ImageImageImageImageImage

Kings @ Wolves

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
ADoaN17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,044
And1: 312
Joined: Feb 11, 2010
   

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#81 » by ADoaN17 » Wed Feb 8, 2012 5:44 am

Wolfay wrote:We lost :( I kept checking the score in orchestra whenever my section wasn't playing and I eventually got caught, so I didn't know the final score until now :(

At least we were close in a road game against a not-so-bad team. It looks like Pekovic had his way though.

Yeah Pek dominated on offense and defense.
Image
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#82 » by KF10 » Wed Feb 8, 2012 6:34 am

More than anything, the SF position is still a glaring hole. Salmons didn't produce and mismatched against Beasley. That elected to have Greene come off the bench and defend him.

I want a SF who is tall, strong, can shoot 3s and defend. Is that hard to understand!!??
User avatar
bibby1023
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,320
And1: 215
Joined: Jan 17, 2008
Contact:
     

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#83 » by bibby1023 » Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:10 am

Our offense looked like **** tonight. We would have gotten blown out by 20 if Love was playing, luckily no one could score besides the big man for the wolves. Really wanted this win, and should have had it, just didn't deserve to win. I don't know if it was the back to back or what but the starting 5 looked real sluggish.
User avatar
ADoaN17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,044
And1: 312
Joined: Feb 11, 2010
   

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#84 » by ADoaN17 » Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:12 am

KF10 wrote:More than anything, the SF position is still a glaring hole. Salmons didn't produce and mismatched against Beasley. That elected to have Greene come off the bench and defend him.

I want a SF who is tall, strong, can shoot 3s and defend. Is that hard to understand!!??

Paul George?
Image
User avatar
bibby1023
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,320
And1: 215
Joined: Jan 17, 2008
Contact:
     

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#85 » by bibby1023 » Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:14 am

ADoaN17 wrote:
KF10 wrote:More than anything, the SF position is still a glaring hole. Salmons didn't produce and mismatched against Beasley. That elected to have Greene come off the bench and defend him.

I want a SF who is tall, strong, can shoot 3s and defend. Is that hard to understand!!??

Paul George?

Dorell Wright?
User avatar
andyhop
Analyst
Posts: 3,628
And1: 1,320
Joined: May 08, 2007
   

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#86 » by andyhop » Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:21 am

KF10 wrote:More than anything, the SF position is still a glaring hole. Salmons didn't produce and mismatched against Beasley. That elected to have Greene come off the bench and defend him.

I want a SF who is tall, strong, can shoot 3s and defend. Is that hard to understand!!??


Thats pretty much what we want on the Wolves as well, so if you find a spare one let us know. Thanks
"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#87 » by KF10 » Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:35 am

I'm not a fan of Wilson Chandler but he fits the bill for the Kings and he's probably the most available SF out there.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,817
And1: 37,039
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#88 » by RIPskaterdude » Wed Feb 8, 2012 7:56 am

We should have traded for Rush when he was available :(
Image
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#89 » by KF10 » Wed Feb 8, 2012 8:01 am

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:We should have traded for Rush when he was available :(


Rush is another candidate for the SF position too! Is he FA this offseason?
User avatar
PaKwAn
Analyst
Posts: 3,006
And1: 1,564
Joined: Dec 04, 2007

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#90 » by PaKwAn » Wed Feb 8, 2012 8:09 am

KF10 wrote:More than anything, the SF position is still a glaring hole. Salmons didn't produce and mismatched against Beasley. That elected to have Greene come off the bench and defend him.

I want a SF who is tall, strong, can shoot 3s and defend. Is that hard to understand!!??


Batum
Wright
Rush

We wont have a chance at george since that guy would be untouchable... I really like this kids potential though!
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#91 » by KF10 » Wed Feb 8, 2012 8:14 am

PaKwAn wrote:
KF10 wrote:More than anything, the SF position is still a glaring hole. Salmons didn't produce and mismatched against Beasley. That elected to have Greene come off the bench and defend him.

I want a SF who is tall, strong, can shoot 3s and defend. Is that hard to understand!!??


Batum
Wright
Rush

We wont have a chance at george since that guy would be untouchable... I really like this kids potential though!


I go after Batum and match anything from the Blazers if I'm Petrie. If not, draft a SF.
User avatar
PaKwAn
Analyst
Posts: 3,006
And1: 1,564
Joined: Dec 04, 2007

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#92 » by PaKwAn » Wed Feb 8, 2012 8:28 am

KF10 wrote:
PaKwAn wrote:
KF10 wrote:More than anything, the SF position is still a glaring hole. Salmons didn't produce and mismatched against Beasley. That elected to have Greene come off the bench and defend him.

I want a SF who is tall, strong, can shoot 3s and defend. Is that hard to understand!!??


Batum
Wright
Rush

We wont have a chance at george since that guy would be untouchable... I really like this kids potential though!


I go after Batum and match anything from the Blazers if I'm Petrie. If not, draft a SF.


+1
I like batum since he is more of a team player that would play within the system and can defend and shoot! We might have a chance to get him as well.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#93 » by SacKingZZZ » Thu Feb 9, 2012 1:08 am

PaKwAn wrote:
KF10 wrote:More than anything, the SF position is still a glaring hole. Salmons didn't produce and mismatched against Beasley. That elected to have Greene come off the bench and defend him.

I want a SF who is tall, strong, can shoot 3s and defend. Is that hard to understand!!??


Batum
Wright
Rush

We wont have a chance at george since that guy would be untouchable... I really like this kids potential though!



If the Kings don't come out of this summer with one of Rush or Batum, something is wrong. Only not if the Kings draft Barnes, Kidd-Gilchrist, or Quincy Miller. Even then, have to take a shot. I was super excited when the rumors popped up about Landry being traded for Rush/McRoberts. Getting Rush and Thornton at the end of the day would be sweet.
User avatar
PaKwAn
Analyst
Posts: 3,006
And1: 1,564
Joined: Dec 04, 2007

Re: Kings @ Wolves 

Post#94 » by PaKwAn » Thu Feb 9, 2012 3:30 am

I would also add wilson chandler into that mix of sf that we should look into...

Return to Sacramento Kings