ImageImageImageImageImage

2012 NBA Draft - Part III

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#81 » by truwizfan4evr » Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:59 pm

The Consiglieri wrote:
truwizfan4evr wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:No.

4th pick would be the last of the big 4 (Davis, Beal, MKG, Robinson)
5th Pick would be the last of the big 4, or Drummond if he falls, or a trade down of Drummond
6th pick would be a trade down, or holding your nose and taking the highest upside guy, probably PJ3 or Sully or Zeller, though I'd do everything and anything to move out six unless one of the big 4 was there or Drummond.

Barnes fell out of my top 10 w/how he played down the stretch. There are much better options than him. The good news seems to be that he isn't in our top 5, the bad news is i have no idea who would be sixth for us, and I imagine it would be one of Sully, Barnes, or PJ3, and it could very well be Barnes (though I tend to think Barnes absolutely hosed himself with how he played down the stretch).

We're basically in a position where if we play 3-4 or 4-3 down the stretch were a lock for no worse than sixth, and if we go 2-5 to 3-4 were almost certainly a lock for no worse than fifth.

new Orleans has 3 games up on wizards we almost a lock for second worst record in nba. So we cant finish no worst then fifth pick. Witch will be better then what we had last draft at six pick.


Past couple of years I've seen the Nats, Wizards, and Redskins all significantly outproduce expectations in terms of wins seriously risking draft slotting (got really lucky with Bryce and Strass, barely holding off other opponents, the Wizards repeatedly screwed up slotting with solid runs down the stretch the previous 3 seasons, and of course the redskins vastly outpaced expectations in 2010 and 2011 when they were projected to be the worst team both seasons, and instead finished 23rd, and 27th instead losing out on the Newton/Miller/AJ Green/Peterson sweepstakes, and the Luck/RG3 sweepstakes this year, and as a result having to engage in a massive asset removing overpay to get RG3 this month). I never count anything as locked in until the final game is over.

According to all information available, Barnes is not in our top 5 period. I do not know if he's the guy at 6 though and can't speak to that. He very well could be, which is one of the absolutely essential reasons for us to hold the 2 slot pre-lottery.

I do not like Barnes in are top 5. But I don't believe he is as bad as he show down the stretch in the last games in the NCAA tournament. He will be a solid player in the nba. Maybe runner up for the all star team. But I agree they're better prospect then him one threw five on the draft board.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
fugop
Veteran
Posts: 2,744
And1: 9
Joined: Aug 09, 2004

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#82 » by fugop » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:15 pm

Honestly, I expect that we're going to sign Jeff Green over the offseason, so we'll avoid Barnes.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,137
And1: 6,869
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#83 » by doclinkin » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:18 pm

WizarDynasty wrote: I won't say this again


You promise?
User avatar
Knighthonor
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,865
And1: 98
Joined: Feb 15, 2012

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#84 » by Knighthonor » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:54 pm

DallasShalDune wrote:T-Rob is a future all star. Book it. I'd pick him second. We'd have a great frontline with holes only at back up PG and wing players.



that wont solve a thing. no shooters.

defensive teams only have to play the paint, and the wizards lose.

this has been demonstrated in the current season
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#85 » by truwizfan4evr » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:02 pm

Knighthonor wrote:
DallasShalDune wrote:T-Rob is a future all star. Book it. I'd pick him second. We'd have a great frontline with holes only at back up PG and wing players.



that wont solve a thing. no shooters.

defensive teams only have to play the paint, and the wizards lose.

this has been demonstrated in the current season

We can draft a shooter or sign a free agent. Talent first shooter second. If you can get a guy like Thomas Robinson or MKG. You have to get them and find shooters later. Look at bulls they a good defensive team. Kyle Krover is basically there only really out side shooter they depend on every game.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,881
And1: 1,055
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#86 » by The Consiglieri » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:17 pm

truwizfan4evr wrote:I do not like Barnes in are top 5. But I don't believe he is as bad as he show down the stretch in the last games in the NCAA tournament. He will be a solid player in the nba. Maybe runner up for the all star team. But I agree they're better prospect then him one threw five on the draft board.


I think the stretch run was revealing, as if he wasn't being set up perfectly by Marshall he completely floundered and could not contribute a whit in other areas of the game. He was a disaster. Invisible. No, I don't think he's that bad, btw, I think he'll be a solid pro because he's a very good to good shooter. He'll be able to contribute, but you shouldn't pay a premium in draft slot value for a guy who will contribute as little as he will, the definitiveness with which he will never be a great player (at least Perry Jones III, Drummond, hell even lower level guys like Rivers, Meyers Leonard, Lillard, Wrotten, and Waiters actually have the potential to be great), and the mentality he brings to the game (passivity, and mediocre moter). I like his BBIQ, I like his technical ability as a scorer, but i like absolutely nothing else, and considering you can find guys that can score and do little else throughout the draft for very little cost, why pay top dollar for Barnes? Why do that? There's no reason, I'm only going to go with that direction when we've exhausted all reasonable options with higher upside/potential/and BBIQ/motor combos, and I can find at least 10-12 guys, maybe 15, that fit that label. The team on the other hand probably has him rated somewhere between 6 and 12.
Silvie Lysandra
Starter
Posts: 2,196
And1: 465
Joined: May 22, 2007
   

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#87 » by Silvie Lysandra » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:46 pm

The Consiglieri wrote: and of course the redskins vastly outpaced expectations in 2010 and 2011 when they were projected to be the worst team both seasons, and instead finished 23rd, and 27th instead losing out on the Newton/Miller/AJ Green/Peterson sweepstakes, and the Luck/RG3 sweepstakes this year, and as a result having to engage in a massive asset removing overpay to get RG3 this month). I never count anything as locked in until the final game is over.
.


The Redskins were never going to be the worst team in the NFL either year.

If anything, the year we massively overachieved was 2009 - we could have and probably should have gone 2-14 or 1-15, but we won some close games against awful teams (lucky for us - we got stud LT Trent Williams and not the massively overrated Sam Bradford, and there's nothing worse than locking yourself into a mediocre QB).

2010, you could say we overachieved, but we also lost a lot of close games as well
2011: We were never going to go 2-14, we added too much on both sides of the ball and had too good a draft. If not for injuries and bad luck, we could have been in the playoff mix.

Also, tanking in the NFL is more risky and more corrosive than it is in the NFL because the lower number of games makes each loss more meaningful.

As for the draft, I want Davis > MKG > Beal. I know Beal is the better skillset fit, but the length and athleticism of a Nene/Vesely/MKG frontcourt with Singleton/Booker/KS off the bench is tantalizing.
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#88 » by truwizfan4evr » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:51 pm

The Consiglieri wrote:
truwizfan4evr wrote:I do not like Barnes in are top 5. But I don't believe he is as bad as he show down the stretch in the last games in the NCAA tournament. He will be a solid player in the nba. Maybe runner up for the all star team. But I agree they're better prospect then him one threw five on the draft board.


I think the stretch run was revealing, as if he wasn't being set up perfectly by Marshall he completely floundered and could not contribute a whit in other areas of the game. He was a disaster. Invisible. No, I don't think he's that bad, btw, I think he'll be a solid pro because he's a very good to good shooter. He'll be able to contribute, but you shouldn't pay a premium in draft slot value for a guy who will contribute as little as he will, the definitiveness with which he will never be a great player (at least Perry Jones III, Drummond, hell even lower level guys like Rivers, Meyers Leonard, Lillard, Wrotten, and Waiters actually have the ability to be great), and the mentality he brings to the game (passivity, and mediocre moter). I like his BBIQ, I like his technical ability as a scorer, but i like absolutely nothing else, and considering you can find guys that can score and do little else throughout the draft for very little cost, why pay top dollar for Barnes? Why do that? There's no reason, I'm only going to go with that direction when we've exhausted all reasonable options with higher upside/potential/and BBIQ/motor combos, and I can find at least 10-12 guys, maybe 15, that fit that label. The team on the other hand probably has him rated somewhere between 6 and 12.

I agree with what you say. It just we have Ernie.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,881
And1: 1,055
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#89 » by The Consiglieri » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:16 pm

Chaos Revenant wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote: and of course the redskins vastly outpaced expectations in 2010 and 2011 when they were projected to be the worst team both seasons, and instead finished 23rd, and 27th instead losing out on the Newton/Miller/AJ Green/Peterson sweepstakes, and the Luck/RG3 sweepstakes this year, and as a result having to engage in a massive asset removing overpay to get RG3 this month). I never count anything as locked in until the final game is over.
.


The Redskins were never going to be the worst team in the NFL either year.

If anything, the year we massively overachieved was 2009 - we could have and probably should have gone 2-14 or 1-15, but we won some close games against awful teams (lucky for us - we got stud LT Trent Williams and not the massively overrated Sam Bradford, and there's nothing worse than locking yourself into a mediocre QB).

2010, you could say we overachieved, but we also lost a lot of close games as well
2011: We were never going to go 2-14, we added too much on both sides of the ball and had too good a draft. If not for injuries and bad luck, we could have been in the playoff mix.

Also, tanking in the NFL is more risky and more corrosive than it is in the NFL because the lower number of games makes each loss more meaningful.

As for the draft, I want Davis > MKG > Beal. I know Beal is the better skillset fit, but the length and athleticism of a Nene/Vesely/MKG frontcourt with Singleton/Booker/KS off the bench is tantalizing.


The Redskins were judged by scouts around the league to have uniformally the worst collection of talent in the NFL in 2010. THE WORST. Just as bad, if not worst, the Redskins were also seen to have the least depth in the NFL. THE LEAST. That's what happens when you have the worst F.O. in the NFL that trades away picks for veteran has been's, and never was's, and in bird brained pick for pick trades, and of course the war room moves on draft day as well which were traditionally league worst. In 2011 the Redskins were picked more than any other team I came across to finish as the bottom of the barrell suck for Luck winner.

Mike Shannahan put a stop to that, even w/hare brained stupid moves like the McNabb trade (which I bashed at the time, as an idiotic and fallaciously reasoned, but explicable move to get a bridge QB), winning far more games than expected by anyone.

Its funny, I disagree w/you across the board. Williams is actually a borderline bust, having not lived up to the hype, and being one positive weed test away from a year long suspension and a sabotaged career. I don't think he's a bust, he's just what was advertised, a high upside, high risk LT prospect that played way better as a RT than LT in college, and while a better match for the ZBS than Okung, is a definitively inferior LT to him.

As for Bradford. Mediocre QB? Tell me what QB in the league would light up the scoreboard after losing five of their top 7 WR's to season long, or majority of the season long injuries in your first two years, then add in injuries both years to Steven Jackson, killing your running game, than add a horrible OL, and pitiful defense. Bradford was sabotaged by all of these things AND injuries. He's a franchise QB in search of a weapon, one freaking weapon, and a line. There's a reason he was rated so highly, and a reason we tried to get him in a trade up. He's a fantastic prospect that did not walk into a beautiful situation like Rodgers (great WR's, great team) or Manning (best RB and WR in the NFL), or Newton (fantastic rb's, and a pro bowl WR and solid TE), or Stafford (Calvin Johnson, and best 1-2 punch TE combo in the league, as well as elite complimentary WR's), or Ryan (Roddy White, a good running game, a pro bowl TE, and Julio Jones now).

What did Sam Bradford have? A bunch of garbage, a broken down pathetic nearly league worst OL, and an injured stud RB and poor D (beyond the front 4).

As to tanking. No NFL team will ever do it, careers are way too short for players, and patience from owners is dramatically less than with other sports, but for fans, it has inumerable patently obvious pay offs, take the packers winning a pointless game in a season finale in 1988 and handing the Cowboys 3 super bowls as a result (Aikman), take Manning or Leaf, take Bledsoe or Mirer, take the difference between us sweeping the giants or getting swept by them costing us 2 future #1's and a 2012 2nd rounder? Take the history of 2nd overall taken QB's in the NFL (awful). It's more important than its ever been in history now because the NFL has been completely tailored to be manipulated by elite passing offenses (almost every rule imaginable in the league passed in recent years, handing QB's and WR's massive advantages against defenses, this is precisely why WR's and QB's have suddenly become productive in their rookie years (something that never happened in the past-exceptions: Marino, and Moss, good luck finding any others if you go pre aughts, and note the massive devaluation of the RB, affordable for cheap on draft day and in free agency alike) making QB's more valuable than ever in the history of the game.

To tank in the NFL can be absolutely essential. You don't win in this sport without a franchise QB, and you don't get a franchise QB without sucking out loud. Sure there are incredibly rare exceptions (point to Tom Brady, and I'll ask you to look for any HOF QB besides him to be drafted that low in the last thirty years, Unitas was much much much longer ago, point to Drew Brees, and I'll say he went 1st overall in round 2, point to Schaub and I'll say he's valued the same now as he always was, a lot of potential, but little actual pay off), and then how often can you get these guys in their prime w/o drafting them? Virtually NEVER. You have to tank to get them, you have to tank, or get really lucky to get their stud LT, or buy an aging one I suppose. Now stud DE's are less predictable, pass rushers, one of the 4 building blocks of dynastys, are a bit harder to scout, and miss a lot more, so sometimes teams get them outside round 1 (the giants are genius at this, having found the majority of their elite pass rushers like Osi, Strahan, and Kiawanuka, and the other guy whose name eludes me, outside of round 1, ditto the steelers, who stole a Michigan LB in mid-round 2, and turned him into one of the best pass rushers in the league in Lamar Woodley).

Anyway, ive been off topic enough.
User avatar
gesa2
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,274
And1: 404
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Warwick MD
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#90 » by gesa2 » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:19 pm

The Consiglieri wrote:No.

4th pick would be the last of the big 4 (Davis, Beal, MKG, Robinson)
5th Pick would be the last of the big 4, or Drummond if he falls, or a trade down of Drummond
6th pick would be a trade down, or holding your nose and taking the highest upside guy, probably PJ3 or Sully or Zeller, though I'd do everything and anything to move out six unless one of the big 4 was there or Drummond.

Barnes fell out of my top 10 w/how he played down the stretch. There are much better options than him. The good news seems to be that he isn't in our top 5, the bad news is i have no idea who would be sixth for us, and I imagine it would be one of Sully, Barnes, or PJ3, and it could very well be Barnes (though I tend to think Barnes absolutely hosed himself with how he played down the stretch).

We're basically in a position where if we play 3-4 or 4-3 down the stretch were a lock for no worse than sixth, and if we go 2-5 to 3-4 were almost certainly a lock for no worse than fifth.


This is exactly how I see it Consiglieri. It's going to be a little nerve racking until we are sure of the second worse record, but after that it's just praying that our 88% odds of getting in the top 4 come through.
Making extreme statements like "only" sounds like there are "no" Jokics in this draft? Jokic is an engine that was drafted in the 2nd round. Always a chance to see diamond dropped by sloppy burgular after a theft.
-WizD
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,561
And1: 23,026
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#91 » by nate33 » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:29 pm

truwizfan4evr wrote:
Rafael122 wrote:
truwizfan4evr wrote:If wizards land forth pick threw six pick would anyone consider Harrison Barnes? He struggled in big moment in college but he would be a nice fit with john wall. Don't get me wrong I don't have him in my top 5 but is he someone to consider when the guys we want is off the board?


Top 5 players: Davis, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Bradley Beal, Thomas Robinson.

If we land in the top 5, we'll get one of them. But if we have the 6th pick, I would look into trading down, maybe with a team like Portland, have them give the Wizards their other lottery pick and see what we could do there.

Well remember who are general manger is. I'm almost certain Barnes is high on his draft board as a top five or six pick.

Why do people keep saying stuff like this? EG has a darn good record in the draft (when he doesn't trade the pick, that is). I see no reason at all to believe he is inclined to draft Barnes.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,345
And1: 7,448
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#92 » by FAH1223 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:42 am

nate33 wrote:Why do people keep saying stuff like this? EG has a darn good record in the draft (when he doesn't trade the pick, that is). I see no reason at all to believe he is inclined to draft Barnes.


He is an EG guy. Dude has so much potential that he will never realize.
Image
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#93 » by truwizfan4evr » Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:46 am

FAH1223 wrote:
nate33 wrote:Why do people keep saying stuff like this? EG has a darn good record in the draft (when he doesn't trade the pick, that is). I see no reason at all to believe he is inclined to draft Barnes.


He is an EG guy. Dude has so much potential that he will never realize.

Excatly, my point
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,666
And1: 4,545
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#94 » by closg00 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:21 pm

From Chad Ford's Draft 3.0

Analysis: Kidd-Gilchrist, like the other Kentucky players, still hasn't officially declared for the draft, but he will. The Wizards desperately need MKG's leadership, toughness and work ethic. But I hear they also may be tempted by Brad Beal's shooting and the upside of Andre Drummond. I think the Beal vs. Kidd-Gilchrist scenario is a toss-up. But after the Kwame Brown and JaVale McGee experiences, I would be surprised if Washington chased Drummond.


This should serve-notice that if we end-up picking 5th, watch-out!!! More "Upside" could be coming.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,661
And1: 1,341
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#95 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:41 pm

Updated mocks Draftexpress has Wizards taking Drummond #2, NBAdraft.net has them taking Robinson.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,881
And1: 1,055
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#96 » by The Consiglieri » Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:09 pm

I think its reasonable, after the first 2-3 are gone, he starts making an argument for himself, after 3-4 are gone, he's positively shouting for his value, if we are lotto-screwed, and are at say 5, and he's the last guy on the bench to pick from, the pick HAS to be him, or we have to trade down. That's yet another reason why last nights loss was so huge. 3.5 lead on New Orleans w/6 for us to play, and with only 2-3 winnable games left (@ Cleveland, @ Charlotte, or one of the games against the playoff contenders @ Chicago, home and home vs Miami, or the home game against Milwaukee) the team has nearly locked in a bottom 2 pre-lotto finish, and I have a real, real hard time imagining that we could have a second year in a row in which the bottom 3 (holding 60% chance alone of winning the lottery), would all be jumped yet again. If we lock in a bottom 2 finish, I'm fairly confident we'll slot in between 1 and 4.

Add to that the interest in who would come off the board ahead of us if we slipped, as the valuations of MKG, Beal, Robinson and Drummond are distinctly different depending upon which teams board you're peering at.
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#97 » by truwizfan4evr » Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:27 pm

All the guys we name Beal,MKG,Robinson and Andre Drummond are all good picks Let's just win the number 1 pick! Some reason I just feel Bobcats will get him. Since there team is a mess. Even more then the wizards. But we could as well get him also we have the second most ping pong balls.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
Benjammin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,489
And1: 636
Joined: Jan 18, 2003

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#98 » by Benjammin » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:08 pm

SUPERBALLMAN wrote:Updated mocks Draftexpress has Wizards taking Drummond #2, NBAdraft.net has them taking Robinson.


You must not have taken this into account:

Team needs have NOT yet been taken into account in this mock draft.

From DraftExpress.com http://www.draftexpress.com#ixzz1s95F2pHQ
http://www.draftexpress.com

So, in other words, it's worthless in regards to whatever plan the Wizards may or may not have.
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#99 » by rockymac52 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:49 pm

I can't see any way the Wizards take a risk with this pick, and go for a project player or a raw player with "potential" (Andre Drummond or Perry Jones). This team has so few NBA caliber players as is, we need to get someone who can contribute somewhat next season. We can't afford to wait around on young kids as they take years to develop any longer.

This isn't just my personal opinion about what we SHOULD do, it's also what I strongly believe Ted, EG, and the rest of the Wizards front office WILL do. They might fall in love with a guy like Barnes that we might not be that fond of, but I just can't see them taking a risk with this selection (unless we somehow acquire a second top ten pick).
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part III 

Post#100 » by dangermouse » Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:09 am

Would the Celtics give us one of their late picks for Booker?

I dont know why, but im more excited about a few of the late-round picks than the early lotto (bar Davis). I think there are a few steals to be had that will turn into great rotational players and even a few starters.

I think i need to go watch some T-Rob highlight reels, I'm just not feeling him as a "home run" like i was a few months ago, for some reason. Ive got MKG higher, even though T-Rob fits us to a T. I see Crash/Iggy/a little Pippen in MKG, and with C. Singleton seemingly not working out for us he could slide in and start right away.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.

Return to Washington Wizards