ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread XVIII: 1/20/12 - 5/14/12

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,111
And1: 10,617
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1201 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Mar 9, 2012 11:03 pm

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/03/ ... traded/?po

The tweet did not specify to where, but earlier reports indicated that Houston has been aggressively been trying to acquire Gasol.

Razenby writes, “it seems we’ll be soon getting news that Gasol has been traded. No details confirmed, but he’s apparently gone.“

NBA.com reported earlier that Houston will be willing to send Kyle Lowry and Luis Scola to L.A.

The Lakers front office has not confirmed any deal.


If the Lakers get Lowry, that could make the deal palatable for them, but I think they're probably underestimating how much they'll miss Gasol.

Also, who' to say the rumor is true. I kind of believe somebody leaked it and it the destination will be Houston.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1202 » by Ruzious » Fri Mar 9, 2012 11:12 pm

Just add Young to McGee and Turiaf for Bogut. That works - salary wise. Young's almost certainly not returning here, anyway. If we add Vesely, I'd expect to get Tobias Harris back.

Do I really want to do a Bogut trade? Probably not, but Prada makes a good point (even if it wasn't the point he meant to make) about possibly being stuck with a worse Javale contract. But I definitely would not take on Jackson, his contract, and his whining.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
dandridge 10
Veteran
Posts: 2,500
And1: 537
Joined: Feb 16, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1203 » by dandridge 10 » Fri Mar 9, 2012 11:31 pm

nate33 wrote:Michael Lee says the Bogut deal is hard to pull off because the Wizards don't have the salary filler to make it work. That would imply that the foundation of the deal is McGee + Turiaf for Bogut. The Wizards need to add about $1.2M in outgoing salary to make it comply with the CBA. Roger Mason alone isn't enough and the Bucks would have to cut two players if we added a fourth guy in the package.

The only way it would work would be if it was McGee + Turiaf + one of Singleton, Seraphin, Crawford, Young or Vesely. Young probably wouldn't agree to it and the Wizards probably wouldn't include Vesely.

Would you be willing to add either Crawford or Singleton to a McGee + Turiaf package?


I would add Crawford in a heartbeat. I actually like Crawford when he plays under control, but Crawford can easily be replaced.

Although I would rather get a younger prospect back for McGee who doesn't have an injury history, I would pull the trigger on the Bogut trade. His recent ankle injury doesn't sound that serious and the guy can be a top center if healthy. Although he is not the most athletic guy in the world, he is great rebounder, which we definitely need if we really want to become a running team. He also would be a significant upgrade on the defensive end, as well as improve the overall bbiq dramatically on this team. If he doesn't pan out, its only a 2 year contract. I'd rather take a two year gamble on a guy like Bogut than a 4 year gamble on a knucklehead like McGee. Of course, this all assumes that we are not taking a bad contract in return like Stephen Jackson and there are no other better options on the table for McGee.

O
User avatar
dandridge 10
Veteran
Posts: 2,500
And1: 537
Joined: Feb 16, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1204 » by dandridge 10 » Fri Mar 9, 2012 11:33 pm

Ruzious wrote:Just add Young to McGee and Turiaf for Bogut. That works - salary wise. Young's almost certainly not returning here, anyway. If we add Vesely, I'd expect to get Tobias Harris back.

Do I really want to do a Bogut trade? Probably not, but Prada makes a good point (even if it wasn't the point he meant to make) about possibly being stuck with a worse Javale contract. But I definitely would not take on Jackson, his contract, and his whining.


I doubt Young would agree to go to Milwaukee.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,226
And1: 8,057
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1205 » by Dat2U » Fri Mar 9, 2012 11:39 pm

I'm solidly against any trade that involves sending Javale for Bogut. It just reeks of the many terrible trades we've made over the last 20 years involving young for old or broken down players.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,874
And1: 413
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1206 » by popper » Fri Mar 9, 2012 11:56 pm

Something doesn't feel right about this trade. There must be a third team involved or additional player combinations from Wiz and Bucks.
WizarDynasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 278
Joined: Oct 23, 2003

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1207 » by WizarDynasty » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:14 am

i think its pretty absurb to label to label mcgee a knucklehead. knucklehead = a stupid person.

Its alot more accurate to label McGee a late bloomer being that he didn't grow facial hair until this year. McGee has show much improvement as far as basketball iq. a stupid person wouldn't show improvement.
So if you don't want to appear as a knucklehead poster= maybe you should use words that accurately describe McGee. Again, a stupid person doesn't improve their basketball iq and mcgee has show significant improvement this season.
McGee is the classic example of a man who's body reaches it maturity stage later than most. Same thing for Nick Young.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
llcc25
Senior
Posts: 532
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 13, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1208 » by llcc25 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:14 am

Dat2U wrote:I'm solidly against any trade that involves sending Javale for Bogut. It just reeks of the many terrible trades we've made over the last 20 years involving young for old or broken down players.

Bogut is only 27 years old. If his injury checks out, a trade for Bogut is well worth the risk since he's only signed for 2 more years. I'd like to see Wall and our new lotto pick develop with a legit C who knows how to play the low post from both the offensive and defensive standpoint. I understand your thinking that this reeks of many past trades involving young for old or broken down players, but I don't think the comparison fits in this case. To be fair, you need to qualify the "young" with "weak, boneheaded, can't play defense, can't shoot ft's, can't pnr, will have to pay $10m/year, etc"...vs older, possibly injury risk, legit C, only signed for 2 more years...I Then its clear, what the solid choice is...
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,860
And1: 3,578
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1209 » by Rafael122 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:20 am

Especially if it means getting rid of Blatche. Honestly, there's probably not much of a market for McGee anyway. If the best we could do is to get someone like Ekpe Udoh and maybe Dorrell Wright or Klay Thompson??
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,920
And1: 5,391
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1210 » by tontoz » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:31 am

WizarDynasty wrote:i think its pretty absurb to label to label mcgee a knucklehead. knucklehead = a stupid person.



[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27-jM2NvBIc[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkKJvqMTbrA[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhNrJOZHlRI[/youtube]
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
llcc25
Senior
Posts: 532
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 13, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1211 » by llcc25 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:45 am

tontoz wrote:
WizarDynasty wrote:i think its pretty absurb to label to label mcgee a knucklehead. knucklehead = a stupid person.



[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27-jM2NvBIc[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkKJvqMTbrA[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhNrJOZHlRI[/youtube]


thank you tontoz.
Jay81
Veteran
Posts: 2,626
And1: 580
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1212 » by Jay81 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:59 am

Dat2U wrote:I'm solidly against any trade that involves sending Javale for Bogut. It just reeks of the many terrible trades we've made over the last 20 years involving young for old or broken down players.


sometimes i wonder if people just want to make a trade for the sake of making a trade. We have very few assests and trading McGee who is an asset for crap like Bogus is not what we should be doing. Every trade Ive seen so far proposed has been in favor of the other team. Bogus has a broken elbow and is now very injury prone despite his young age
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,772
And1: 23,286
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1213 » by nate33 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:59 am

Michael Lee via Twitter wrote:Source just told me #wizards have informed teams they can have any player except John Wall if they are willing to take Andray Blatche


I'd be really pi$$ed if they give up Booker just to dump Blatche. That would be shortsighted as hell. We have a ton of cap room this summer anyhow. Why give up actual talent just to create cap room that we're not going to use? I'd rather keep Blatche, lock him in the training room, and don't let him near the team unless he gets in shape. It's better than giving Booker up.

If nothing else, Blatche's trade value is at an all time low. At least wait until his annual April Fools Dray run before dealing him.
Jimmy Recard
RealGM
Posts: 10,417
And1: 5,846
Joined: Feb 08, 2009
 

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1214 » by Jimmy Recard » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:00 am

When Bogut is healthy he is EASILY a top 5 Center. Probably top 3. Again, the disclaimer is 'when he's healthy', and he hasn't been for a while.

Outside of Dwight, no big man in the league has the same impact as a defensive anchor though. Just great overall defensive instincts, great footwork, shot blocking, and he draws charges better than any other big man in the league. Scoring wise, he has sucked since the Amar'e injury, but he was good for 16 and 10 before that.
Jay81
Veteran
Posts: 2,626
And1: 580
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1215 » by Jay81 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:04 am

Jimmy Recard wrote:When Bogut is healthy he is EASILY a top 5 Center. Probably top 3. Again, the disclaimer is 'when he's healthy', and he hasn't been for a while.

