Our New Needs
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Our New Needs
-
- Junior
- Posts: 287
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 10, 2011
- Location: Brooklyn Center, MN
Our New Needs
With the emergence of Pek, we need to re-address what we need out of our wing players. I think we now need to go find a couple of guys who are first and foremost defensive players who can be smart with the ball on offence but don't need the ball to be effective. Someone like Trenton Hassel comes to mind.
The reason I say this is with Love and Pek looking like they will be putting up 20+ points each per game, we just need to find the 12-15 ppg guys. I think with the way Beas is developing his game since he came back, he could be our perfect 6th man and someone to pick up the scoring on the nights Love or Pek don't have it. Wes has been improving as the season has gone on defensively, and he's looked confident on offence these past two games. Maybe he could be one of the defensive minded guys I mentioned above? If he can fill that role, for the other wing it would be perfect to find a veteran to help guide this young team.
But from my end, that's as far as I can take it, I'm not sure what players fit the mold I described above. Anybody know who can be our new Trenton Hassle?
The reason I say this is with Love and Pek looking like they will be putting up 20+ points each per game, we just need to find the 12-15 ppg guys. I think with the way Beas is developing his game since he came back, he could be our perfect 6th man and someone to pick up the scoring on the nights Love or Pek don't have it. Wes has been improving as the season has gone on defensively, and he's looked confident on offence these past two games. Maybe he could be one of the defensive minded guys I mentioned above? If he can fill that role, for the other wing it would be perfect to find a veteran to help guide this young team.
But from my end, that's as far as I can take it, I'm not sure what players fit the mold I described above. Anybody know who can be our new Trenton Hassle?
Re: Our New Needs
- Saltine
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,396
- And1: 1,002
- Joined: Jul 20, 2003
- Location: Land o' Lakes
-
Re: Our New Needs
I know Kahn is hoping that Martell Webster can be that guy, he is getting back into shape and Adelman is giving him a shot. A defensive wing who can hit the open three consistently is what we need, he played that part well before the back surgeries...
Re: Our New Needs
- big3_8_19_21
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,113
- And1: 421
- Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Re: Our New Needs
Someone who could make 3s and defend ideally. Bruce Bowen types would be ideal. Not that there are tons of Bruce Bowen types to be had...
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Re: Our New Needs
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Our New Needs
Batum fits that bill.
Re: Our New Needs
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,928
- And1: 17
- Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Re: Our New Needs
Putting one of these three next to a healthy Webster would be nice.
Kawhi Leonard
Dorell Wright
George Hill
Kawhi Leonard
Dorell Wright
George Hill
Re: Our New Needs
-
- Junior
- Posts: 287
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 10, 2011
- Location: Brooklyn Center, MN
Re: Our New Needs
B Calrissian wrote:Putting one of these three next to a healthy Webster would be nice.
Kawhi Leonard
Dorell Wright
George Hill
Yeah, those would work. I'd like Batum too but I think he's gonna be out of our price range.
Re: Our New Needs
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Our New Needs
You still need at least one above average offensive player on the wing. I actually am a big fan of the proposed trades I've seen lately with the Wolves getting both Batum and Matthews from Portland.
And a "healthy" Webster is pretty much wishful thinking, sad to say.
And a "healthy" Webster is pretty much wishful thinking, sad to say.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Our New Needs
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,886
- And1: 374
- Joined: Oct 21, 2010
Re: Our New Needs
A shooter who can knock down wide open shots consistantly would be a nice start.
Re: Our New Needs
- [RCG]
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,047
- And1: 135
- Joined: May 24, 2010
- Location: Saint Paul
Re: Our New Needs
Esohny wrote:You still need at least one above average offensive player on the wing. I actually am a big fan of the proposed trades I've seen lately with the Wolves getting both Batum and Matthews from Portland.
And a "healthy" Webster is pretty much wishful thinking, sad to say.
Like this:http://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6029689?
+ Throw in the Utah pick going to Charlotte.
Rubio/Barea
Matthews/Eillngton/Lee
Batum/Maggette
Love/Beasley/Tolliver
Pekovic/Randolph
PLAYOFFS!
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Re: Our New Needs
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,885
- And1: 264
- Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Re: Our New Needs
WesJ4 wrote:A shooter who can knock down wide open shots consistantly would be a nice start.
I really think that Daequan cook for Ridnour is a definite possibility considering that the thunder need a a back up pg and thabo is coming back soon
Re: Our New Needs
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: Our New Needs
We need a SG who can create his own shot. If he can make shots and play defense that would be a huge plus. Between Martell and Wes I think the SF spot would be good enough for this team for the time being.
Re: Our New Needs
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,803
- And1: 22,392
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Our New Needs
weasel wrote:Someone like Trenton Hassel comes to mind.
He's a little old for our core, don't you think?

