nate33 wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Here is the good news: Fish notes that Nene is better suited to play PF.
I think Seraphin is a good defender at C and I do believe he should start. The reason McGee looked really bad in +/- is that Seraphin really defended well and he also scores with true post moves. He displays strengths as a C where Javale will remain weak IMO. Seraphin can IMO play PF. Nene is a PF IMO who has played C. They seem like a good pair. This can work out better if Seraphin plays with Nene. They will no doubt be a tough starting lineup. Booker is ideally a good sixth man. He's a better player at this point than Kevin, but Seraphin is too strong to keep on the bench.
I will like the look of the lineup if the Wizards decide to go a bit bigger and play more physical ball.
Finally, I can agree with you on this subject. I consistently opposed you on the notion that McGee and Seraphin could coexist on the court together. It wasn't that I didn't want two big strong guys on the court, it's that the two big guys in question were both extremely unskilled.
Nene isn't unskilled. Nene and Seraphin could coexist and I would support seeing that lineup when conditions warrant. By the same token, I think we can get a little more use out of Vesely with Nene on the roster. Nene can play the PF role on offense and the C role on defense, allowing Vesely to play the C role on offense and the PF role on defense.
If you are starting Nene and Vesely, where are the rebounds coming from?






























