fishercob wrote:http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/08/kendrick-perkins-rips-lebron-for-tweet-about-blake-dunk/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Gotta love Kendrick Perkins:
“You don’t see Kobe [Bryant] tweeting,” Perkins said. “You don’t see Michael Jordan tweeting. If you’re an elite player, plays like that don’t excite you. At the end of the day, the guys who are playing for the right reasons who are trying to win championships are not worrying about one play.
“They also are not tweeting about themselves talking about going down to No. 2. I just feel [James] is always looking for attention and he wants the world to like him.”
I do sometimes wonder why I bother to listen to ESPN radio, but since I did....
It's amazing how much your pre-set ideas (even worldview, in more important matters) shapes how you see an incident. In this case, most Wiz fans here on this board are pre-disposed to thinking LeBron is a self-absorbed, highly talented player who does seem to be more concerned with being liked, having fun, and putting on a show than he is with being the absolute, don't even think twice about it, best player in the history of the league. [Which, BTW, I think he could be if he had anything near the drive and single-mindedness that MJ or Kobe have.]
So, we see this incident and it confirms our preconceived notions. Even in trying to sound humble (giving Blake Griffin credit), he comes off to me as self-centered as ever. Who ever said he was at #1 in the first place, to "step aside" for BG? And he takes self-referentialism to a whole new level - he doesn't even refer to himself (should that he Himself?) in the third person, he does it in the third-number.
But ESPN has a totally different approach, so sees the situation totally differently. They see it as "fun" that LeBron tweets and connects with his fans. They do think LeBron was being humble, giving credit to Griffin. They think Perkins was being "too sensitive" - as if Perkins sought out Marc Spears, whereas I'm sure Spears asked Perkins about it and he answered the question.
And no one asks - why did LeBron mention Perkins in the tweet at all? When we talk about the Kirk Gibson home run, is it necessary to mention Eckersley was the pitcher who gave it up? Celebrate the guy with the dunk, I get it - and just leave Perk out of it. I have yet to hear anyone on ESPN (where this is mentioned at least once an hour, it seems) make that point.
Don't know what I'm trying to say here, just that it's interesting - and I do think it's instructive in the larger picture. For those who are more liberal politically, they might see Obama as caving in on some issues (Gitmo, tax breaks, etc.) and complain that he's not liberal enough. I assure you that many on the Right saw Bush as a Liberal. If you're predisposed to like a candidate, he may inspire you, or his words seems so perfectly matched to the issue at hand. Or, if you're predisposed to disagree with a candidate's positions, it seems everything he does (verbal patterns, physical tics, etc.) may bother you.
I guess I just wish we could allow ourselves to see each other from outside of our preconceived notions every once in a while. And yes, that means even me/us who dislike so much of the persona LeBron has made/become. After all, his twitter profile has a picture of him with his kids - in that moment, he's just a Dad having fun with those who are most important to him. It's all the rest of the time that he's an a self-absorbed megalomaniac driven to pursue the acceptance he so desperately craves....

Oh, and - screw the tank, let's get a win tonight!!!!
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose