Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV, Mods Close)

CourtsideTV · Post #1082 » by **CourtsideTV** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:53 pm

i just got a DM from dwight. he said that he's re-upping in orlando

jernigan · Post #1083 » by **jernigan** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:55 pm

CourtsideTV wrote:i just got a DM from dwight. he said that he's re-upping in orlando

Me too. Thought I was special...let down :sad:

PeePee la Fritz · Post #1084 » by **PeePee la Fritz** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:57 pm

CourtsideTV wrote:i just got a DM from dwight. he said that he's re-upping in orlando

????? Are you serious?! I'm in a very fragile emotional state and cant take much more disappointment

toquito · Post #1085 » by **toquito** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:57 pm

no news today.... who wants some old news? http://www.theonion.com/articles/report ... ter,17518/

JarethCutestory · Post #1086 » by **JarethCutestory** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:06 pm

I got a DM from Brian Cook. He's getting traded to us for Trevor Ariza. Mo Evans may be included.

gp123 · Post #1087 » by **gp123** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:21 pm

Anything else?

gp123 · Post #1088 » by **gp123** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:22 pm

someone hit me with some knowledge!

Deadcellz · Post #1089 » by **Deadcellz** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:23 pm

gp123 wrote:someone hit me with some knowledge!

Dogs can't look up

gp123 · Post #1090 » by **gp123** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:25 pm

Deadcellz wrote:
gp123 wrote:someone hit me with some knowledge!

Dogs can't look up

can you confirm your sources?

Deadcellz · Post #1091 » by **Deadcellz** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:26 pm

gp123 wrote:
Deadcellz wrote:
gp123 wrote:someone hit me with some knowledge!

Dogs can't look up

can you confirm your sources?

Woj

Post #1092 » by **Bensational** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:27 pm

lol, so much hate in the last few pages of this thread. can't we all just post some funny gifs or something?

Deadcellz · Post #1093 » by **Deadcellz** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:30 pm

The overall quietness of the league in terms of trades sucks, if Dwight isn't confirmed until the day of the deadline, how does that fair with the rest of the league making trades last minute?

JarethCutestory · Post #1094 » by **JarethCutestory** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:32 pm

We hold the cards. We're the gatekeeper and the key master and even Zool. We're the GD Ghostbusters too so who ya gonna call league? Who the F ya gonna call? Otis Smith that's who and guess what ladies? He likes this team.

RookieStar · Post #1095 » by **RookieStar** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:37 pm

DAMMIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!! AARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

Seriously, no news?

NW · Post #1096 » by NW » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:41 pm

http://www.ibabuzz.com/warriors/2012/03 ... ment-50812

Warriors Have Their Eyes on Andrew Bogut

By Marcus Thompson
Saturday, March 10th, 2012 at 12:26 pm in Uncategorized.

Talks perhaps won’t really heat up for another couple days. But count the Warriors among teams interested in Andrew Bogut.

According to team sources, the Warriors are preparing to make a play for Milwaukee’s center. He’s high on their list, but one source didn’t sound too optimistic.

First off, Bogut is hurt. Thanks to an injured left ankle, he could be done for the season. Ideally, the Warriors would like to trade for someone who can help now.

Also, Bogut’s price is high.

The Bucks, which are in desperate need of consistent offense, aren’t pining to get Monta Ellis – who would form a little backcourt with point guard Brandon Jennings. But even if the Warriors come up with a package the Bucks might like – for instance Andris Biedrins, Kwame Brown’s expiring, Dorell Wright and Ekpe Udoh — Golden State would have to take back on of two players they really don’t want.

Stephen Jackson or Drew Gooden.

Jackson’s history with the Warriors is probably too irreparable for him to bring back. Plus, the Warriors would not give him the extension he wants, so it could end poorly. However, Jackson – who makes $9 million this year and $10 million next year – would be an upgrade over Dorell Wright and if it means shedding Biedrins’ last year, it may be worth considering.

Gooden is a tad more desireable than Jackson. He can give them something off the bench, especially if the Warriors lose Udoh. Problem with Gooden, a Bay Area native, is his contract has three years, $20 million on it after this year. That’s a noted commitment. But it may be worth it if the Warriors can add Bogut while keeping it’s core.

Perhaps the more likely option is to get a third team involved, preferably one that would take Stephen Jackson.

Let's make something happen

Post #1097 » by **eyriq** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:47 pm

Are we seriously trying to get these epic threads locked? Stop with the spam posts, pretty please

IGotDaMagicInMe · Post #1098 » by **IGotDaMagicInMe** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:48 pm

NW wrote:http://www.ibabuzz.com/warriors/2012/03/10/warriors-have-their-eyes-on-andrew-bogut/comment-page-1/#comment-50812

Warriors Have Their Eyes on Andrew Bogut

By Marcus Thompson
Saturday, March 10th, 2012 at 12:26 pm in Uncategorized.

Talks perhaps won’t really heat up for another couple days. But count the Warriors among teams interested in Andrew Bogut.

According to team sources, the Warriors are preparing to make a play for Milwaukee’s center. He’s high on their list, but one source didn’t sound too optimistic.

First off, Bogut is hurt. Thanks to an injured left ankle, he could be done for the season. Ideally, the Warriors would like to trade for someone who can help now.

Also, Bogut’s price is high.

