ImageImageImage

[game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

SunsRback4Good
RealGM
Posts: 30,418
And1: 12,364
Joined: May 13, 2011
     

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#261 » by SunsRback4Good » Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:01 am

Orange_Blooded wrote:At least it's almost D'Backs season!

But, I will take in as much of Nash in a Suns jersey as I can while I can.


Can't wait for Dbacks season, plus Coyotes looking good now making a playoff push. :D
User avatar
Orange_Blooded
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,874
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 23, 2006
Location: San Diego

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#262 » by Orange_Blooded » Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:06 am

RunDogGun wrote:
Orange_Blooded wrote:
RunDogGun wrote:From what I read, Amare was told that we were going after Turk before Amare chose to leave. We made our best offer to him, nothing we can do there. I didn't like how we used his TPE either. Not only did we get guys and use them the opposite reason for why we got them, but we gave out two second rounders (unprotected) in both Chilldress and Warrick. The NY one we got for Amare is top 55 protected, but we give up good picks for guys we don't use correctly. But what do you expect from an assistant coach posing as a head coach.


He went to NY because we would not guarantee his contract, he didn't choose to leave as much as we showed him the door. We could have signed him prior to him ever reaching FA status but chose not to.


He was uninsurable. Dirk took less money when his contract was up, so Dallas could get more guys around him, and look at that result. Duncan same thing. Nash was a two time MVP, getting much less than what Amare is getting. We offered him the best deal we could. NY can afford to pay him $40-60 million to sit and watch. We couldn't.

Amare could have stayed another year. He opted out. He had one more year on his contract. He left us, just like LeBron left Cleveland.


Not a fair comparison, Lebron burned Cavs fans, Amare left for a better offer. We could have offered Amare the same deal. We chose not to. Don't blame him or compare him to Dirk.

I think it would be much less of a risk to pay Amare, an all pro player who fit perfectly with Nash in our system than to pay a bunch of guys who we know aren't going to have an Amare type impact. If Amare was to sit out one of the five years he was signed for it would still have been a better deal than what we "replaced" him with.
Image
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#263 » by Kerrsed » Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:11 am

Image
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#264 » by RunDogGun » Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:25 am

Orange_Blooded wrote:
RunDogGun wrote:
Amare could have stayed another year. He opted out. He had one more year on his contract. He left us, just like LeBron left Cleveland.


Not a fair comparison, Lebron burned Cavs fans, Amare left for a better offer. We could have offered Amare the same deal. We chose not to. Don't blame him or compare him to Dirk.

I think it would be much less of a risk to pay Amare, an all pro player who fit perfectly with Nash in our system than to pay a bunch of guys who we know aren't going to have an Amare type impact. If Amare was to sit out one of the five years he was signed for it would still have been a better deal than what we "replaced" him with.


Why can't I use Dirk as an example? Both were up for new contracts and one chose to stay for less, and th other chose to leave for more. One resulted in a ring, the other in a sweep. We offered $3 million less than NY. If Amare knew he would be fine and be able to play, then there shouldn't have been an issue. It wasn't our fault that he was uninsurable. He could have played out the year and left, giving him and us another shot at something. He also could have avoided going on that national tour, where he promised every city a ring if they took him, the summer of 2009. However, when given the chance to bring the team he was under contract with, a ring he pulls down that AllPro 6.6 rebounds.

I don't like how they used the money, but I am glad we didn't sign Amare. He'll go down before his contract is up. He added two new injuries since he left us and our training staff felt his contract was a risk. Plus last time we inked him to a big deal, he all of a sudden had stiffness in his knees. :roll:
User avatar
Orange_Blooded
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,874
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 23, 2006
Location: San Diego

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#265 » by Orange_Blooded » Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:53 am

RunDogGun wrote:
Orange_Blooded wrote:
RunDogGun wrote:
Amare could have stayed another year. He opted out. He had one more year on his contract. He left us, just like LeBron left Cleveland.


Not a fair comparison, Lebron burned Cavs fans, Amare left for a better offer. We could have offered Amare the same deal. We chose not to. Don't blame him or compare him to Dirk.

I think it would be much less of a risk to pay Amare, an all pro player who fit perfectly with Nash in our system than to pay a bunch of guys who we know aren't going to have an Amare type impact. If Amare was to sit out one of the five years he was signed for it would still have been a better deal than what we "replaced" him with.


Why can't I use Dirk as an example? Both were up for new contracts and one chose to stay for less, and th other chose to leave for more. One resulted in a ring, the other in a sweep. We offered $3 million less than NY. If Amare knew he would be fine and be able to play, then there shouldn't have been an issue. It wasn't our fault that he was uninsurable. He could have played out the year and left, giving him and us another shot at something. He also could have avoided going on that national tour, where he promised every city a ring if they took him, the summer of 2009. However, when given the chance to bring the team he was under contract with, a ring he pulls down that AllPro 6.6 rebounds.

I don't like how they used the money, but I am glad we didn't sign Amare. He'll go down before his contract is up. He added two new injuries since he left us and our training staff felt his contract was a risk. Plus last time we inked him to a big deal, he all of a sudden had stiffness in his knees. :roll:


Because most players aren't going to take less money in the best interest of the team, it's a business.

We'll just have to disagree about letting Amare walk. I refuse to drink that kool-aid.
Image
Moochthemonkey
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 1,582
Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Location: AZ
 

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#266 » by Moochthemonkey » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:28 am

Orange_Blooded wrote:
We'll just have to disagree about letting Amare walk. I refuse to drink that kool-aid.


