2012 NBA Playoffs - (2) Thunder vs. (7) Mavs - (2-0 OKC)

odb 7777 · Post #21 » by **odb 7777** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:33 am

Mavs in 6.

Fearthebeard · Post #22 » by **Fearthebeard** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:35 am

James Harden will not let the Thunder lose. Thunder in five.

DEEP3CL · Post #23 » by **DEEP3CL** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:35 am

It's about matchups. Gonna be tough on the Mavs defense this time around, Marion will have his hands full with KD. OKC have too many advantages, but if the Mavs can rebound and control the tempo they can win it. They have to methodically take OKC apart. I can't make a pick at the moment, after seeing Game 1 I'll have a better clue.

PierceFan4ever · Post #24 » by **PierceFan4ever** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:39 am

Thunder in 7

DubOverdose · Post #25 » by **DubOverdose** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:50 am

The way the Mavs have been playing, there's no way the Thunder lose and would probably take it in 5 or 6. However, if the Mavs have just been dicking around (very possible), then they are good enough to compete (based on Mavs' peak this year) and make this a real series.

anish23 · Post #26 » by **anish23** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:54 am

MAVS in 6.

C-izMe · Post #27 » by **C-izMe** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:57 am

Mavs in 6

Iversean · Post #28 » by **Iversean** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:57 am

Go Mavs, though I want to see a LAL/OKC Conference Semis. Don't think the Mavs would win more than 1 game against the Lakers.

GermanFan120 · Post #29 » by **GermanFan120** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:01 am

I am a Mavs fan, and I think OKC will beat us in 5 games.

fallacy · Post #30 » by **fallacy** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:02 am

dream_catcher_9 wrote:
High0ctane21 wrote:
CKRT wrote:Thunder in 6

fallacy · Post #31 » by **fallacy** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:03 am

Unless Dirk goes and has the most efficient playoff series of all-time like he did when these two teams played last year, I don't see the mavs winning.

vw2xb · Post #32 » by **vw2xb** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:05 am

DubOverdose wrote:The way the Mavs have been playing, there's no way the Thunder lose and would probably take it in 5 or 6. However, if the Mavs have just been dicking around (very possible), then they are good enough to compete (based on Mavs' peak this year) and make this a real series.

I seriously hope the Mavs have been dicking around. It's been extremely tough watching them this year.

cs hauser · Post #33 » by **cs hauser** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:11 am

DubOverdose wrote:The way the Mavs have been playing, there's no way the Thunder lose and would probably take it in 5 or 6.

This season, the Thunder are only 8-7 for the month of April. They're not playing particularly well either.

now and 4 life · Post #34 » by **now and 4 life** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:18 am

The Mavs should not have given up Tyson Chandler,. I think they are toast.

Superiorblogman · Post #35 » by **Superiorblogman** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:21 am

Thunder in 6, both teams are overstated this year though.

vinceWin · Post #36 » by **vinceWin** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:23 am

You make Westbrick into a jump shooter and you have Mavs in 6.

theokie · Post #37 » by **theokie** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:23 am

I have zero confidence in the Thunder's ability to win this series

Mavs in 5, again

Shamrock · Post #38 » by **Shamrock** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:25 am

Thunder in 6-7

cs hauser · Post #39 » by **cs hauser** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:29 am

now and 4 life wrote:The Mavs should not have given up Tyson Chandler,. I think they are toast.

So you think the Mavs will be favored to win the NBA Championship if they still had Tyson Chandler?

OKC_is_my_city · Post #40 » by **OKC_is_my_city** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:30 am

theokie wrote:I have zero confidence in the Thunder's ability to win this series

Mavs in 5, again

I agree that Dallas wins the series, however, I think we take them to at least 6 games this time with no Chandler / Barea. I expect Dirk to take a huge dump on us as usual.

Who wins this series and in how many?