The Bucks, which are in desperate need of consistent offense, aren’t pining to get Monta Ellis – who would form a little backcourt with point guard Brandon Jennings. But even if the Warriors come up with a package the Bucks might like – for instance Andris Biedrins, Kwame Brown’s expiring, Dorell Wright and Ekpe Udoh — Golden State would have to take back on of two players they really don’t want.

Stephen Jackson or Drew Gooden.

Jackson’s history with the Warriors is probably too irreparable for him to bring back. Plus, the Warriors would not give him the extension he wants, so it could end poorly. However, Jackson – who makes $9 million this year and $10 million next year – would be an upgrade over Dorell Wright and if it means shedding Biedrins’ last year, it may be worth considering.

Gooden is a tad more desireable than Jackson. He can give them something off the bench, especially if the Warriors lose Udoh. Problem with Gooden, a Bay Area native, is his contract has three years, $20 million on it after this year. That’s a noted commitment. But it may be worth it if the Warriors can add Bogut while keeping it’s core.

Perhaps the more likely option is to get a third team involved, preferably one that would take Stephen Jackson.

Let's make something happen

But what team would want Stephen Jackson? :dontknow:

WeAreVenom · Post #1099 » by **WeAreVenom** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:56 pm

NW wrote:http://www.ibabuzz.com/warriors/2012/03/10/warriors-have-their-eyes-on-andrew-bogut/comment-page-1/#comment-50812

Warriors Have Their Eyes on Andrew Bogut

By Marcus Thompson
Saturday, March 10th, 2012 at 12:26 pm in Uncategorized.

Talks perhaps won’t really heat up for another couple days. But count the Warriors among teams interested in Andrew Bogut.

According to team sources, the Warriors are preparing to make a play for Milwaukee’s center. He’s high on their list, but one source didn’t sound too optimistic.

First off, Bogut is hurt. Thanks to an injured left ankle, he could be done for the season. Ideally, the Warriors would like to trade for someone who can help now.

Also, Bogut’s price is high.

The Bucks, which are in desperate need of consistent offense, aren’t pining to get Monta Ellis – who would form a little backcourt with point guard Brandon Jennings. But even if the Warriors come up with a package the Bucks might like – for instance Andris Biedrins, Kwame Brown’s expiring, Dorell Wright and Ekpe Udoh — Golden State would have to take back on of two players they really don’t want.

Stephen Jackson or Drew Gooden.

Jackson’s history with the Warriors is probably too irreparable for him to bring back. Plus, the Warriors would not give him the extension he wants, so it could end poorly. However, Jackson – who makes $9 million this year and $10 million next year – would be an upgrade over Dorell Wright and if it means shedding Biedrins’ last year, it may be worth considering.

Gooden is a tad more desireable than Jackson. He can give them something off the bench, especially if the Warriors lose Udoh. Problem with Gooden, a Bay Area native, is his contract has three years, $20 million on it after this year. That’s a noted commitment. But it may be worth it if the Warriors can add Bogut while keeping it’s core.

Perhaps the more likely option is to get a third team involved, preferably one that would take Stephen Jackson.

Let's make something happen

I doubt it, Lacob seems convinced he can get Dwight.....so I doubt he makes a trade that would help keep him here.

glennathan · Post #1100 » by **glennathan** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:02 pm

IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:
NW wrote:http://www.ibabuzz.com/warriors/2012/03/10/warriors-have-their-eyes-on-andrew-bogut/comment-page-1/#comment-50812

Warriors Have Their Eyes on Andrew Bogut

By Marcus Thompson
Saturday, March 10th, 2012 at 12:26 pm in Uncategorized.

Talks perhaps won’t really heat up for another couple days. But count the Warriors among teams interested in Andrew Bogut.

According to team sources, the Warriors are preparing to make a play for Milwaukee’s center. He’s high on their list, but one source didn’t sound too optimistic.

First off, Bogut is hurt. Thanks to an injured left ankle, he could be done for the season. Ideally, the Warriors would like to trade for someone who can help now.

Also, Bogut’s price is high.

The Bucks, which are in desperate need of consistent offense, aren’t pining to get Monta Ellis – who would form a little backcourt with point guard Brandon Jennings. But even if the Warriors come up with a package the Bucks might like – for instance Andris Biedrins, Kwame Brown’s expiring, Dorell Wright and Ekpe Udoh — Golden State would have to take back on of two players they really don’t want.

Stephen Jackson or Drew Gooden.

Jackson’s history with the Warriors is probably too irreparable for him to bring back. Plus, the Warriors would not give him the extension he wants, so it could end poorly. However, Jackson – who makes $9 million this year and $10 million next year – would be an upgrade over Dorell Wright and if it means shedding Biedrins’ last year, it may be worth considering.

Gooden is a tad more desireable than Jackson. He can give them something off the bench, especially if the Warriors lose Udoh. Problem with Gooden, a Bay Area native, is his contract has three years, $20 million on it after this year. That’s a noted commitment. But it may be worth it if the Warriors can add Bogut while keeping it’s core.

Perhaps the more likely option is to get a third team involved, preferably one that would take Stephen Jackson.

Let's make something happen

But what team would want Stephen Jackson?

Too bad Orlando does not need Jackson and it is a shame he was not on Dwight's list of wanted players