How can you label such as kool-aid drinking when the mere difference was insurance reasons? If he wanted to play in Phoenix, he would have stayed. Saying a 3 mil$ difference over 5-6 years, in context with a contract of his magnitude, as being a difference maker is a straw man argument. Even if both teams had offered the exact same contract, I doubt Amare stays...he's always been an egoistical player who wants the spotlight, he wanted to be the center of attention in the second biggest market in the NBA. I'm certainly not advocating the "replacement" of Amare with the likes of Childress, Warrick, and Turkeyglue but not signing Amare to an uninsured contract was the right move. even signing him to the deal we offered is dodgy.

if the Suns had kept Lou the next season, maybe swapped Barbosa for a better defensive guard (it actually turned out to be Gortat- probably better), signed Lee as Amare's replacement more or less, and banked on the continued improvement of Dragic and Lopez, I feel the Suns would have been almost if not as good as the previous year. We certainly would have been overall more balanced. Unfortunately, none of that happened...
RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#267 » by RunDogGun » Sat Feb 18, 2012 9:01 am

Mooch with the logic yet again. :clap:

Orangeblooded, that's fine to disagree on Amare, but don't follow it with the "kool-aide" crap. I wasn't trying to hoodwink you. Amare had options, and he wasn't run out of town. He walked away from a $17 mil guaranteed year to leave early and sign with NY. He chose to leave.
User avatar
GrantHill
Veteran
Posts: 2,680
And1: 74
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
Location: France
   

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#268 » by GrantHill » Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:57 am

Wow I never thought I would say this but I think Frye and Telfair are two of the worst players our team has seen in a long time. I'd rather see Marcus Banks or even Turkoglu instead of them.

You know what the worst thing about this loss is? Nothing changes. There are the same problems in every game and nothing changes. We keep playing guys like Telfair or even Frye who are horrible. Every game I've to see a chucking Frye and Telfair, Lopez or even Warrick. Why does nothing change in their style of play? I haven't watched our last games (except the Lakers game) because I already know what to expect. I really loved our team the last few years but it's tough to watch them right now. If this team stays the same after the All Star Break / trading deadline I'll completely lose my faith in this organization.
Hill on Nash going to the Lakers: “That’s like transferring from Duke and going to Carolina.”
SunsRback4Good
RealGM
Posts: 30,418
And1: 12,364
Joined: May 13, 2011
     

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#269 » by SunsRback4Good » Sat Feb 18, 2012 12:03 pm

GrantHill wrote:Wow I never thought I would say this but I think Frye and Telfair are two of the worst players our team has seen in a long time. I'd rather see Marcus Banks or even Turkoglu instead of them.

You know what the worst thing about this loss is? Nothing changes. There are the same problems in every game and nothing changes. We keep playing guys like Telfair or even Frye who are horrible. Every game I've to see a chucking Frye and Telfair, Lopez or even Warrick. Why does nothing change in their style of play? I haven't watched our last games (except the Lakers game) because I already know what to expect. I really loved our team the last few years but it's tough to watch them right now. If this team stays the same after the All Star Break / trading deadline I'll completely lose my faith in this organization.


+1 couldn't agree more
RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#270 » by RunDogGun » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:22 pm

GrantHill wrote:Wow I never thought I would say this but I think Frye and Telfair are two of the worst players our team has seen in a long time. I'd rather see Marcus Banks or even Turkoglu instead of them.

You know what the worst thing about this loss is? Nothing changes. There are the same problems in every game and nothing changes. We keep playing guys like Telfair or even Frye who are horrible. Every game I've to see a chucking Frye and Telfair, Lopez or even Warrick. Why does nothing change in their style of play? I haven't watched our last games (except the Lakers game) because I already know what to expect. I really loved our team the last few years but it's tough to watch them right now. If this team stays the same after the All Star Break / trading deadline I'll completely lose my faith in this organization.


It's because we have the same dumb coach playing them, and telling them to shoot, shoot, shoot. They are just following orders.
User avatar
SUN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,840
And1: 866
Joined: Feb 21, 2010

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#271 » by SUN » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:42 pm

DirtyDez wrote:3rd worst team in the West, oh how far we've fallen. Can we just go back to these days...

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRmLP8B7zeM[/youtube]

:cry:
Image
User avatar
Orange_Blooded
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,874
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 23, 2006
Location: San Diego

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#272 » by Orange_Blooded » Sun Feb 19, 2012 2:10 am

RunDogGun wrote:Orangeblooded, that's fine to disagree on Amare, but don't follow it with the "kool-aide" crap. I wasn't trying to hoodwink you. Amare had options, and he wasn't run out of town. He walked away from a $17 mil guaranteed year to leave early and sign with NY. He chose to leave.


I was simply referring to it as "Kool-Aid" because it was the same thing we were fed from our front office at the time, I didn't mean any implications toward you personally.
Image
Sunsfan03
Sophomore
Posts: 226
And1: 28
Joined: May 24, 2010

Re: [game 31] Suns @ Lakers - 2/17 

Post#273 » by Sunsfan03 » Sun Feb 19, 2012 2:26 am

GrantHill wrote:Wow I never thought I would say this but I think Frye and Telfair are two of the worst players our team has seen in a long time. I'd rather see Marcus Banks or even Turkoglu instead of them.

You know what the worst thing about this loss is? Nothing changes. There are the same problems in every game and nothing changes. We keep playing guys like Telfair or even Frye who are horrible. Every game I've to see a chucking Frye and Telfair, Lopez or even Warrick. Why does nothing change in their style of play? I haven't watched our last games (except the Lakers game) because I already know what to expect. I really loved our team the last few years but it's tough to watch them right now. If this team stays the same after the All Star Break / trading deadline I'll completely lose my faith in this organization.


+3 i believe we should amnesty frye next season over childress.....

Return to Phoenix Suns