

OKC 27 fouls- Portland 17 fouls.

And i'd suggest our team drives a lot more than yours. Though you go through the post more....

One bad call...


Hmmm... one bad ball that decides a game, made from beyond the 3-point line on the opposite side of the court... one bad call... :roll:

Oh it's okay it's okay, I won't troll. Enjoy the "win".


I guess we will enjoy the win. Its unfortunate that the refs made the call, would have been interesting to see how it would have played out.

I can understand Portland fans being so pissed though. Having a mediocre team in the west who's on the outside looking in to the playoffs right now, would be a huge boost to that team to steal a win over a much better opponent.
spearsy23 wrote: Kevin Durant could save a dozen orphans from a fire and realgm would point out that Lebron would have just put the fire out.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,293
And1: 8,034
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#28 » by Wizenheimer » Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:27 pm

the NBA has admitted it was a bad call:

http://www.nba.com/official/
Clangus
Banned User
Posts: 4,335
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 13, 2008
Location: On board Air Congo.

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#29 » by Clangus » Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:53 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:the NBA has admitted it was a bad call:

http://www.nba.com/official/

it was a bad call. No doubt about it.
neplife
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 14
Joined: Jun 09, 2004
Location: Oregon
   

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#30 » by neplife » Wed Feb 8, 2012 4:58 am

I've got a fun one, which call was worse:

1. Aldridge goal tending
2. UO v. OU onside kick

I guess Oklahoma got even last night. :D
RipCityUnited
Ballboy
Posts: 6
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2012

Re: OKC @ POR 

Post#31 » by RipCityUnited » Thu Feb 9, 2012 2:53 am

Yall gotta write Scott Fisher thank you cards.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder