The Conundrum that is LeBron James

Moderator: Doctor MJ

User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,154
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#101 » by Wannabe MEP » Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:15 pm

mopper8 wrote:Heat's starting unit is now at 111.4 Ortg. Healthy Wade has made a world of difference.

As compared to last season, Miami:

-Moves the ball on offense much better
-Moves off the ball much better
-Has far more stability at the point guard spot
-Has a deeper and healthier bench
-Is no longer running out a string of immobile dinosaurs at C

There isn't any actual evidence that LeBron + Wade is any better than last year offensively. 111.4 is worse than all of the following Heat units from last season (min 100 minutes:

Arroyo-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Ilgauskas
Arroyo-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Anthony
Chalmers-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Ilgauskas
Chalmers-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Anthony
Bibby-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Dampier

111.4 is also worse than the following Heat units from this season (min 40 minutes):

Cole-Battie-Miller-LeBron-Haslem
Chalmers-Jones-LeBron-Bosh-Anthony
Cole-Wade-Miller-Haslem-Bosh

111.4 is of course worse offensively than several other units around the league this year. For example, the Suns starters (38-year-old Steve Nash + 4 role players) are better offensively than the Heat starters.

mopper8 wrote:Miami has the best halfcourt Ortg in the league according to Couper Moorehead.

This stat is per team, not per unit. The greatest strength of this Heat team is their depth of stars. Nobody else can take out two stars and still leave one on the court.



The point is, nothing you said is the least bit surprising. Just like last year, this Heat team is very, very good. Just like last year, their collection of star power has been dominant against average NBA competition. And just like last year, they may very well be susceptible to a complete team with better fitting pieces. The biggest question is whether there is such a team this year.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,154
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#102 » by Wannabe MEP » Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:25 pm

Oh, and 15 of his 20 most-used units in his last year in Cleveland had a better Off Rtg than that 111.4.
Apathy
Banned User
Posts: 2,583
And1: 39
Joined: Aug 25, 2011

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#103 » by Apathy » Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:56 am

Los Soles wrote:He's just a really good--but really expensive--role player.


:lol:

los soles you're mad sensitive. you're said some flat-out wrong and vapid things in this thread. instead of just manning up and admitting error, you do backflips, bust out overplayed sarcasm and come off absurdly condescending and equally ill-informed.

it's clear you have an agenda and/or are too sensitive to discuss this (and possibly any) topic with any sort of nuance
User avatar
Hambone93
Starter
Posts: 2,455
And1: 501
Joined: Jan 15, 2012
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#104 » by Hambone93 » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:03 am

You use alot of words to say nothing. It's quite fascinating.
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#105 » by mopper8 » Sat Feb 25, 2012 3:51 am

The Chalmer/Wade/Lebron/Bosh/Anthony unit is now up to an Ortg of 113, a full 10 points above league average,

But imagine how good they'd be if the pieces actually fit!
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,154
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#106 » by Wannabe MEP » Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:23 am

Impressive that I can be "flat-out wrong" while saying nothing. That's quite an accomplishment.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,154
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#107 » by Wannabe MEP » Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:59 am

mopper, I'd love to engage with you without the dismissive sarcasm

mopper8 wrote:The Chalmer/Wade/Lebron/Bosh/Anthony unit is now up to an Ortg of 113, a full 10 points above league average

Do you understand why I don't feel this means much (yet)? You keep comparing their offensive efficiency to things like league average and team averages, when I'm comparing units to units. This is a big difference. Still, 113 is very good. The problem in my opinion (which doesn't go away even if this rises to 115 or 116) is that:

    1) LeBron was on better offensive units with the Cavs.
    2) There are better offensive units on this year's team that don't use the Wade-LeBron-Bosh combo.
    3) There are several better offensive units around the league this year.
    4) This isn't better than similar units from last year's team, units that subsequently struggled in the playoffs.
Ultimately, I believe the expectations are higher for this crew. You take the best small forward, one of the two best shooting guards, and one of the 3 best offensive bigs, and we expect something special from their top unit. We certainly expect them to be better offensively than the Cavs units, right? Apparently you disagree?
GreenHat
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,985
And1: 340
Joined: Jan 01, 2011

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#108 » by GreenHat » Thu Mar 1, 2012 6:04 pm

Making any kinds of fine comparisons using units over 30ish games is dumb.

An Ortg over under 300 minutes has all kinds of statistical noise and the difference between 110 and 120 could just be nothing.

Expecting a particular 5 man combination to be the best 5 man combination out of hundreds of combinations over a small sample size is absurd.

If a raffle has 1000 numbers, you're probably going to lose even if you're number is 5 times more likely to come up than anyone else's number.
Your emotions fuel the narratives that you create. You see what you want to see. You believe what you want to believe. You ascribe meaning when it is not there. You create significance when it is not present.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,154
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#109 » by Wannabe MEP » Thu Mar 1, 2012 10:46 pm

GreenHat wrote:Making any kinds of fine comparisons using units over 30ish games is dumb.

Minor point in the thread that someone else keyed on.

GreenHat wrote:Expecting a particular 5 man combination to be the best 5 man combination out of hundreds of combinations over a small sample size is absurd.

If a raffle has 1000 numbers, you're probably going to lose even if you're number is 5 times more likely to come up than anyone else's number.

