ImageImageImage

Are Love and Rubio good enough?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,381
And1: 12,264
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#1 » by Worm Guts » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:36 pm

Are they good enough to be the best 2 players on a championship caliber team? Or are we still looking for our superstar? I bring this up because I still see people occasionally talking about how we need a number one option, but Love is already one of the top 5 most productive players in the NBA. We obviously need an upgrade on the wing in any situation, but what caliber player do we need?
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#2 » by [RCG] » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:39 pm

We need a capable wing player. If you look at the PER of Beasley, Johnson, Webster, Ellington they're terrible. I don't think we necessarily need a true #1. Love isn't going to make his own shots but he produces like a #1 and Rubio can make the players around him better if they aren't total boneheads. Above average wings would do wonders for this team.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Piecake
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,885
And1: 264
Joined: Nov 13, 2010

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#3 » by Piecake » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:43 pm

Worm Guts wrote:Are they good enough to be the best 2 players on a championship caliber team? Or are we still looking for our superstar? I bring this up because I still see people occasionally talking about how we need a number one option, but Love is already one of the top 5 most productive players in the NBA. We obviously need an upgrade on the wing in any situation, but what caliber player do we need?


I think they are good enough. I know people think we need a number 1 option on the wing, but I really dont think so. I think we would be better served by having wings our there who can defend, hit the 3, and move well without the ball since our ball dominant player is Rubio, not our wings.

I think how well we are playing right now with how terrible our wing play is should give credence that we really dont need an allstar at the wing, we just need players who are competent to good. Will we be favored to win it all with a lineup like that? I dont know, but I think we would have a chance
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#4 » by jpatrick » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:51 pm

I think we need a stud scorer on the wing. Love and Rubio are both studs because they have such unique skills but neither is a go to one on one scorer you need to be a championship team. I dont think that wing has to be our best player, just a gifted scorer who can get his own shot.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#5 » by C.lupus » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:56 pm

I think they are good enough, too. We just need some competence at the wings. Somebody who can consistently hit a shot and, ideally, have the ability to create occasionally. Seeing Rubio and Love right now at 21 and 23 years old, it's almost scary to think what they could be in 5 years, just hitting their prime.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#6 » by moss_is_1 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:59 pm

They should both be top 15-20 players in the league during their prime IMO. That should be good enough, we don't need to find a player that will be better then both of them, but someone who will be a top ~30 player in the league on the wing probably?
User avatar
SportsGuy8
Starter
Posts: 2,160
And1: 1,050
Joined: Jun 17, 2006

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#7 » by SportsGuy8 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:20 pm

Along with strong Pek, they're good enough for a championship IF they can get great role-players at SG & SF positions. And by great I mean Battier, Bruce Bowen type (maybe not that great, as such players are obviously very hard to find, but still close to that level). Defenders that can hit open shots.

It would be a nice bonus if such a player was also capable of creating his own shot, but then we're talking about All-Stars, and it's obviously unlikely the Wolves will be able to get such a player.

Example of a championship starting 5 (obviously the Wolves can't get Afflalo & Batum, it's just an example):
Rubio
Afflalo
Batum
Love
Pek

That would be :droop: . :) Rubio, 3 great shooters and a BEAST. With probably the best defensive back-court & wing in the league.
Image
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#8 » by C.lupus » Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:33 pm

SportsGuy8 wrote:
Example of a championship starting 5 (obviously the Wolves can't get Afflalo & Batum, it's just an example):
Rubio
Afflalo
Batum
Love
Pek

That would be :droop: . :) Rubio, 3 great shooters and a BEAST. With probably the best defensive back-court & wing in the league.

That lineup would do some real damage and it's actually feasible to assemble.
User avatar
zerogravity15
Sophomore
Posts: 177
And1: 12
Joined: Sep 20, 2008

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#9 » by zerogravity15 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:43 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:They should both be top 15-20 players in the league during their prime IMO. That should be good enough, we don't need to find a player that will be better then both of them, but someone who will be a top ~30 player in the league on the wing probably?


