BigSlam wrote:Byron Mullens or DeAndre Jordan?
Mullens because he actually seems like he is improving upon the weak spots of his game.
Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben
BigSlam wrote:Byron Mullens or DeAndre Jordan?
Devilzsidewalk wrote:no, the DB's will just be thinking "damn, I thought that was going to be a run!" as they easily recover to intercept a Ponder pass 10 yards off the mark
BigSlam wrote:Byron Mullens or DeAndre Jordan?
captaincrunk wrote:BigSlam wrote:Byron Mullens or DeAndre Jordan?
Jordan on Mullen's contract, please.
penquin11 wrote:BigSlam wrote:Byron Mullens or DeAndre Jordan?
Mullens because he actually seems like he is improving upon the weak spots of his game.
BrotherDave wrote:captaincrunk wrote:BigSlam wrote:Byron Mullens or DeAndre Jordan?
Jordan on Mullen's contract, please.penquin11 wrote:BigSlam wrote:Byron Mullens or DeAndre Jordan?
Mullens because he actually seems like he is improving upon the weak spots of his game.
Their both right.
Rather have Mullens on his contract than Jordan on his.
SWedd523 wrote:Mully = 7 feet of smooth
Jordan = 7 feet of dumbass
BigSlam wrote:Keeping contracts out of it though and basing it purely on their games/personalities etc, who would you take?
BrotherDave wrote:I guess Mullens still. We can potentially have our own version of DeAndre in Biyombo already. Jordan only got paid so much b/c there are only so many bigs his size with his athleticism. A 7 footer with unlimited range might be even rarer.
BrotherDave wrote:I guess Mullens still. We can potentially have our own version of DeAndre in Biyombo already. Jordan only got paid so much b/c there are only so many bigs his size with his athleticism. A 7 footer with unlimited range might be even rarer.
BigSlam wrote:BrotherDave wrote:I guess Mullens still. We can potentially have our own version of DeAndre in Biyombo already. Jordan only got paid so much b/c there are only so many bigs his size with his athleticism. A 7 footer with unlimited range might be even rarer.
I think you are missing the point of the thread.