IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:You know we'd end up paying lopez too much in the offseason and end up letting ryno walk
Not after another foot injury. Hopefully that tempers the market for him a little bit if we do have to make the NJ deal
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:You know we'd end up paying lopez too much in the offseason and end up letting ryno walk

IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:You know we'd probably end up paying lopez too much in the offseason and end up letting ryno walk
PeePee la Fritz wrote:IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:You know we'd end up paying lopez too much in the offseason and end up letting ryno walk
Not after another foot injury. Hopefully that tempers the market for him a little bit if we do have to make the NJ deal

IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:You know we'd probably end up paying lopez too much in the offseason and end up letting ryno walk

IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:PeePee la Fritz wrote:IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:You know we'd end up paying lopez too much in the offseason and end up letting ryno walk
Not after another foot injury. Hopefully that tempers the market for him a little bit if we do have to make the NJ deal
Hopefully. I'm not a fan of lopez. No rebounding or defense


IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:But Centers need to rebound. The nets are one of the worst rebounding teams in the league and thats with humphries whos a top 10 rebounder. We'd be terrible



Nolimit1211 wrote:Cammo101 wrote:The idea that Dwight must be traded because "anything is better than nothing" is fundamentally flawed. We have seen time and again that the worst place to be in the NBA is not last place, but middle of the road. Trading Dwight to try to stay halfway competitive is counterproductive. In the NBA you need to be competing for a title or rebuilding. So, if you can't trade Dwight for a package that can be the basis for a title contender either now or in a rebuild, then you really are better letting Dwight walk.
You're mind frame is correct, but the "anything" we're talking about getting back.. (Lopez/Brooks) / (Monta) aren't players that are gonna keep you "middle of the road".. You WILL be a bad team with these guy, go ahead and look at their current records.. but atleast you'll sell acouple more tickets.
Blue_and_Whte wrote:Didn't realize Lopez suffered another foot injury.... Fantastic. Yeah nobodys going to want him. If they can't get anyone to improve this roster Dwight tells them he's leaving and we're screwed. La won't risk losing Bynum and gasol after his comments and nets can just sign him outright. LMAO!! Wouldn't really surprise me if it turned out like that. Our luck.

shortodom wrote:Blue_and_Whte wrote:Didn't realize Lopez suffered another foot injury.... Fantastic. Yeah nobodys going to want him. If they can't get anyone to improve this roster Dwight tells them he's leaving and we're screwed. La won't risk losing Bynum and gasol after his comments and nets can just sign him outright. LMAO!! Wouldn't really surprise me if it turned out like that. Our luck.
If Brook is out for a while the Lakers offer won't be higher then Bynum,Ebanks and/or maybe Goudlock + picks. Lakers are not competing with anyone else to get him if Nj is out of the running, unless you guys wanna risk losing him for nothing this summer to NJ or Dallas. Who knows though Brooks injury might not be that bad and you guys still have time to improve your roster around him.

hanh wrote:No way. He is a chucker never made the all star team and you wanna trade the best center in the league that never even been hurt for a PG? We need a bigman. I'd take Anderson over Lee too. we don't know Anderson's potential but Lee is not gonna be enough to win games
Davidm89 wrote:Am I really the only one who sees Ellis as a reasonable building block? Dwigh, BBD and Hedo for Ellis/Lee and fillers with a couple picks. Better than Bynums ankle, or Lopez's injury proneness. I see Ellis as a poor mans prime T-mac, if we can pair him with Dwight perfect but if not I'd much rather have him than Bynum or Lopez.