This is what I'm thinking. We need another player that's top 25 or 30. Preferably a wing that can score 15-20 ppg consistently and play good defense on the perimeter.
User avatar
SportsGuy8
Starter
Posts: 2,160
And1: 1,050
Joined: Jun 17, 2006

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#10 » by SportsGuy8 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:52 pm

C.lupus wrote:
SportsGuy8 wrote:
Example of a championship starting 5 (obviously the Wolves can't get Afflalo & Batum, it's just an example):
Rubio
Afflalo
Batum
Love
Pek

That would be :droop: . :) Rubio, 3 great shooters and a BEAST. With probably the best defensive back-court & wing in the league.

That lineup would do some real damage and it's actually feasible to assemble.

Yeah, the good thing is that with some luck, you can get such players with low 1st round picks. Getting a player like Batum is hard, because it was a specific situation (he only dropped to 25 because there were worries about his heart problems), but a player like Afflalo was not only just the 27th pick, but he was also let go by another team (Pistons), traded for basically nothing.

Getting another top 20 guy is obviously highly unlikely, but getting players like Afflalo is actually quite possible (players like Batum a bit less possible), provided your FO knows what they're doing (+ some luck is always needed).

P.s.: Some even go undrafted. Bowen, or a guy like Wesley Matthews ... Far from perfect, but a HUGE upgrade.
Image
LordBaldric
General Manager
Posts: 7,611
And1: 1,970
Joined: Jul 14, 2006

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#11 » by LordBaldric » Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:13 pm

If Pek continues his beastly play and Rubio improves his shot over the next couple years I think a couple legit good players at the 2 & 3 might be enough to make us contenders. I we got another superstar player, watch out NBA!
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,803
And1: 22,392
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#12 » by Klomp » Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:55 pm

It depends on who we get as our third wheel. Pek is not the third best player on a title team. I don't think we need to have a LeBron or Durant, but I think an Iguodala or Granger would make us a title contender.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,236
And1: 17,158
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#13 » by Calinks » Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:56 pm

I think they will be. We need that third guy and good role players.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
User avatar
southern wolf
General Manager
Posts: 9,854
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Australia
   

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#14 » by southern wolf » Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:01 am

Assuming they keep improving into their primes, I think we just need a third guy on the wing who can give us around 20 ppg and solid defence, Beasley was close to that last season... without the defence.
User avatar
mark blunt
Sophomore
Posts: 174
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 14, 2009

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#15 » by mark blunt » Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:24 am

I mean it's not my money but we could do worse than adding a couple extra million to a Batum offer this summer. That may be the difference between becoming a top 6-8 team for the next 5 years and fighting for a playoff spot for the last 3 years of the Love era.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:I am envious of your team. Apologize to GM Kahn for me. Just an excellent securing of assets albeit in a round about way.
His method was goofy and quirky at first, wasting picks on all those PG's but in the end he seems to have gotten it done.
User avatar
jade_hippo
Starter
Posts: 2,383
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!
 

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#16 » by jade_hippo » Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:48 am

If you look at our team right now, adding one player like Reddick or Ray Allen makes us a dangerous team. I think that right there is all the proof we need to say Rubio/Love/Pek are enough. Like someone else said, none of those 3 are really superstars, but they have such unique skill sets it just seems to work.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,524
And1: 4,983
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#17 » by theGreatRC » Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:50 am

Love is good enough, Rubio needs to add a go-to move to be "Good enough". Right now RR is a facilitator and great defender, but not someone you can rely on to consistently get you a big bucket. (Although he has gotten buckets for us early, he needs a move that can't be **** with..like Rose's floater/Parker's floater/Melo's jab to pull-up J, etc)

We don't need a #1 option, we just need a wing player capable of creating his own offense so Love isn't doubled in the playoffs if we really want to win the whole thing. 1on1 Love can do his thing against 90% of the players in the league.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
User avatar
kmgarnett21
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,868
And1: 398
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
       

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#18 » by kmgarnett21 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:55 am

Like others have said, Love/Rubio are good enough but this team is just missing a decent to great SG. Of course, getting an All Star SG would be awesome. But if you put a JJ Redick or Wes Matthews on this team, and they are a legit threat in the playoffs.
Busch Legion
Rookie
Posts: 1,041
And1: 14
Joined: Oct 08, 2007
Location: North Dakota

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#19 » by Busch Legion » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:23 am

Right now? I don't think so... But if Love keeps on improving like he has, and if Rubio can improve his shot a bit, yeah they can be.
pumunga
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 09, 2010

Re: Are Love and Rubio good enough? 

Post#20 » by pumunga » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:50 am

as is, as a team, good nuff

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves