Game 66: Los Angeles (40-25) vs New York (34-30)
Re: Game 66: Los Angeles (40-25) vs New York (34-30)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,628
- And1: 2,157
- Joined: Nov 10, 2004
- Location: LAND O NOD
Re: Game 66: Los Angeles (40-25) vs New York (34-30)
btw, your team is REALLY, REALLY fun to watch. If Clipper management can keep that core together, the Lakers may one day soon be the 2nd tier team.
Re: Game 66: Los Angeles (40-25) vs New York (34-30)
- LOJ
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,514
- And1: 7
- Joined: Feb 03, 2011
- Location: Santo Domingo, Rep
Re: Game 66: Los Angeles (40-25) vs New York (34-30)
I'm there with you mk, if it was against the Bulls i'd be rooting for the Knicks as well.
I have a hard time liking that Bulls squad. Joakim Noah nearly reaches Grant Hill levels of annoyance.
I have a hard time liking that Bulls squad. Joakim Noah nearly reaches Grant Hill levels of annoyance.
Re: Game 66: Los Angeles (40-25) vs New York (34-30)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 26,910
- And1: 5,728
- Joined: Dec 18, 2005
-
Re: Game 66: Los Angeles (40-25) vs New York (34-30)
NYKAL wrote:mkwest wrote:The Knicks tried to lose this, but JR Smith didn't get the memo.
not trolling, just want to point out that if the Knicks were trying to lose, why send Chandler back in at the end???
Chandler was in, but Melo, Stat, etc. weren't, even when the game got down to a 1 possession game. If Woody was really serious about playing to win, it wouldn't have gotten to that point. With Orlando and Philly winning, losing certainly didn't hurt the Knicks just as winning didn't necessarily help.
Good luck against the Heat.
Return to Los Angeles Clippers