ImageImageImageImageImage

2012 NBA Draft - Part III

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,864
And1: 10,473
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#21 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:13 pm

7-Day Dray wrote:
WizarDynasty wrote:I think a new key measurable that wasn't taken as a standard less than 3 year ago is hand size. Hand size has a huge impact on a big's offensive game and having big hands can be measured before the draft.


Reportedly Anthony Davis can't palm a basketball. Would you not draft him because of that?


I am 5'8" and can palm a basketball. How is that possible that a guy that tall cannot?
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,555
And1: 23,021
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#22 » by nate33 » Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:20 pm

Image
Look how big his hand is relative to the ball. He can palm a basketball.
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#23 » by Severn Hoos » Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:08 pm

I think my preferred (if wildly unrealistic) scenario - outside of winning the Lotto and taking Davis - is to get #2 and have NO end up at #5. Would they trade their two 1sts (the other pick is #10 right now) to move up for a chance at Drummond or Robinson? We'd probably have to throw in something to balance it out - preferably Crawford, but we have a smorgasbord of rookie-scale talent for them to choose from (just not Seraphin). The Wiz then take Beal & Zeller and for fun let's say Crowder in the 2nd. Now that's an instant infusion of talent.


Portland at #7 & #11 is probably more realistic, but I don't want to trade out of Beal's range. If I thought he'd be there at 7 I'd do it, but that's unlikely.


Edit to add: The pitch to NO goes like this: "If you squint, Robinson & Crawford could be the new David West & JR Smith! You can reclaim those glory days!"
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,555
And1: 23,021
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#24 » by nate33 » Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:34 pm

Severn Hoos wrote:I think my preferred (if wildly unrealistic) scenario - outside of winning the Lotto and taking Davis - is to get #2 and have NO end up at #5. Would they trade their two 1sts (the other pick is #10 right now) to move up for a chance at Drummond or Robinson? We'd probably have to throw in something to balance it out - preferably Crawford, but we have a smorgasbord of rookie-scale talent for them to choose from (just not Seraphin). The Wiz then take Beal & Zeller and for fun let's say Crowder in the 2nd. Now that's an instant infusion of talent.


Portland at #7 & #11 is probably more realistic, but I don't want to trade out of Beal's range. If I thought he'd be there at 7 I'd do it, but that's unlikely.


Edit to add: The pitch to NO goes like this: "If you squint, Robinson & Crawford could be the new David West & JR Smith! You can reclaim those glory days!"

I'd definitely make that trade, Severn Hoos. I'd throw in Crawford or Chris Singleton without thinking twice. If they asked for Booker, it would be tough. The trade would still ultimately improve the team because James Singleton could step in for Booker, but I'd hate to give away Booker so easily.

I'm still not that excited about grabbing Tyler Zeller at #10 though. We don't need a center. We have Nene and Seraphin already. If we got Beal at #5, I might take a gamble on Perry Jones at #10 if he was still there. Then use our 2 seconds plus maybe some cash to trade up for a pick high enough in the first round to ensure that we get Crowder.

PG Wall/Mack
SG Beal/Mason
SF Crowder/C.Martin/P.Jones
PF Booker/J.Singleton/Vesely
C Nene/Seraphin

That gives us a rotation ready to compete right away, plus some high upside potential at the end of the bench in Jones and Vesely. There are enough heady vets in the rotation (Mason, Martin, Singleton and Nene) to keep the team on an even keel.
User avatar
Ed Wood
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 330
Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Location: I appreciate Kevin Seraphin's affinity for hacks
Contact:
   

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#25 » by Ed Wood » Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:22 pm

Nate I would have thought that you, of all people, would be sufficiently equipped with congenital pessimism and conscious skepticism to reject the hand waving argument that a less than exceptional shooting power forward is absolved of unimpressive results because he he'd be better off at a position that would demand even more skill. If there really is sentiment in the Jones camp that he's been ill used as a power forward that's simply another reason to be unenthusiastic about drafting him. Remember the law of tweeners: better in all cases playing up a position.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,555
And1: 23,021
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#26 » by nate33 » Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:51 pm

Ed Wood wrote:Nate I would have thought that you, of all people, would be sufficiently equipped with congenital pessimism and conscious skepticism to reject the hand waving argument that a less than exceptional shooting power forward is absolved of unimpressive results because he he'd be better off at a position that would demand even more skill. If there really is sentiment in the Jones camp that he's been ill used as a power forward that's simply another reason to be unenthusiastic about drafting him. Remember the law of tweeners: better in all cases playing up a position.

Fair enough. I didn't mean to across like I'm endorsing Perry Jones. I'm just saying we should look for the maximum upside player at a position of need (SG or SF) rather than get a center. I don't really know who that guy is.

I haven't watched enough college basketball to have much of an informed position on anybody outside of the top 5 or so. I leave the draft debate to guys like Dat2U, Ruzious, SevernHoos, Doc, CCJ and Consiglieri.
WizarDynasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,602
And1: 275
Joined: Oct 23, 2003

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#27 » by WizarDynasty » Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:11 pm

If I am at two I am definitely taking drummond. Beal and mkg don't have quick first steps and neither dominates college competition. Drummond with two years of schooling under nene should get us any wing player in the nba. (TRade drummond in three years for Harden danny granger or rudy gay.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,555
And1: 23,021
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#28 » by nate33 » Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:01 am

WizarDynasty wrote:If I am at two I am definitely taking drummond. Beal and mkg don't have quick first steps and neither dominates college competition.

