ImageImageImageImage

Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII, Mods Close)

Moderators: Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF

User avatar
Tarnag
Sophomore
Posts: 174
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 28, 2011

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#381 » by Tarnag » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:46 pm

Nolimit1211 wrote:Wake up homers, Ryan Anderson is gone in any trade involving Ellis..

Hey I'll take it, a week ago you were saying we had zero chance to land Ellis
Image
User avatar
Nolimit1211
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,174
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 24, 2008
Location: Flawda!

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#382 » by Nolimit1211 » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:47 pm

Tarnag wrote:
Nolimit1211 wrote:Wake up homers, Ryan Anderson is gone in any trade involving Ellis..

Hey I'll take it, a week ago you were saying we had zero chance to land Ellis

And according to Alex Kennedy, we still don't lol
Vince Carter vs. Brandon Roy: A healthy guy who likes to pretend he's injured against an injured guy pretending to be healthy. - John Hollinger
gp123
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,260
And1: 75
Joined: Nov 01, 2011

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#383 » by gp123 » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:48 pm

RickB-Orlando wrote:
Swiftraven wrote:Kyler is correct, they need Dwight to opt in for next year at least or none of this happens.

Yep. If he won't publicly commit to opting in, I'm guessing we go to plan "B", which is trading him for the best deal possible.


I don't follow the logic... you have a chance at landing monta ellis, and likely will take on sjax in the process, but many scenarios also have hedo going out. we end up with biedrins but whatever... backup center.

So basically if dwight walks your left with 1 year of sjax who comes off the books at like 10mil, nelson is up so thats 8 mil, and dwight walks thats 18 mil off the books... but more likely you can s/t in the summer and still get value.

Your left with monta ellis, and capspace. there are worst places to be...
Edrock
Rookie
Posts: 1,240
And1: 221
Joined: Oct 10, 2007
   

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#384 » by Edrock » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:50 pm

Ken Berger wrote:The Warriors are discussing ways to acquire center Andrew Bogut from Milwaukee as part of a complicated, three-team proposal that would send Monta Ellis to Orlando, multiple league sources told CBSSports.com.


Alex Kennedy ‏ @AlexKennedyNBA
Source close to the situation denied the rumored talks between the Warriors, Magic and Bucks: "No discussion whatsoever. Not one call."


So who's sources are to be believed... Kennedy's or Berger's? Berger had multiple sources, and Kennedy cites (and I use that term loosely) just one FWIW
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,058
And1: 12,513
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#385 » by BadMofoPimp » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:50 pm

Rick Rolled wrote:
Alex Kennedy ‏ @AlexKennedyNBA
Source close to the situation denied the rumored talks between the Warriors, Magic and Bucks: "No discussion whatsoever. Not one call."


I think this has been a huge possibility. Rumors can spread quick with the help of media whores trying to gain followers.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
MagicFan41
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,944
And1: 167
Joined: Jul 09, 2010

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#386 » by MagicFan41 » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:51 pm

I'm not convinced SJax, in the right situation (playing for a contender, with a coach who lets him play <- might be a prob with Stubborn Van Gundy), wouldn't be valuable. He is a pretty good defender, and UP UNTIL THIS YEAR in Milwaukee, he had been for like 6 years a 20-5-4 type guy. I don't think you just drop off all of a sudden for no real reason. He isn't injured, and his game was never really built on a lot of athleticism, so I think it's more a mental checkout than anything due to his situation.
User avatar
Reggie Theus
Junior
Posts: 364
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 02, 2012

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#387 » by Reggie Theus » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:52 pm

Nyce_1 wrote:Stick to YBR and/or Rudolph.


These guys are so full of **** as well
User avatar
OrlandO
RealGM
Posts: 21,634
And1: 16,421
Joined: May 27, 2009

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#388 » by OrlandO » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:54 pm

If nothing happens, I blame Rudolph...
User avatar
bigpimpatl
Analyst
Posts: 3,190
And1: 1,661
Joined: Mar 16, 2010

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#389 » by bigpimpatl » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:56 pm

MagicFan41 wrote:I'm not convinced SJax, in the right situation (playing for a contender, with a coach who lets him play <- might be a prob with Stubborn Van Gundy), wouldn't be valuable. He is a pretty good defender, and UP UNTIL THIS YEAR in Milwaukee, he had been for like 6 years a 20-5-4 type guy. I don't think you just drop off all of a sudden for no real reason. He isn't injured, and his game was never really built on a lot of athleticism, so I think it's more a mental checkout than anything due to his situation.


dude. stephen jax is terrible. We aren't getting the '09 or even '10 SJax. It's 2012; he plays like crap. Can't even get PT on a team like the bucks, still fighting for a playoff spot. Obviously you put anyone next to Dwight and they look better. But he'd still suck.

And why ignore this year? Do you think he'll magically turn everything around and be that player you think he is? No, it's not going to happen. And yes, you do drop off for no reason. See: Jameer Nelson, Hedo, and Rashard.
User avatar
KingRobb02
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,464
And1: 917
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
         

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#390 » by KingRobb02 » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:56 pm

MagicFan41 wrote:I'm not convinced SJax, in the right situation (playing for a contender, with a coach who lets him play <- might be a prob with Stubborn Van Gundy), wouldn't be valuable. He is a pretty good defender, and UP UNTIL THIS YEAR in Milwaukee, he had been for like 6 years a 20-5-4 type guy. I don't think you just drop off all of a sudden for no real reason. He isn't injured, and his game was never really built on a lot of athleticism, so I think it's more a mental checkout than anything due to his situation.

Yeah, but next year we are stuck with the guy pouting as a Dwight-less Magic team is worse than his current situation. Do we really have to sign up for that?
User avatar
BelgianMagic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,888
And1: 130
Joined: Feb 02, 2010
       

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#391 » by BelgianMagic » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:57 pm

bigpimpatl wrote:dude. stephen jax is terrible. We aren't getting the '09 or even '10 SJax. It's 2012; he plays like crap. Can't even get PT on a team like the bucks, still fighting for a playoff spot. Obviously you put anyone next to Dwight and they look better. But he'd still suck.

And why ignore this year? Do you think he'll magically turn everything around and be that player you think he is? No, it's not going to happen. And yes, you do drop off for no reason. See: Jameer Nelson, Hedo, and Rashard.

Him not playing for the Bucks isn't about him being terrible, it's about him not wanting to be there ..
Edrock
Rookie
Posts: 1,240
And1: 221
Joined: Oct 10, 2007
   

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#392 » by Edrock » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:00 pm

KingRobb02 wrote:Yeah, but next year we are stuck with the guy pouting as a Dwight-less Magic team is worse than his current situation. Do we really have to sign up for that?


If Dwight's gone, might as well tank and go into full rebuild... Then leverage Jackson's expiring contract for something, so yeah, I'd sign up for that...
User avatar
bigpimpatl
Analyst
Posts: 3,190
And1: 1,661
Joined: Mar 16, 2010

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#393 » by bigpimpatl » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:00 pm

BelgianMagic wrote:
bigpimpatl wrote:dude. stephen jax is terrible. We aren't getting the '09 or even '10 SJax. It's 2012; he plays like crap. Can't even get PT on a team like the bucks, still fighting for a playoff spot. Obviously you put anyone next to Dwight and they look better. But he'd still suck.

And why ignore this year? Do you think he'll magically turn everything around and be that player you think he is? No, it's not going to happen. And yes, you do drop off for no reason. See: Jameer Nelson, Hedo, and Rashard.

Him not playing for the Bucks isn't about him being terrible, it's about him not wanting to be there ..


Yes it is. And, if he doesn't want to be there, just think how poorly it reflects on him professionally. What happens when he gets into a disagreement with SVG? Like the guy said above me, I don't wanna hear that crap when we've lost dwight.
User avatar
Reverse_Angle
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,849
And1: 262
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: Keep those balls in the air!

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#394 » by Reverse_Angle » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:01 pm

BelgianMagic wrote:
bigpimpatl wrote:dude. stephen jax is terrible. We aren't getting the '09 or even '10 SJax. It's 2012; he plays like crap. Can't even get PT on a team like the bucks, still fighting for a playoff spot. Obviously you put anyone next to Dwight and they look better. But he'd still suck.

And why ignore this year? Do you think he'll magically turn everything around and be that player you think he is? No, it's not going to happen. And yes, you do drop off for no reason. See: Jameer Nelson, Hedo, and Rashard.

Him not playing for the Bucks isn't about him being terrible, it's about him not wanting to be there ..


i am not sure how this is a good thing.

also only explains this season, not the 2 seasons before this one.
Image

"Aaron Gordon will cost Henny's job by Dec 2016." Predicted Dec 2014.

"O'Quinn will have a longer and more successful NBA career than Nicholson." Predicted Jun 2012. Verified on Dec 2014.
Nyce_1
RealGM
Posts: 12,968
And1: 6,114
Joined: Jun 29, 2009
Location: Tampa
 

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#395 » by Nyce_1 » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:01 pm

Reggie Theus wrote:
Nyce_1 wrote:Stick to YBR and/or Rudolph.


These guys are so full of **** as well

What makes you say that? Both called the trades being discussed before anyone picked up on it.
MagicFan41
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,944
And1: 167
Joined: Jul 09, 2010

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#396 » by MagicFan41 » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:02 pm

bigpimpatl wrote:
MagicFan41 wrote:I'm not convinced SJax, in the right situation (playing for a contender, with a coach who lets him play <- might be a prob with Stubborn Van Gundy), wouldn't be valuable. He is a pretty good defender, and UP UNTIL THIS YEAR in Milwaukee, he had been for like 6 years a 20-5-4 type guy. I don't think you just drop off all of a sudden for no real reason. He isn't injured, and his game was never really built on a lot of athleticism, so I think it's more a mental checkout than anything due to his situation.


dude. stephen jax is terrible. We aren't getting the '09 or even '10 SJax. It's 2012; he plays like crap. Can't even get PT on a team like the bucks, still fighting for a playoff spot. Obviously you put anyone next to Dwight and they look better. But he'd still suck.

