FreeRon wrote:As we continue to beat this dead horse until there's nothing left of it, I'll point out that we're comparing a player with 5.3 assists/48min and a 2.7 assist:turnover ratio to one with 7.3 assists/48min and a 2.66 assist:turnover ratio. I agree that it appears there are teams that Hill plays better with than Collison. I also think that we would miss Hill MORE than we would miss Collison should either be injured, but by no stretch of the imagination have I seen anything consistently from Collison that would indicate he can't pass. I'm beginning to believe that you have some tie to Lance and you just really want to see him play. It's the only reasonable explanation for why you would take an above-average point guard and make him sound like he couldn't compete in the D-League.
You make good points about the Hill - Collison comparison.
Truth is, we have missed Hill a lot when he was injured. On our 5 game losing streak he was injured and he was also injured in half of our 4 game losing streak as well. It's safe to say that is damn important to us.
In the last few games we've been fine without DC even though I feel that the team does miss him a bit at times. We've still managed to win all of our games with him. But then again we went on a streak without Hill as well simply because we were playing bottom feeders.
Anyway, I believe that every team misses a player when they're injured. It's evident that we've missed both DC and GH but we could probably miss GH more.
Indy2thaWindy wrote:FreeRon wrote:It's the only reasonable explanation for why you would take an above-average point guard
How is being one of the worst starters in the league above-average?
Did you notice that he said above-average point guard and not above-average starting point guard?