ImageImageImageImageImage

Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ?

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

isekii
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 207
Joined: Jul 14, 2005
       

Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#1 » by isekii » Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:47 pm

Seems like an absolute bargain if it's true.
Trout was offered more than him ? ~ Simply amazing.
Bynum = Future Olowokandi
Prepare to be disappointed Laker Fans.
User avatar
rj2496
Starter
Posts: 2,042
And1: 111
Joined: Dec 06, 2010
Location: New Jersey
       

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#2 » by rj2496 » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:17 pm

Great deal for Denver. Looking at the Stuckey contract compared to this....wow. I think he could have gotten 9-10 million in the open market.
JKNICKS67
Senior
Posts: 525
And1: 39
Joined: Jan 03, 2011

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#3 » by JKNICKS67 » Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:54 am

Incredible for the nuggs really think you guys should have made a move for him
theres a new tank commander in town
AVERYbigmistake
Banned User
Posts: 229
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 12, 2012

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#4 » by AVERYbigmistake » Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:30 pm

Eh... Dude's overrated.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,066
And1: 7,435
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#5 » by nykballa2k4 » Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:04 pm

can't be legit. Chandler should be making at least 8 mil per...
think Gerald Wallace money.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#6 » by vincecarter4pres » Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:30 pm

Good deal for Denver, although I thought you can only lock up one just off rookie scale guy to a 5 year deal on your roster at once?

Chandler's a nice player.

This exhibits how bad the Wallace trade really was though.

There's a good chance he would have opted out this summer anyway and we could have got him for the same contract we wind up resigning him to if he even stays.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#7 » by NyCeEvO » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:37 pm

AVERYbigmistake wrote:Eh... Dude's overrated.

These are the days when Outlaw gets $35 mil, gets amnestied, and someone gives him a second shot because they think he possibly can't be that bad, and now he's averaging 3.3 ppg on 30.9 FG%/18.7 3FG% and has more personal fouls and turnovers than blocks, assists, and steals combined.

Chandler got a good deal. We were all assuming he'd get more than that.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#8 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:32 am

Deal is essentially 4 years for $35 million.

Still not bad.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
AVERYbigmistake
Banned User
Posts: 229
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 12, 2012

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#9 » by AVERYbigmistake » Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:37 am

NyCeEvO wrote:
AVERYbigmistake wrote:Eh... Dude's overrated.

These are the days when Outlaw gets $35 mil, gets amnestied, and someone gives him a second shot because they think he possibly can't be that bad, and now he's averaging 3.3 ppg on 30.9 FG%/18.7 3FG% and has more personal fouls and turnovers than blocks, assists, and steals combined.

Chandler got a good deal. We were all assuming he'd get more than that.


Which doesn't change the fact that Chandler is overrated. Chandler's more productive as a power forward than he is as a small forward he needs an up-tempo system to have success.
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#10 » by NyCeEvO » Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:39 am

AVERYbigmistake wrote:
NyCeEvO wrote:
AVERYbigmistake wrote:Eh... Dude's overrated.

These are the days when Outlaw gets $35 mil, gets amnestied, and someone gives him a second shot because they think he possibly can't be that bad, and now he's averaging 3.3 ppg on 30.9 FG%/18.7 3FG% and has more personal fouls and turnovers than blocks, assists, and steals combined.

Chandler got a good deal. We were all assuming he'd get more than that.


Which doesn't change the fact that Chandler is overrated. Chandler's more productive as a power forward than he is as a small forward he needs an up-tempo system to have success.

How is he overrated lol?

Dude has been gone and no one has been talking about him.

He was overrated right before he was traded to the Nuggets. He got exposed mightily during the end of the season and the playoffs.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#11 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:09 am

Ironically he's similar to Crash.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
AVERYbigmistake
Banned User
Posts: 229
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 12, 2012

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#12 » by AVERYbigmistake » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:45 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:Ironically he's similar to Crash.


Closer to Shawne Williams than he is Gerald Wallace which is one of the reasons why I'm not a fan of his...
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#13 » by vincecarter4pres » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:46 am

AVERYbigmistake wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Ironically he's similar to Crash.


Closer to Shawne Williams than he is Gerald Wallace which is one of the reasons why I'm not a fan of his...

I'd say somewhere in between a lot closer to Wallace.

Wallace is definitely better though.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
AVERYbigmistake
Banned User
Posts: 229
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 12, 2012

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#14 » by AVERYbigmistake » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:52 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:
AVERYbigmistake wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Ironically he's similar to Crash.


Closer to Shawne Williams than he is Gerald Wallace which is one of the reasons why I'm not a fan of his...

I'd say somewhere in between a lot closer to Wallace.

Wallace is definitely better though.


Wallace in his prime could effectively play either small forward or power forward, Chandler just has too much tweenerism in him, he can't draw fouls to save his life and is pretty awful off the dribble. Not that Gerald Wallace has ever been creative off the bounce either, but at least with him you get strong assaults to the rim...

Chandler would much prefer to shoot the three or take a long two-pointer than drive into the teeth of the defense.
AVERYbigmistake
Banned User
Posts: 229
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 12, 2012

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#15 » by AVERYbigmistake » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:53 am

And for what it's worth I don't hate the deal for Denver I just have a feeling they're going to go the way of the Rockets at this rate.

They're going to have a number of very nice players but lack the star power to challenge the great teams in the NBA.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Wilson Chandler 5 / 30 ? 

Post#16 » by vincecarter4pres » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:03 am

AVERYbigmistake wrote:And for what it's worth I don't hate the deal for Denver I just have a feeling they're going to go the way of the Rockets at this rate.

They're going to have a number of very nice players but lack the star power to challenge the great teams in the NBA.

If Gallo doesn't finally bust out or they don't make a consolidation trade I completely agree.

I wouldn't even call it the Rockets route, I would say the Denver route, it's what they've been since they traded Melo.

They're like a super Sixers if anything.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.

Return to Brooklyn Nets