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Our New Needs
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,550
- And1: 882
- Joined: Sep 05, 2009
Re: Our New Needs
moss_is_1 wrote:We need a SG who can create his own shot. If he can make shots and play defense that would be a huge plus. Between Martell and Wes I think the SF spot would be good enough for this team for the time being.
The Portland guards can't create their own shot, if that's your criteria most of the players we've been talking about are off the list.
Re: Our New Needs
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,803
- And1: 22,392
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Our New Needs
moss_is_1 wrote:We need a SG who can create his own shot. If he can make shots and play defense that would be a huge plus. Between Martell and Wes I think the SF spot would be good enough for this team for the time being.
Malcolm Lee.
Creates his own shots? Check.
Play defense? Check.
Now how consistently and at what level remains to be seen, but I think our coaching staff is very high on this kid.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Our New Needs
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,550
- And1: 882
- Joined: Sep 05, 2009
Re: Our New Needs
I think we need a SG who can play D and hit a 3. That seems to be our 2 biggest weaknesses there.
Re: Our New Needs
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: Our New Needs
Narf wrote:moss_is_1 wrote:We need a SG who can create his own shot. If he can make shots and play defense that would be a huge plus. Between Martell and Wes I think the SF spot would be good enough for this team for the time being.
The Portland guards can't create their own shot, if that's your criteria most of the players we've been talking about are off the list.
Which ones? Wes Matthews isn't a great shot-creator but he'd be a huge upgrade, and he plays solid defense / makes shots.
Batum is more of a SF, but he's pretty good at creating his own shot because he has a nice handle, his problem is lack of opportunity and aggression(at times).
Re: Our New Needs
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,004
- And1: 6,020
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Our New Needs
any numbers floating around on cap projection for next year and what the Wolves have to work with in the offseason

Re: Our New Needs
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,731
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: Our New Needs
Batum does not have a great handle and is not a good shot creator but he is a very good defensive player and shooter who because of his length can get his shot off against most wings. He's clearly been Portlands second best player over the past month. I dont think they move him and I think they'll match any offer this offseason. He'd be a great fit here though.
If we make a move before the deadline I see Martin as a possibility and if we wait until free.agency I could see us going after Mayo.
If we make a move before the deadline I see Martin as a possibility and if we wait until free.agency I could see us going after Mayo.
Re: Our New Needs
- [RCG]
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,047
- And1: 135
- Joined: May 24, 2010
- Location: Saint Paul
Re: Our New Needs
Devilzsidewalk wrote:any numbers floating around on cap projection for next year and what the Wolves have to work with in the offseason
Depends on what Kahn decides to do.
If we stay the course Tolliver will expire, Randolph & Beasley will be R-FAs, Webster will need to be bought out & Miller said he's retiring. If this happens, we will have very little cap space to work with.
If however, Kahn decides to be aggressive we can rescind our rights on Randolph & Beasley, let Tolliver expire, buy-out Webster, Miller will retire, then we can trade some guys like Milicic, Ridnour, Barea, Johnson for expirings and have a considerable amount of cap space to work with.
So it all depends.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Re: Our New Needs
- Saltine
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,396
- And1: 1,002
- Joined: Jul 20, 2003
- Location: Land o' Lakes
-
Re: Our New Needs
Quoting myself from another thread 
Assuming we do not pay AR, Beas, Webster, Miller or resign Tolliver, the team is committed to $49,838,457 in cash next season, $8.2 million in cap space. If Kahn trades Miller and Websters expiring contracts getting out of the money they are guaranteed next season we'd have $9.654 million. If he wants to he can amnesty Darko, which I doubt, but he can, then we'd have $14.882 million. He can easily move Luke's $4million contract anytime. So we do have the cash around to make a run at Batum for instance.

Assuming we do not pay AR, Beas, Webster, Miller or resign Tolliver, the team is committed to $49,838,457 in cash next season, $8.2 million in cap space. If Kahn trades Miller and Websters expiring contracts getting out of the money they are guaranteed next season we'd have $9.654 million. If he wants to he can amnesty Darko, which I doubt, but he can, then we'd have $14.882 million. He can easily move Luke's $4million contract anytime. So we do have the cash around to make a run at Batum for instance.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves