JamesNaismith wrote:S.W.A.N wrote:Lawnmower Man wrote:
He's also the oldest player in the draft.
Development between the ages of 18-22 is HUGE.
I think that is a load of crock. There is a reason that the NBA is pushing for increases age limit, so that young guys can develop in college where they are supposed to.
Look at Gereald Green, did coming out early help him ?
Hell look at Amir, did his game develop because he came to NBA early ?
Green didn't develop...he matured (read his draft profile; he always had a ton of talent but not the maturity to utilize it) and Amir works in favor of the point lol. He came into the league young and THEN developed.
Exactly. Green should of stayed in college, Amir should of been in college... the point of college is for these young guys to mature and work or their game while getting an education.
Other than the truly gifted players like a Lebron or a Kobe the majority would be better off in school. And NBA teams would get a better player by having them develop in school not on bench.
I totally understand the concept that drafting the younger player means they have more upside than an older player does.
But when you are talking about a 21 year old kid like he can't develop any more that is just stupid.
Lillard has skills that translate well into the NBA, how well he can develop the rest of his game is what will make the difference between him being an All-star pg or a fringe combo guard in three years.
























