BeKuK wrote:and one more time: What about this conclusion = He didn't play the last one!?
In the article I just quoted, it reveals that he felt well enough to play the morning of the Charlotte game. 1.5 days after the NO minutes. But then at some point between the shoot-around and the game, the decision was made that he not play.
I am not saying that NO game did not inflame his back spasms. I'm merely saying that I don't know that it did. And nothing about Rose's own statements suggest that it did.
And I'm furthermore saying that, regardless, none of this necessarily leads to the conclusion that the Bulls' staff was wrong to test him against NO based on the information they had at the time.
Maybe we should stop "our" discussion, because it's senseless. Also I'm afraid to get suspended.
I'm not a moderator. And even if I were, there is a huge difference between a heated disagreement between interested fans, and something calling for a suspension. I'm sure the actual moderators agree.