I certainly wasn't comparing them to 1000 units or "hundreds of combinations." I was only comparing them to other units with a lot of minutes. We can draw that line wherever you want to: minimum 100 minutes? only starting units? top 50 units by minutes?

But again, minor point. The larger argument is about multiple units stretching over last season, the playoffs, and this season.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,154
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#110 » by Wannabe MEP » Thu Mar 1, 2012 11:00 pm

Looking at the combined Off Rtg of 2011 playoff units, minimum 20 minutes.

Wade + LeBron: 103.11
Terry + Nowitzki: 128.65
Apathy
Banned User
Posts: 2,583
And1: 39
Joined: Aug 25, 2011

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#111 » by Apathy » Fri Mar 2, 2012 5:24 am

GreenHat
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,985
And1: 340
Joined: Jan 01, 2011

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#112 » by GreenHat » Fri Mar 2, 2012 5:32 pm

Los Soles wrote:Looking at the combined Off Rtg of 2011 playoff units, minimum 20 minutes.

Wade + LeBron: 103.11
Terry + Nowitzki: 128.65


What is the minutes on that?

And the Heat played much better defenses last playoffs. They played the 1st, 2nd, 7th and 8th teams by Drtg

Chicago gave up 100.3, Boston 100.3, Philly 105.0 and Dallas 105.0

The Mavs got to play the Heat 103.5, Lakers 104.3, Blazer 107.1 and OKC 107.2
Your emotions fuel the narratives that you create. You see what you want to see. You believe what you want to believe. You ascribe meaning when it is not there. You create significance when it is not present.
GreenHat
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,985
And1: 340
Joined: Jan 01, 2011

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#113 » by GreenHat » Fri Mar 2, 2012 5:36 pm

Los Soles wrote:
GreenHat wrote:Making any kinds of fine comparisons using units over 30ish games is dumb.

Minor point in the thread that someone else keyed on.


Awesome.

I'm not going to read this whole thread that's months old.

GreenHat wrote:Expecting a particular 5 man combination to be the best 5 man combination out of hundreds of combinations over a small sample size is absurd.

If a raffle has 1000 numbers, you're probably going to lose even if you're number is 5 times more likely to come up than anyone else's number.

I certainly wasn't comparing them to 1000 units or "hundreds of combinations." I was only comparing them to other units with a lot of minutes. We can draw that line wherever you want to: minimum 100 minutes? only starting units? top 50 units by minutes?

But again, minor point. The larger argument is about multiple units stretching over last season, the playoffs, and this season.


Ok do a minimum of 1000 minutes for this season.

100 minutes tells me very little.
Your emotions fuel the narratives that you create. You see what you want to see. You believe what you want to believe. You ascribe meaning when it is not there. You create significance when it is not present.
User avatar
Hambone93
Starter
Posts: 2,455
And1: 501
Joined: Jan 15, 2012
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#114 » by Hambone93 » Mon Mar 5, 2012 10:48 pm

Los Soles wrote:Impressive that I can be "flat-out wrong" while saying nothing. That's quite an accomplishment.


I was responding to apathy. I like your thread, it has substance and interesting analysis. Sorry I didn't make that clear.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,154
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#115 » by Wannabe MEP » Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:26 am

Hambone93 wrote:
Los Soles wrote:Impressive that I can be "flat-out wrong" while saying nothing. That's quite an accomplishment.


I was responding to apathy. I like your thread, it has substance and interesting analysis. Sorry I didn't make that clear.

:lol: Ok, thanks. But there goes my accomplishment.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,154
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#116 » by Wannabe MEP » Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:36 am

GreenHat wrote:
Los Soles wrote:Looking at the combined Off Rtg of 2011 playoff units, minimum 20 minutes.

Wade + LeBron: 103.11
Terry + Nowitzki: 128.65

What is the minutes on that?

I didn't add it up exactly, but more than 600 for Wade + LeBron and about 400 for Terry + Nowitzki.

GreenHat wrote:Ok do a minimum of 1000 minutes for this season.

There are no units close to that yet this season.
User avatar
tclg
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,194
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2007
Location: Chicago

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#117 » by tclg » Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:49 pm

What units have the highest amount of minutes together
Rose-Brewer-Deng-Boozer-Noah the Bulls Number 1 Unit in minuts has 250 min with an Off Rating of 115, And the defensive rating is 92. The next unit has like 80 min less.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,154
And1: 1,852
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#118 » by Wannabe MEP » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:22 pm

Nash-Hill-Dudley-Frye-Gortat -- Off Rtg: 114.75 (661.55 minutes)
Chalmers-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Anthony -- Off Rtg: 111.08 (420.37 minutes)

Suns starters also have better overall rating and adjusted +/-. So that would be a 38-year-old, a 39-year-old, and 3 borderline bench players clearly outperforming the Three Stooges' go-to unit.

I call that "fit."
User avatar
rrravenred
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,118
And1: 593
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Location: Pulling at the loose threads of arguments since 2006

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#119 » by rrravenred » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:42 am

Out of interest, what're the Def Rtgs for those two lineups?
ElGee wrote:You, my friend, have shoved those words into my mouth, which is OK because I'm hungry.


Got fallacy?
User avatar
tclg
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,194
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2007
Location: Chicago

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#120 » by tclg » Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:58 am

for ths first one there defensive rating is 101

Return to Statistical Analysis