ImageImageImageImageImage

Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

The Skyhook
RealGM
Posts: 11,432
And1: 925
Joined: Sep 16, 2008
 

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#681 » by The Skyhook » Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:49 pm

I have a feeling that the Lakers would have acquired both Sessions and Beasely if they had more time. Either way whats done is done. I'm shocked that Mitch was able to trade away some our bad contracts.
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#682 » by DEEP3CL » Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:27 am

The Skyhook wrote:I have a feeling that the Lakers would have acquired both Sessions and Beasely if they had more time. Either way whats done is done. I'm shocked that Mitch was able to trade away some our bad contracts.
Not shocked at all, those deals are short running and gives those teams time to formulate exactly how they go about making it an advantage for them. Secondly we could've made the Sessions deal weeks ago.......we gave up exactly what I knew we would and what the Cavs wanted. Proves everybody was watching that b*tch Dwight drama.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
bruddahmanmatt
Banned User
Posts: 4,879
And1: 4
Joined: Aug 11, 2010

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#683 » by bruddahmanmatt » Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:49 am

http://espn.go.com/blog/los-angeles/lakers/post/_/id/28332/lakers-trade-deadline-how-it-went-down

According to a source familiar with the negotiations, Minnesota backed out of a three-team deal also involving L.A. and Portland at 11:53 a.m. PT, just seven minutes before the noon PT deadline. The trade that was in place would have sent Fisher to Minnesota and the Lakers’ first-round pick acquired in the Lamar Odom trade with Dallas back in December to Portland. Portland, already engaged in a full-fledged fire sale, would have sent Jamal Crawford to Minnesota and the Timberwolves would have sent Anthony Tolliver to Portland. Minnesota would have also been receiving cash considerations from both L.A. and Portland as well.

But, Minnesota owner Glen Taylor and general manager David Kahn pulled out of the deal at the last minute (well, eighth-to-last minute), leaving L.A. officials “puzzled and disappointed” according to a source. Who knows what changed Minnesota’s mind. Maybe it didn’t feel comfortable being on the hook for $3.4 million for a 38-year-old Fisher in 2012-13. Maybe it was concerned that Crawford would opt out of his relatively bargain price of $5 million for next season. L.A. didn’t have time to wallow in the uncertainty trying to figure out the answer. Instead, it scrambled to put together a secondary deal with the Rockets before the trade deadline passed.


FWIW, Beasley would have been a luxury IMO. As much as I would have liked to have his shooting and ability to put the ball on the floor, not getting him does free up some attempts for Goudelock who I still think deserves a few more shots per game.
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,713
And1: 31,980
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#684 » by Dr Aki » Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:22 am

damn, we coulda had beasley instead of hill

KAHHHHHHHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Image
User avatar
Jajwanda
General Manager
Posts: 8,611
And1: 105
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#685 » by Jajwanda » Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:39 am

Based on how things usually go for the Lakers, Jordan Hill will become a valuable third big-man. Michael Beasley will sign in the summer for 2.5m a year (he received a DNP, that's who valuable he is to Minnesota) for two years and the Lakers will laugh... Again.

This franchise has a history of hitting on big deals... missing a few, but hitting even bigger to make up for it.
criteriado
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,807
And1: 1,257
Joined: Sep 20, 2010
     

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#686 » by criteriado » Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:40 pm

Jajwanda wrote:Based on how things usually go for the Lakers, Jordan Hill will become a valuable third big-man. Michael Beasley will sign in the summer for 2.5m a year (he received a DNP, that's who valuable he is to Minnesota) for two years and the Lakers will laugh... Again.

This franchise has a history of hitting on big deals... missing a few, but hitting even bigger to make up for it.


Beas is injured.

edit
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#687 » by LApwnd » Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:51 pm

bruddahmanmatt wrote:
FWIW, Beasley would have been a luxury IMO. As much as I would have liked to have his shooting and ability to put the ball on the floor, not getting him does free up some attempts for Goudelock who I still think deserves a few more shots per game.


yea but if he could've been had for the same package that we gave up for Hill, I would've rather had Beasly....Hill is nothing special and say he is insurance for Bynum, if Bynum goes down we are SOL regardless of who the backup would be, except maybe in Beasly case he could start next to Pau and at least provide an offensive punch unlike Hill who doesn't provide much of anything.
D Nice
Veteran
Posts: 2,840
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 05, 2009

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#688 » by D Nice » Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:39 pm

Aki wrote:damn, we coulda had beasley instead of hill

KAHHHHHHHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
+1 :x
User avatar
crazy8ights
Analyst
Posts: 3,298
And1: 75
Joined: Feb 18, 2010
Location: Toronto Canada
     

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#689 » by crazy8ights » Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:40 pm

Rockets Waive Terrence Williams something we interested in? sound like he's crap tho
User avatar
hazy_01
Rookie
Posts: 1,172
And1: 362
Joined: Jun 06, 2011
Location: Vancouver/Hong Kong
     

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#690 » by hazy_01 » Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:48 pm

I like T-will, as much as he's been playing bad lately these past seasons I still see him better than Eyenga. Turiaf might also get waived but not sure if he's a fit now since we acquired Jordan Hill.
Image
User avatar
jigga_man
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,151
And1: 2,382
Joined: Jul 02, 2004
Location: ...breakfast table in an otherwise empty room
 

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#691 » by jigga_man » Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:03 am

I bet Stern called Taylor to cancel the trade.
laduane1
Banned User
Posts: 2,216
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 04, 2008

Re: Lakers fail to reach deal for Beasley 

Post#692 » by laduane1 » Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:09 am

They did not want the Lakers leftovers.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers