ImageImageImageImageImage

Anaheim

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

kevin44
Pro Prospect
Posts: 760
And1: 25
Joined: Dec 17, 2003

Anaheim 

Post#1 » by kevin44 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:27 pm

A basketball official close to the situation but unauthorized to speak publicly said the Kings' owners' "focus is still on Anaheim," and a future relocation to the Honda Center perhaps as soon as the 2013-14 season. Honda Center is getting a 20 million renovation to upgrade for an NBA team. Anaheim passed a $75 million dollar bond last year in an effort to get an NBA team. Stern said he can't & won't do anything more to keep the Kings in Sac. The bond money would payoff Sacramento. Samueli can loan the Maloofs money to relocate using the Kings as collateral promising them more luxury boxes, higher ticket prices, better attendance, increase in merchandise sold & more tv money.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: Anaheim 

Post#2 » by pillwenney » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:21 pm

The problem here, I would think, would still be how much it would piss off Sterling and Buss.
LBCsun49
Banned User
Posts: 771
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 09, 2012

Re: Anaheim 

Post#3 » by LBCsun49 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:33 pm

Why notsan Diego?
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: Anaheim 

Post#4 » by pillwenney » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:39 pm

If they're going anywhere, I'd hope for Seattle. Anaheim seems to be what they want though.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Anaheim 

Post#5 » by SacKingZZZ » Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:26 am

The funny thing about the luxury box issue, is under the agreement with Samueli, so much of what they said they needed in Sac, they basically all but gave up in that deal. The luxury box thing had them getting like a small percentage or something like that. It was truly ridiculous.
wizfan81
Ballboy
Posts: 42
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 06, 2008

Re: Anaheim 

Post#6 » by wizfan81 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:38 am

san diego has no arena...so that will never happen.

two, samueli can write a fat check up to the lakers to make buss happy. samueli is in this to get a team in anaheim, at any cost.
User avatar
Sacramento_King
Rookie
Posts: 1,144
And1: 79
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: Anaheim 

Post#7 » by Sacramento_King » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:55 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:The funny thing about the luxury box issue, is under the agreement with Samueli, so much of what they said they needed in Sac, they basically all but gave up in that deal. The luxury box thing had them getting like a small percentage or something like that. It was truly ridiculous.


Yeah, it shows there stupidity from a business standpoint or how much they really want to get out of Sac. Either way is bad for us.
Call Me Geoff
Junior
Posts: 416
And1: 68
Joined: Jun 21, 2008

Re: Anaheim 

Post#8 » by Call Me Geoff » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:37 pm

Orange County is a really large market for the Lakers. It has a huge effect on the value of the Lakers as well. Much like the A's and Giants. I'd be VERY surprised if Jerry Buss didn't resist a Kings move to Anaheim. There is not enough money that would make it worth Dr. Buss's support.

This whole thing is ridiculous. Once again an owner buys a team in a smaller market, decides they can't afford to operate the team and tries to move it to a MUCH larger market. So lame.. So wrong. It's like buying a house in Rio Linda and trying to move it to Granite Bay.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Anaheim 

Post#9 » by SacKingZZZ » Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:12 am

Call Me Geoff wrote:Orange County is a really large market for the Lakers. It has a huge effect on the value of the Lakers as well. Much like the A's and Giants. I'd be VERY surprised if Jerry Buss didn't resist a Kings move to Anaheim. There is not enough money that would make it worth Dr. Buss's support.

This whole thing is ridiculous. Once again an owner buys a team in a smaller market, decides they can't afford to operate the team and tries to move it to a MUCH larger market. So lame.. So wrong. It's like buying a house in Rio Linda and trying to move it to Granite Bay.



He was already a major roadblock last year. It was said that he was pretty much one of the main reasons that the Maloofs didn't even force the relocation committees hand last april.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Anaheim 

Post#10 » by OGSactownballer » Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:19 pm

Add the upswing of the Clippers to the mix and now you have Sterling in strong opposition as well. With BOTH the current LA owners against, I just cannot ever see ANY team moving in there.
kevin44
Pro Prospect
Posts: 760
And1: 25
Joined: Dec 17, 2003

Re: Anaheim 

Post#11 » by kevin44 » Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:01 pm

The bond to help relocate a team & the remodeling of Honda Center for the NBA I think they have a plan. Samueli didn't become a billionaire by accident. They have a ton of money over there.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Anaheim 

Post#12 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:36 am

But it still comes down to the Maloofs. The question is do they realize that the end result in that deal from Samueli is them losing their team? They don't want to put collateral to refinance their loan at PBP but are basically giving away their team by moving to Anaheim with even more astronomical projections expected than in this Sac deal. With business decisions like that, it's really not so hard to realize why they lost the majority of their wealth.
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Anaheim 

Post#13 » by DEEP3CL » Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:42 am

Hope you guys don't mind if I chip in on this discussion, as far as the two owners here in LA....

Sterling doesn't care, at least not now because he has a team that's 1 profitable and 2 marketable. He can make money off CP and Blake, he never had that in his pocket before. Even when he had the chance to move to the Honda Center years ago, he wouldn't do because he knew the novelty would wear off in a few years. Plus with the putrid teams he had in Staples before this one, he was still making money.

As far as Dr.Buss, I think he was only opposed to it then because he was in talks for the new TV deal, A third team would've lessened the amount of the deal. Now that it's done who knows what his stance is now ?
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.

Return to Sacramento Kings