ImageImageImageImageImage

LO trade was the right move (wants back to LA)p 5

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

LO trade was the right move (wants back to LA)p 5 

Post#1 » by dockingsched » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:21 am

I've been meaning to create this thread and I figured this is a good time since we still don't know what the TPE that was created can bring back.


Here's what Mitch said to defend the trade at the time:

Lamar was sent to Dallas because he requested to be traded," said Kupchak, who referenced Odom's frustration with being involved in the blocked Paul trade. "In this case, he couldn't get over the fact that something like that could took place. I was hoping that things would change in a day or two but his representative called me on Saturday and said that's not going to change."

The Lakers moved surprisingly quickly to trade Odom. Kobe Bryant made a trade demand in May 2007. He's still here.

"I wouldn't lump Kobe and Lamar into the same category when talking about those same two situations," Kupchak said. "Yeah, we could have said, 'Lamar, we're not going to trade you,' and waited to see what was going to happen in the next week or two, but we chose not to do that.

"The window to make a deal in this environment where you really can get back flexibility, it goes away in the snap of the fingers. So to have waited two or three weeks would have just prolonged an environment with Lamar when he's not at practice and would have sucked energy away from the team. We might not have had a better opportunity."


Here's what LO has done this season after the vetoed Cp3 trade:

7.7 ppg, 35.7 fg%, 4.5 rpg, 25.9 3p%, 9.8 PER

he's basically having a career low in every single statistical category and its not even close in most cases. it appears that he just has not even able to get over the failed trade and it really appears that mitch and the FO did the right thing regardless of what they are able to do with the TPE and DAL 1st.

LO was lost as soon as that trade went public and it was a great decision to move him asap.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
Anklebreaker702
RealGM
Posts: 13,946
And1: 164
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
   

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#2 » by Anklebreaker702 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:28 am

I agree. LO is fragile mentally. Like you said once the trade went public he was lost. Not just to the Lakers but to basketball for at least this whole season.
VETERAN LAKER FAN
AlexBarrera1
Rookie
Posts: 1,049
And1: 4
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: Camarillo, CA

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#3 » by AlexBarrera1 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:28 am

It's gonna come down to what we get with that TPE though.
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#4 » by Jetset » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:30 am

Lamar's going through some tough times. Didn't his chauffeur run over someone or something like that? Then getting traded from the team he loved, and now his father's ill.

I think we did the best thing based on the fact that he's the one who requested a trade. Pau sucked it up and is playing, he could've done the same.
User avatar
Wavy Q
RealGM
Posts: 24,317
And1: 2,390
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Location: Pull Up
     

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#5 » by Wavy Q » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:33 am

Trading him was the right move but i still feel we could have gotten more value for him than a TPE.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#6 » by dockingsched » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:34 am

AlexBarrera1 wrote:It's gonna come down to what we get with that TPE though.


i disagree. if the lakers would have kept him, dumping his contract and getting a 1st out of it would be a pipe dream. beasley? sessions? calderon? felton? all these guys wouldn't even be options cause no one would want to take on LO's 9mil salary. lakers would have no assets outside of their own 1st and would not even be any better the way LO has been playing.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
Anklebreaker702
RealGM
Posts: 13,946
And1: 164
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
   

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#7 » by Anklebreaker702 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:36 am

Stephano wrote:Trading him was the right move but i still feel we could have gotten more value for him than a TPE.

How? Remember Lamar took a pay cut so the money has to match.
VETERAN LAKER FAN
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,891
And1: 2,999
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#8 » by tugs » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:42 am

he can't get over the fact that the team he loves playing for traded him. should have come in shape LO. :nonono: add the fact that Mavs fans were really high on this deal since they are getting the reigning SMOY and he can't deliver and live up to the expectations.

great move by the FO but I fell bad for LO.
User avatar
Danny Darko
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 18,633
And1: 5,986
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
         

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#9 » by Danny Darko » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:42 am

but if we had LO could we have had him go to the Magic with Bynum and kept Pau? I guess it's possible the pick and trade exception are as valuable or more than LO in trade bait, but assuming he played more like himself with us (I think he would have), I think it's possible Orlando would have gone for a package with him over a package with the money and pick.
Image
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,891
And1: 2,999
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#10 » by tugs » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:47 am

Pau and D12. :droop:
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#11 » by dockingsched » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:55 am

Danny Darko wrote:but if we had LO could we have had him go to the Magic with Bynum and kept Pau? I guess it's possible the pick and trade exception are as valuable or more than LO in trade bait, but assuming he played more like himself with us (I think he would have), I think it's possible Orlando would have gone for a package with him over a package with the money and pick.


i don't think there's any evidence to support that idea unfortunately.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#12 » by DEEP3CL » Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:01 am

People kill me with this "got more than the TPE".....stay in reality and realize the man was 31 at the time of the trade going on 32. You're not going to get a 1st rounder nor a young prospect for a dude on the down swing in his career. There is statistical proof for almost every big that has played this game showing a decline in almost every stat across the board after age 32. There is no refuting this.

