If tonights effort reflects the teams desire to compete in the playoffs, we weren't gonna last long anyways. I don't think getting blownout in a quick series is all that beneficial in terms of development for our younger players. A close, competitive series would be great. But I just can't see it given how we've played recently, especially if we drew the 8th seed (thunder). I'll take the pick and be on my way.
Gonna be a stressful last three games of the season, since those are the only games I see the warriors winning to stay in that 8 spot.
Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
- countrybama24
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,182
- And1: 25
- Joined: Jan 05, 2010
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
- Ming Kong!
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,480
- And1: 31
- Joined: Nov 21, 2002
- Location: Jazz fan in Miami, FL.
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
SLC Biz wrote:UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:
Oh ya, it's not like we didn't beat them on the road earlier this year or anything... totally implausible.
Ever heard of Zach Randolph? He makes the Grizzlies just a tad better.
Not to mention we have a ton of injuries:
John Howard
CJ Miles
Earl Watson
Jeremy Evans
Raja Bell
We are playing a D-League guy as our starting SF and Tinsley (or Harris) as our backup SG, which renders Hayward far less useful. The guys injured are basically scrubs, but our rotation is way out of wack now. We need to dump all those guys this summer and get a real damn SF and draft a PG. This team is pathetic as stands.
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 776
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 25, 2002
- Location: Moscow, ID
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
Easily the most disgusted I have been with this team all year. I don't even think its about heart - you have to act like a professioal and do your damn job...that's all.
Re: Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16
- jazzgasm
- Junior
- Posts: 379
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 29, 2011
Re: Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16
russnumber3 wrote:Easily the most disgusted I have been with this team all year. I don't even think its about heart - you have to act like a professioal and do your damn job...that's all.
Definitely a tough loss to stomach

Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
- Wolverine
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,271
- And1: 119
- Joined: Jul 27, 2002
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
Ming Kong! wrote:SLC Biz wrote:UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:
Oh ya, it's not like we didn't beat them on the road earlier this year or anything... totally implausible.
Ever heard of Zach Randolph? He makes the Grizzlies just a tad better.
Not to mention we have a ton of injuries:
John Howard
CJ Miles
Earl Watson
Jeremy Evans
Raja Bell
We are playing a D-League guy as our starting SF and Tinsley (or Harris) as our backup SG, which renders Hayward far less useful. The guys injured are basically scrubs, but our rotation is way out of wack now. We need to dump all those guys this summer and get a real damn SF and draft a PG. This team is pathetic as stands.
John Howard hahahaha as an Aussie thats hilarious!
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
- Jazz_Man_86
- Junior
- Posts: 457
- And1: 18
- Joined: Jan 03, 2010
-
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
ugly loss. We beat memphis\houston and then loose to NO. Sick.
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,110
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
I really dont think we played that bad. I actually think we played well they just played better. Gordon kicked our ass but he is that good. I hate that we loss but Im not angry about it as usual becuase I think we played up to our potential. New Orleans with all its players is better than Utah, Houston, Phoenix, and Denver but they were hurt or didnt want to play this year unfortuantely for the Jazz until now.
Top 4 seed in the West!!! Guaranteed!!!
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,769
- And1: 279
- Joined: Apr 04, 2009
- Location: Utah
-
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
You guys act like losing those guys to injury has made us worse...Ming Kong! wrote:SLC Biz wrote:UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:
Oh ya, it's not like we didn't beat them on the road earlier this year or anything... totally implausible.
Ever heard of Zach Randolph? He makes the Grizzlies just a tad better.
Not to mention we have a ton of injuries:
John Howard
CJ Miles
Earl Watson
Jeremy Evans
Raja Bell
We are playing a D-League guy as our starting SF and Tinsley (or Harris) as our backup SG, which renders Hayward far less useful. The guys injured are basically scrubs, but our rotation is way out of wack now. We need to dump all those guys this summer and get a real damn SF and draft a PG. This team is pathetic as stands.
Pretty sure every one on here wanted all of those players (other than Evans) to get LESS playing time. What's the big problem with not having them now?
Also, Zach Randolph is still working his way back into the game. They've been bringing him off the bench... he's not making them THAT much better.
Jerry Sloan >>>>>>>> Everything else.
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,067
- And1: 87
- Joined: Jan 20, 2006
- Location: Italy
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
A semi-healthy Hornets team is certainly much better than their record would indicate, I watched them quite a bit this season and I think Monty Williams has done a great job with them. They always hustle, play hard and now they're not looking to tank. Eric Gordon can really be a dominant scorer in this league, his ability to change speeds, always stay under control when driving and either finishing in traffic or finding an open man was amazing.
Having said that, this was just a horrible game for the Jazz. No energy, no heart. Big Al was a total liability (don't care about his shooting stats, when he gave up just as much to Kaman, didn't rebound, was nowhere to be found on help D, couldn't move the ball offensively), no one could even dream of slowing Eric Gordon down, Hayward was too passive, Harris was non-existent except for a few bad turnovers. Only lineup that worked was with the bench players in and we went away from it. It's a travesty that Favors is still only getting little more than 20 minutes.
Having said that, this was just a horrible game for the Jazz. No energy, no heart. Big Al was a total liability (don't care about his shooting stats, when he gave up just as much to Kaman, didn't rebound, was nowhere to be found on help D, couldn't move the ball offensively), no one could even dream of slowing Eric Gordon down, Hayward was too passive, Harris was non-existent except for a few bad turnovers. Only lineup that worked was with the bench players in and we went away from it. It's a travesty that Favors is still only getting little more than 20 minutes.
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
-
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,794
- And1: 1,087
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
These are th games that kill you...... Loosing to Sacramento and NO, when you are fighting for the playoffs is inexcusable......
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 18,795
- And1: 2,165
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-
Re: Game 60: Utah Jazz (31-28) @ New Orleans Hornets (16-42)
I don't think they played so bad... but they did not played as good as vs Rockets.
We need more from Harris and Hayward.
Millsap played great, as Favors. Jefferson did his thing in offense.
Gordon killed us.
We need more from Harris and Hayward.
Millsap played great, as Favors. Jefferson did his thing in offense.
Gordon killed us.
