SelbyCobra wrote:NoLayupRule wrote:Im just curious how you think this statement lacks accountability
Again it’s my fault. We lost the game because I got into foul trouble.
its the very definition of accountability
Because in the context of the game, that had nothing to do with anything, and in fact it was just outright false.
Amar'e had been playing like a dog for multiple games prior, yet he is going to attribute the loss to him getting into foul trouble? That's 100% garbage - it had nothing to do with that game.
In fact, when Amar'e left the game with foul trouble in the 1st half, the Knicks ended up being
ahead by 5 pts at the break. They were even up 2 pts going into the 4th quarter, again, for the mostpart without Amar'e, and then when he came back in and actually played, the team got worse!
It was plain as day that his fouls had nothing to do with the reasons they lost. Then, in typical Amar'e fashion, he responds to a question about not getting the ball in the 4th quarter by playing the passive aggressive blame game.
"I was amped up and ready to go in the fourth. I was ready to dominate."I remembered that quote today because it was infuriating to me at the time - this guy had been shooting 35% from the field on high volume over the past week, and he's essentially going to say the loss was attributable to him being off the floor (completely not true), and him not getting the ball in the 4th quarter (completely unsuportable, as he was in the midst of shooting the ball at a horrific clip).
I've said it before, but the thing that made him awesome to me when he signed, the thing that made him be the one guy, and the perfect guy at that, to bring attention back to the Knicks - his inflated sense of super-stardom - is what's killing me about him since the Knicks have become less reliant on him. His bravado and ignorance to the reality of his value allowed him to be THE panacea in a situation involving a terrible team in a horrible situation. However, I personally find that same attribute (all talk, no substance; inability to speak directly to the truth in the media; lack of legitimate accountability) to play much differently now that the Knicks are in a real, competitive situation with a ton of upward mobility.
Again though, I understand that everyone is different. I just like it when athletes take accountability for REAL, and without indirectly implying that they weren't actually at fault. Like Lin coming out after the Miami game and saying point blank that it's on him, that he has to do a better job, the end.
Excellent post. Couldn't agree more, Selby. Bravado shouldn't be confused with leadership. Leadership always starts with humility. Bravado is only helpful when it's based on an unquestionable record of excellence. Otherwise it's just a transparently inflated sense of one's abilities that will drag down the whole operation (for the logical extreme, think Rex Ryan) because ultimately the goal of the team is simply to keep the leader's ego pumped up.
In today's press conference comments --
http://www.msg.com/videos/lin-chandler- ... 28-1.84440 --- I like that he points to his actual playoff experience as proof that he (and Tyson) need to show others how it's done. There's an air of truth there because in fact he does have more experience, but that experience can only go so far. There's another experience that's fresh on everyon'es mind, and that's the experience of him blatantly stinking up the court for first half of the season. Until he has the humility accept that, his leadership will have a transparent air of posturing.
What do I want Amar'e to say? How about: No excuses. I've played terribly this season, and I'm working my ass off to get better.
Once he admits that, then he is free to become a real leader by displaying the courage to go out and show his teammates in a clear and convincing manner that he's overcoming whatever ailed him. To me, THAT's leadership.
In Amar'e's defense, he's only 29 years old and has never been asked to lead a team until half a season of pre-Melo Knicks. I think the guy has a whole mystic Hebrew leader thing going on, and I don't see him going the way of such egomaniacal failing "superstars" as Vince Carter, TMac, or Marbury who failed as leaders because their intense sense of "superstardom" could never be questioned in their own heads no matter how much they failed.