Outside of Dwight, no big man in the league has the same impact as a defensive anchor though. Just great overall defensive instincts, great footwork, shot blocking, and he draws charges better than any other big man in the league. Scoring wise, he has sucked since the Amar'e injury, but he was good for 16 and 10 before that.


he reminds me of Gilbert before his injury....teetering on superstardom and then was never the same player again. He wouldnt be on the block if the bucks thought he could return to pre injury ways
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1216 » by truwizfan4evr » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:04 am

tontoz wrote:
WizarDynasty wrote:i think its pretty absurb to label to label mcgee a knucklehead. knucklehead = a stupid person.



[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27-jM2NvBIc[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkKJvqMTbrA[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhNrJOZHlRI[/youtube]

How embarrassing. I like his upside but I think it's worth trading him for Bogut he would not make any knucklehead plays like Javale or even Andray. We need to trade guys like Javale and Andray. And hopefully make this organization respectable again. Don't matter who coaches them They will always have a low IQ. Bogut shown to be a underrated shot blocker and rebounder. If not Bogut hopefully get some nice solid pieces who act professional.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,772
And1: 23,286
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1217 » by nate33 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:05 am

If the deal is just McGee + filler for Bogut then I think it's no-brainer. We've got to do it. I'd much rather have Bogut for 2 years at $13M a year, than McGee for 4 years at $11M a year. With the way Wall, Booker, Singleton and Vesely defend the perimeter, this team would be a top 10 defensive team if they had a center with a brain.

You just have to keep in mind that McGee on a rookie contract is an exciting prospect, but McGee on an onerous, $11M a year contract is a different story. Every one of his numerous mistakes is going to be magnified big time.
Jay81
Veteran
Posts: 2,626
And1: 580
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1218 » by Jay81 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:06 am

nate33 wrote:If the deal is just McGee + filler for Bogut then I think it's no-brainer. We've got to do it. I'd much rather have Bogut for 2 years at $13M a year, than McGee for 4 years at $11M a year. With the way Wall, Booker, Singleton and Vesely defend the perimeter, this team would be a top 10 defensive team if they had a center with a brain.

You just have to keep in mind that McGee on a rookie contract is an exciting prospect, but McGee on an onerous, $11M a year contract is a different story. Every one of his numerous mistakes is going to be magnified big time.


What makes you think someone is going to offer McGee 11million a year. His stock went down this year...he had much higher stock at the end of last season imo
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1219 » by dangermouse » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:12 am

The Aussie in me says hell yes to the Bogut trade. But only if his injury is managable and not career ending. And only if the trade included Dray or Lewis. McGee + Dray + filler should be enough straight up, or McGee + Lewis as a framework, anything else is highway robbery on the part of MIL. He would further change the culture of the team, hes a great lockerroom guy and is a smart ball player as well as being legitimately the 2nd best defensive centre when healthy. But that is the key, can he get healthy enough again to really help us next season?

McGee and Blatche/Lewis leaving the team also further changes the culture. If we use Lew, amnesty Blatche... We'd go from being a leaguewide joke into being a genuine playoff team with room to improve down the line, right when Wall's rookie deal is up.

However, the Wizard fan in me says No. Honestly, I would go out and buy a Bogut Wizards jersey today if it happens, but deep down I know its the wrong move. Theres just too much injury concern, coupled with our notorious medical staff... He is still quite young for a big man, but he would be 29/30 by the time we would be ready, and whos to say he would be healthy then too? Its just too risky.

That and I hate Stephen Jackson. Keep him the hell away from DC.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#1220 » by dangermouse » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:22 am

nate33 wrote:If the deal is just McGee + filler for Bogut then I think it's no-brainer. We've got to do it. I'd much rather have Bogut for 2 years at $13M a year, than McGee for 4 years at $11M a year.


I was just about to post this after looking at Bogut's contract details.

Who is worth the contract? The injured guy who, when healthy, is a game changer? Or the knucklehead athlete with "upside" who is never injured but rarely ever helps you win games?

Not to mention Bogut's deal is up right when Wall's is. We've been discussing trades that make us genuinely good for a while until Wall has to re-sign, which hopefully draws interest from big name FA's who sign here at the same time and we become great. This is probably one of the better forms of those trades/scenarios.

He wouldnt even hurt the tank this year. Going into next year with a core of Bogut/Robsinson/Wall would be a pretty damn good team...
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.

Return to Washington Wizards