Yes, because Drummond averaged 10.0 points 7.6 rebounds and 2.6 FTA attempts per game at the college level. Utter domination. And lots of team success too. Beal and MKG can't compare.
WizarDynasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,602
And1: 275
Joined: Oct 23, 2003

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#29 » by WizarDynasty » Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:25 am

If we didn't have Nene, I would be very wary of drafting Drummond, but luckily we got Nene for 4 years and if Nene transfer half of his knowledge and heart to Drummond, Drummond should be able to get us an elite wingplayer via trade. Beal and MKG are pretty much playing to the best of their abilities right now.
If beal has 7'0 wingspan, explosive first step and the ability to finish through contact....but also a low BBIQ...he would be andre drummond. I see a higher return with Drummond in three years mainly because of Nene and Drummond's untapped physical potential. Beal is running ath 98 percent capacity with no significant room for improvement in my opinion because of lack of size and lack explosive first step and MKG while a great hustle player in the mold of Chris Singleton is not going to dominate as a small forward in the nba. Open floor he is pretty good and he has a good motor but in three years, i don't see him having any close to the same trade value as a Nene coached Drummond.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#30 » by dangermouse » Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:01 am

Ed Wood wrote:Would it not be possible in that situation to dangle the opportunity to draft Harrison Barnes for Utah or potentially Portland and add something like Sullinger or Zeller as well as someone like Lillard with the second pick? That seems like a pretty decent consolation prize if things turn pear shaped during the lottery process. Add a couple of wing players in free agency and hopefully at least one solid selection with the two second rounders and that wouldn't be the worst off season. Just to show that I too can write names with slashes next to them:

Wall/Lillard
Green (Danny)/Crawford/Denmon
Green (Gerald)/Crowder/Singleton
Nene/Booker/Vesely
Seraphin/Zeller

Not so bad, really.


No to Gerald Green. No to more dummies.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#31 » by truwizfan4evr » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:03 am

dangermouse wrote:
Ed Wood wrote:Would it not be possible in that situation to dangle the opportunity to draft Harrison Barnes for Utah or potentially Portland and add something like Sullinger or Zeller as well as someone like Lillard with the second pick? That seems like a pretty decent consolation prize if things turn pear shaped during the lottery process. Add a couple of wing players in free agency and hopefully at least one solid selection with the two second rounders and that wouldn't be the worst off season. Just to show that I too can write names with slashes next to them:

Wall/Lillard
Green (Danny)/Crawford/Denmon
Green (Gerald)/Crowder/Singleton
Nene/Booker/Vesely
Seraphin/Zeller

Not so bad, really.


No to Gerald Green. No to more dummies.[/quote ] I agree. But I don't count out us getting Andre Drummond if we happen to get number 5 pick or worst. Nene and drummond could be a force for many years to come. If Andre develop faster then people expect.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#32 » by truwizfan4evr » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:16 am

What first rounder do you guys expect to slip into the second round? In 2009 Dejuan Blair slipped to 37 pick. Who is your Dejuan Blair for this up coming draft?
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,136
And1: 6,869
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#33 » by doclinkin » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:38 am

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
7-Day Dray wrote:
WizarDynasty wrote:I think a new key measurable that wasn't taken as a standard less than 3 year ago is hand size. Hand size has a huge impact on a big's offensive game and having big hands can be measured before the draft.


Reportedly Anthony Davis can't palm a basketball. Would you not draft him because of that?


I am 5'8" and can palm a basketball. How is that possible that a guy that tall cannot?


Patrick Ewing had little birdie hands and could not palm a ball. Rik Smits couldn't. I recall a Spanish interview where Marc Gasol said he couldn't. Pretty sure Pau Gasol can't. Kendrick Perkins has wee hands as well.
7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#34 » by 7-Day Dray » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:24 am

doclinkin wrote:Patrick Ewing had little birdie hands and could not palm a ball. Rik Smits couldn't. I recall a Spanish interview where Marc Gasol said he couldn't. Pretty sure Pau Gasol can't. Kendrick Perkins has wee hands as well.


I know for a fact Pau Gasol can. I see him do it easily all the time during games.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,136
And1: 6,869
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#35 » by doclinkin » Fri Apr 13, 2012 4:03 am

Okay my mistake.

In other news one of the players I was tracking Wendell McKines is playing well in Portsmouth. Kim English acquitted himself alright, and I'm watching this dude Agustus Gilchrist who's also piling up solid numbers.
User avatar
Knighthonor
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,865
And1: 98
Joined: Feb 15, 2012

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#36 » by Knighthonor » Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:19 am

Honestly, nobody in the draft looks interesting for the Wizards besides Davis which may have trade potential
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,937
And1: 9,319
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#37 » by queridiculo » Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:33 am

Knighthonor wrote:Honestly, nobody in the draft looks interesting for the Wizards besides Davis which may have trade potential


Thanks for that dose of reality.

Maybe we can trade Davis to the Nuggets for a resigned McGee?
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#38 » by truwizfan4evr » Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:55 am

Knighthonor wrote:Honestly, nobody in the draft looks interesting for the Wizards besides Davis which may have trade potential

Its alot of good players wizards can get in this year Draft. Very deep draft we have here.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#39 » by truwizfan4evr » Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:23 am

Does Thomas Robinson has all star potential? He more athletic then people give him credit for. His jumper is steady improving also. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkZbmKIhwAo He Got hops.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
jangles86
Starter
Posts: 2,381
And1: 982
Joined: Jun 02, 2011
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#40 » by jangles86 » Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:25 am

Have Beal Harrison and MKG declared?

For reward for tanking the 2nd and 3rd picks are not great value compared to the years.
I think if we get pick one two three or four our picks will be out of Davis, MKG, t-rob or Drummond

Taking anyone of them will all result in either Vesely, Booker or Singleton being traded. I personally see booker having the best value.

Return to Washington Wizards