The TPE was the most valuable asset coming from that trade. Do people not understand the business side of the sport or what ?
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
yows
Freshman
Posts: 86
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2012

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#13 » by yows » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:09 am

DEEP3CL wrote:People kill me with this "got more than the TPE".....stay in reality and realize the man was 31 at the time of the trade going on 32. You're not going to get a 1st rounder nor a young prospect for a dude on the down swing in his career. There is statistical proof for almost every big that has played this game showing a decline in almost every stat across the board after age 32. There is no refuting this.

The TPE was the most valuable asset coming from that trade. Do people not understand the business side of the sport or what ?


co-sign with what deep said. TPE gives a team greater flexibility as they dont have to pay a contract in return.

I sure would like a 6MOY LO on our current roster though.. :(
User avatar
TruSkool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,706
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
 

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#14 » by TruSkool » Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:05 am

DEEP3CL wrote:People kill me with this "got more than the TPE".....stay in reality and realize the man was 31 at the time of the trade going on 32. You're not going to get a 1st rounder nor a young prospect for a dude on the down swing in his career. There is statistical proof for almost every big that has played this game showing a decline in almost every stat across the board after age 32. There is no refuting this.

The TPE was the most valuable asset coming from that trade. Do people not understand the business side of the sport or what ?


you can't come out saying he's on the "downside of his career" at age 30-31 when he's statistically had his best career as a laker the season before he left and won 6th man of the year award.
Lamar was one of those players that could play at a high level until his 35-36 solely based on his versatility.
Trading him away was an expected blow to this team, and it shows this season.

on the flip side, had LAL not mentioned publicly that he was going to be traded, i'm sure lamar would have a similar statistical season under mike brown. as a matter of fact, he'd probably be in the starting line up because MB did say he wanted to try out the whole 3 big men trio, which phil always hesitated to do.

my 2 cents- LAL was better with lamar, and lamar was better with LAL. he took a pay cut and a backseat for us and we kicked his butt out of here like an aging second rounder. BULLSH*T!
User avatar
crimsonkb24
Senior
Posts: 629
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 31, 2010

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#15 » by crimsonkb24 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:37 pm

odom wouldn't have put up those numbers with Kobe around him.
frozt
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,905
And1: 1,283
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: God's green earth.
       

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#16 » by frozt » Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:33 pm

even if odom was back on the team and put up identical stats to last year, i still feel like the Lakers would be playing the same as they are now, i think the trade was ok/good.
Resident band wagon vigilante.
User avatar
Gek
RealGM
Posts: 38,024
And1: 1,807
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#17 » by Gek » Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:53 pm

iki4life wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:People kill me with this "got more than the TPE".....stay in reality and realize the man was 31 at the time of the trade going on 32. You're not going to get a 1st rounder nor a young prospect for a dude on the down swing in his career. There is statistical proof for almost every big that has played this game showing a decline in almost every stat across the board after age 32. There is no refuting this.

The TPE was the most valuable asset coming from that trade. Do people not understand the business side of the sport or what ?


you can't come out saying he's on the "downside of his career" at age 30-31 when he's statistically had his best career as a laker the season before he left and won 6th man of the year award.
Lamar was one of those players that could play at a high level until his 35-36 solely based on his versatility.
Trading him away was an expected blow to this team, and it shows this season.

on the flip side, had LAL not mentioned publicly that he was going to be traded, i'm sure lamar would have a similar statistical season under mike brown. as a matter of fact, he'd probably be in the starting line up because MB did say he wanted to try out the whole 3 big men trio, which phil always hesitated to do.

my 2 cents- LAL was better with lamar, and lamar was better with LAL. he took a pay cut and a backseat for us and we kicked his butt out of here like an aging second rounder. BULLSH*T!


Except you don't trade a second rounder for 9 million and a first.
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
ALL HAIL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,474
And1: 1,213
Joined: Dec 27, 2005

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#18 » by ALL HAIL » Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:06 pm

It really doesn't matter what Odom is or isn't doing right now in Dallas ... it was still the right move.

I don't care if dude was going 20 and 10 ... it was still the right move.

Odom is a role player.

If THE SYSTEM was still in place, with Phil Jackson, you keep him around, but with ALL OF THE CHANGES swirling around this team, Odom was more of a risk to keep than to trade (even if it was only for a an exception).
So Gutta
Pro Prospect
Posts: 954
And1: 60
Joined: Nov 29, 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Contact:
 

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#19 » by So Gutta » Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:00 am

Apparently Lamar didn't show up for practice today.

viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1164304

The trade keeps looking better and better.
"Put five thousand bucks on the Lakers." --Krusty The Clown
hye-pride
Banned User
Posts: 117
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 04, 2012

Re: LO trade was the right move 

Post#20 » by hye-pride » Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:08 am

Funny how some of you guys change your tone.

You sat here and complained about how bad of a move it was.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers