No Absolutely not. All you posted are fabricated measurement of statistics. That are not even peer reviewed or scientifically verified. Its like PER.
There's nothing "fabricated" in those stats. There's no formula, it's +/- numbers. Nothing like PER or Win Shares at all. For what it's worth, defensive RAPM ranks Boozer as the 409th best defensive player in the league.
Its nonsense. If I guard a player 10 times and in those ten times he goes 2 of 10. Then he's 20% against me.
If someone guards him and he goes 7 of 10. Then he's 70% against them.
Wouldn't that show I'm the better defender at guarding him than they?
No. Imagine you're being defended by point guard A, who is a notoriously weak defender who struggles to stay in front of his man. You get by point guard A, and look to attack the basket, however, small forward B quickly comes in to help, blocking your way from the basket, forcing you to pull up for a jumper, and you brick it. Point guard A is credited with forcing you to miss a field goal, however, point guard A played no part in you missing that field goal.
Every thing we need is already covered. Field Goal attempt and Field Goal Made, Plus turnover, etc...
Yes, although, with ZERO context.
And Dwight Howard is 46 because he covers so much ground, He's really switches alot, guards and contests every shot at the basket.
Yes, and Lebron James is 195 because HE ALSO covers so much ground, switches like heck, and guards and alters almost every shot he can get to. I'm pretty sure I covered this in my earlier post. I'm guessing you just glanced at the stats and didn't actually read it.


















