This trade is based on a few assumptions......
*The Lakers (Jim Buss?) want to win now but cut costs. They need PG and bench help.
*The Wolves want to add to their blooming team and have been unhappy with Wes Johnson.
*The Celtics are in blow up mode, but they think they're players in the 2012 FA market.
*The Pacers are in win now mode. They want to have a team that will be able to contend now.
Lakers;
In - Paul Pierce, Darren Collison, Michael Beasley, Brandon Bass, IND 2013 #1
Out - Pau Gasol, Luke Walton, Matt Barnes
Wolves;
In - Paul George, Dante Jones, Luke Walton
Out - Michael Beasley, Wes Johnson, Anthony Randolph, UTH 2012 #1
Celtics;
In - Roy Hibbert, Wes Johnson, Anthony Randolph, Matt Barnes, Louis Amundson, UTH 2012 #1
Out - Paul Pierce, Rajon Rondo, Brandon Bass
Pacers;
In - Pau Gasol, Rajon Rondo
Out - Paul George, Roy Hibbert, Darren Collison, Dante Jones, Louis Amunsdson, 2013 IND #1
Why 4 Boston
The biggest question mark in this proposed deal is Boston. In a best case scenario they lure Deron Williams and Dwight Howard to Boston. KG and Ray Allen get renounced and resign for $2.5 each. With Boston still holding Jeff Greens bird rights, he resigns and gets to play with Hibbert again. Hibbert is the perfect type of big to have a "twin towers" setup with Howard. Hibbert can shot, pass and play the high post. If this scenario doesn't happen then Boston ends up with young talent, future picks and saves a ton of money.
Roy Hibbert (25)
Dwight Howard (26)
Jeff Green (25)
Ray Allen (36)
Deron Williams (27) Bench of KG, Johnson, Bradley, JJJ, few 2012 picks
Why 4 Minny
Simple. They add another young piece without tapping into their core players. Paul George is a stud and would fit in very well with Rubio, Derrick Williams, Love.
Why 4 Pacers
IMO....instant power team in the east. Starting five of;
Rondo
Hill
Granger
West
Gasol
Nuff said.
Why 4 Lakers
Lakers get major scoring help from PP and Beasley. They get a young PG in Collison and instant offense of the bench from Bass. Starting five of;
Collison
Kobe
Pierce
Beasley / Bass
Bynum
Laker fans might not think this is full value for Gasol, but IMO they've played there cards and have decreased Pau's trade value. Added bonuses to this deal for the Lakers would be;
Pierce makes less money then Gasol and the final year of his deal isn't guaranteed.
Future #1 pick
Looking toward the future the Lakers will have some young pieces in Bynum, Collison and Beasley.
Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 836
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: Celtic Country
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
Wolves say yes.
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,928
- And1: 17
- Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
Wolves and Lakers are stealing value from the Pacers and Celtics. Pacers should be keeping their pick and Celtics should get Collison. We aren't getting George unless we are trading Williams.
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
- [RCG]
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,047
- And1: 135
- Joined: May 24, 2010
- Location: Saint Paul
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
I thought value was okay for what we are giving/getting but Lakers suck value out of this trade big time. Way too good for them.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
I question whether Indiana does this, too. They are doing pretty well right now and are high on both Hibbert and George. I guess if they want to go into full scale win-now mode, they might pull the trigger, but I doubt it.
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
- KG_Wolves
- Starter
- Posts: 2,249
- And1: 532
- Joined: Apr 14, 2009
-
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
Indiana gets asss raped in this by a 20 ft pole.
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,051
- And1: 79
- Joined: Apr 06, 2010
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
Indy gets boned.
Turnover_21 wrote:So who do we get? Capspace? Is Capspace white?
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
- eyeteeth
- Starter
- Posts: 2,109
- And1: 147
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
- Location: somewhere on the Front Range
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
Yeah, my first thought here was that Indy would never do this. I wanted to wait and see what other people thought, and well, I agree. 


Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 11
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 06, 2012
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
Wolves say yes.
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,004
- And1: 6,020
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 14
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jun 21, 2011
Re: Lakers / Wolves / Celtics / Pacers *BLOCKBUSTER*
KG_Wolves wrote:Indiana gets asss ***** in this by a 20 ft pole.
This. Terrible trade for the pacers.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves