Game 44: Golden State Warriors (18-23) @ Utah Jazz (21-22)

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

SLC Biz
Junior
Posts: 390
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: Game 44: Golden State Warriors (18-23) @ Utah Jazz (21-2 

Post#61 » by SLC Biz » Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:27 am

russnumber3 wrote:
SLC Biz wrote:
Jazz: 94.5
Warriors: 103


Oh were those overtime games? Yeah I thought not. Just as Coldblue has said...like it or not, Al is our best bet on offense. There are definetely things that he can improve on, but the team could also improve on some things to help him out...like being able to hit open jumpers.


Well if you only care about offense, then sure. But I think that being 7.5 points worse on offense is worth the 16 point improvement on defense. And that's been the thing about the non-Al Jefferson lineups all season: Small drop-off on offense more than offset by significant improvement on defense.
SLC Biz
Junior
Posts: 390
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: Game 44: Golden State Warriors (18-23) @ Utah Jazz (21-2 

Post#62 » by SLC Biz » Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:01 am

ColdBlue wrote:
russnumber3 wrote:
The59Sound wrote:It always functions better without Jefferson. I really look forward to games when he's out (though, again, I wish it were under different circumstances this time). Player movement improves by a factor of five without Al.


:roll: Wow 99 points in an overtime game...very impressive. We'll see.


I had to laugh at that one as well.


So, "smart" people, still miss Big Al? We just put up 103 on the road against the best defensive team in the NBA without him.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,132
And1: 17,633
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Game 44: Golden State Warriors (18-23) @ Utah Jazz (21-2 

Post#63 » by babyjax13 » Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:12 am

SLC Biz wrote:So, "smart" people, still miss Big Al? We just put up 103 on the road against the best defensive team in the NBA without him.


Al is a damn good player, I don't think that can be argued - but it's time to make room for the young guys and that means using the rest of the season to decide if Al or Paul (or neither) stays.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
SLC Biz
Junior
Posts: 390
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: Game 44: Golden State Warriors (18-23) @ Utah Jazz (21-2 

Post#64 » by SLC Biz » Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:17 am

Al is a horrible player and it's disguised by his high scoring. He doesn't draw fouls and he's shooting below 50% for the season. He also plays no defense and our ball movement is far worse with him.
ColdBlue
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,414
And1: 16
Joined: Feb 03, 2006

Re: Game 44: Golden State Warriors (18-23) @ Utah Jazz (21-2 

Post#65 » by ColdBlue » Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:47 am

SLC Biz wrote:So, "smart" people, still miss Big Al? We just put up 103 on the road against the best defensive team in the NBA without him.


I love anecdotal heroes like yourself. Reminds me of when I was a kid. Anyways...damn nice games from both Favors and Kanter... and Burks.

I still give the ball to Al in the post if I need a bucket... but that margin is getting slimmer by the day.
SLC Biz
Junior
Posts: 390
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: Game 44: Golden State Warriors (18-23) @ Utah Jazz (21-2 

Post#66 » by SLC Biz » Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:57 am

Sorry, I just can't help but be amused by the perception that our offense is doomed without Al.
User avatar
BJSmiles
Senior
Posts: 694
And1: 12
Joined: Jan 14, 2012

Re: Game 44: Golden State Warriors (18-23) @ Utah Jazz (21-2 

Post#67 » by BJSmiles » Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:19 am

103 against that Lakers. Legit.

Return to Utah Jazz