And why ignore this year? Do you think he'll magically turn everything around and be that player you think he is? No, it's not going to happen. And yes, you do drop off for no reason. See: Jameer Nelson, Hedo, and Rashard.


LOL. Hedo and Rashard had injury issues, Rashard has bum knees. Are you joking about Jameer? He "dropped off" because his best friend threw him under the bus, even he said so. His play of late has been quite stellar actually. All those weren't for "no reason". I also said, a loose cannon like SJax can easily check out mentally. It's not that he is "fighting for playing time" on the Bucks, he and Skiles hate each other and he refuses to play him basically.

Hell, look at Lamar Odom. You think his skill level just disappeared? No....he is mentally screwed up at the moment. Has nothing to do with his basketball ability. It's a weird year, there was no offseason, moves got made, etc etc. Look at JRich shooting almost 50% from FT. You think he is just going to all of a sudden become a 50% FT shooter for the rest of his career after always shooting around 75%? No. These are anomalies.

Go look at SJax's games this year where he logged over 30 min (normal playing time). He had QUITE a few good games. Also brings perimeter defense which we severely lack.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,058
And1: 12,513
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#397 » by BadMofoPimp » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:03 pm

SJax last couple of years. He sure does have a low Shooting percentage with 42% at best. 3 pointers are just attrocious. He sure doesn't seem like a Stan type player, but his assists are nice and he can board a little. But, I seriously doubt he would put up better numbers than Hedo. But, would play better Defense.

SEASn FG % 3P% REB AST PTS
'09-'10 0.42 0.28 3.9 4.7 16.6
'09-'10 0.42 0.33 5.1 3.6 21.1
'10-'11 0.41 0.34 4.5 3.6 18.5
'11-'12 0.36 0.28 3.1 3.0 10.5
Career 0.42 0.34 4.0 3.2 16.1

I still think Hedo does better in this system and would consider this trade if Dwight Opts In, but SJax has one year less than Hedo, so that is a bonus to consider. I just don't trust Meer with the Ball in his hands all the time.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
BelgianMagic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,888
And1: 130
Joined: Feb 02, 2010
       

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#398 » by BelgianMagic » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:04 pm

bigpimpatl wrote:
BelgianMagic wrote:Him not playing for the Bucks isn't about him being terrible, it's about him not wanting to be there ..


Yes it is. And, if he doesn't want to be there, just think how poorly it reflects on him professionally. What happens when he gets into a disagreement with SVG?

He didn't wanna go to Milwaukee in the first place ..

He seems to really wanna play with Dwight & on a contending team again. He can still score & defend, of course he won't be as good as he was a couple of years ago, but also not as bad as some think ..
User avatar
Def Swami
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 25,974
And1: 15,371
Joined: Aug 04, 2008
Location: Huevos Bancheros Brunch
Contact:
   

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#399 » by Def Swami » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:06 pm

bigpimpatl wrote:
BelgianMagic wrote:
bigpimpatl wrote:dude. stephen jax is terrible. We aren't getting the '09 or even '10 SJax. It's 2012; he plays like crap. Can't even get PT on a team like the bucks, still fighting for a playoff spot. Obviously you put anyone next to Dwight and they look better. But he'd still suck.

And why ignore this year? Do you think he'll magically turn everything around and be that player you think he is? No, it's not going to happen. And yes, you do drop off for no reason. See: Jameer Nelson, Hedo, and Rashard.

Him not playing for the Bucks isn't about him being terrible, it's about him not wanting to be there ..


Yes it is. And, if he doesn't want to be there, just think how poorly it reflects on him professionally. What happens when he gets into a disagreement with SVG? Like the guy said above me, I don't wanna hear that crap when we've lost dwight.

Players and coaches disagree and are confrontational all of the time. SVG is fine with players that play hard, and you can count on SJax to do that. Not Hedo....
User avatar
bigpimpatl
Analyst
Posts: 3,190
And1: 1,661
Joined: Mar 16, 2010

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XVII: Trade Deadline con 

Post#400 » by bigpimpatl » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:07 pm

Hedo has never had a major injury. Rashard was also quite healthy. Even now when he is fine, he is nowhere close to the same player he was. Nelson (apart from a few games) has looked pretty bad. Look at the whole body of work, not just a few games.

There are no anomalies here; Stephen Jackson is old, doesn't have much left in the tank, is owed $10 mil next season (when he'll be 35). And, he SUCKS. Why you guys are infatuated with him (regardless of what Dwight says) is beyond me.

Return to Orlando Magic