2012 NBA Playoffs - (2) Thunder vs. (7) Mavs - (2-0 OKC)

babycry14 · Post #41 » by **babycry14** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:32 am

odb 7777 wrote:Mavs in 6.

sonicFLAME6 · Post #42 » by **sonicFLAME6** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:36 am

Depends which Dirk decides to show up for the series and if they can get some decent production from their bigs. If the Mavs still had Chandler it would be a whole different story. In taking OKC in 6 as well.

King Of The 4th · Post #43 » by **King Of The 4th** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:38 am

If the Mavs can recapture the shooting they had last year, then Mavs in 6. Otherwise, we'll see the Thunder wrap this series up in 5-6 games.

Stills12 · Post #44 » by **Stills12** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:39 am

Give me 7 games!!!

AshyLarry · Post #45 » by **AshyLarry** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:44 am

OKC is the fav here. if any teams that can beat them is the spurs, the lakers, and the mavs. if the mavs beat them, i think they will beat the hardest team in the PS

Mamba Venom · Post #46 » by **Mamba Venom** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:49 am

2-7 and 4-5 are the best series in both conferences this year. I can't wait.

Payaso · Post #47 » by **Payaso** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:57 am

Im hoping for 7 games.

VINO 24 · Post #48 » by **VINO 24** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:07 am

Mavs in 6

Volcano · Post #49 » by **Volcano** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:10 am

Mavs had a lot of players play above their norm last playoffs..and they were all very hungry. I don't think they'll bring it again.

OKC in 5

smith2373 · Post #50 » by **smith2373** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:13 am

Meant to vote Thunder in 7 but for some reason I voted Mavs in 7.

Sinant · Post #51 » by **Sinant** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:15 am

If Westbrook doesn't get out of his funk, this could be a really ugly series.

I'll still take the Thunder in six games, but there's definitely upset potential in this one.

HotrodBeaubois · Post #52 » by **HotrodBeaubois** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:19 am

DubOverdose wrote:The way the Mavs have been playing, there's no way the Thunder lose and would probably take it in 5 or 6. However, if the Mavs have just been dicking around (very possible), then they are good enough to compete (based on Mavs' peak this year) and make this a real series.

How about the way the Thunder have been playing ? 1-7 against playoff teams in April.

HotrodBeaubois · Post #53 » by **HotrodBeaubois** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:23 am

Mavs in 6!!

Be sure to bring the Championship Belt Durant.

gino_giode · Post #54 » by **gino_giode** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:23 am

Is there a fan bet going on? Like losers have to rock out the other team's avatar.

Wone · Post #55 » by **Wone** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:25 am

HotrodBeaubois wrote:
DubOverdose wrote:The way the Mavs have been playing, there's no way the Thunder lose and would probably take it in 5 or 6. However, if the Mavs have just been dicking around (very possible), then they are good enough to compete (based on Mavs' peak this year) and make this a real series.

How about the way the Thunder have been playing ? 1-7 against playoff teams in April.

that doesn't mean much.

the 2010 lakers went 12-10 in their last 22 games, playing just above .500 ball. going 3-8 against playoff teams in that stretch. they won the title.

sometimes teams just mess around or rest their guys or whatever.

RvM · Post #56 » by **RvM** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:32 am

It's funny how everyone but Mavs fans are declaring that the Mavs are going to win.

We are all seriously underestimating OKC. I think it's going to be a really epic series. the homer in me says Mavs in 7, but I'd go OKC in 6 as the real bet.

Insanity91 · Post #57 » by **Insanity91** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:37 am

Mavs in 6.

Edrees · Post #58 » by **Edrees** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:38 am

OKC in 7

HotrodBeaubois · Post #59 » by **HotrodBeaubois** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:38 am

Wone wrote:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:
DubOverdose wrote:The way the Mavs have been playing, there's no way the Thunder lose and would probably take it in 5 or 6. However, if the Mavs have just been dicking around (very possible), then they are good enough to compete (based on Mavs' peak this year) and make this a real series.

How about the way the Thunder have been playing ? 1-7 against playoff teams in April.

that doesn't mean much.

the 2010 lakers went 12-10 in their last 22 games, playing just above .500 ball. going 3-8 against playoff teams in that stretch. they won the title.

sometimes teams just mess around or rest their guys or whatever.

But that wasn't the case here. OKC have been playing for the #1 seed so to say they weren't trying to win down the stretch is Laughable!! Yeah the Thunder were resting their guys lastnight when Westbrook played 34 Minutes and Durant 40 Minutes in a Loss to Denver @ Home.

HotrodBeaubois · Post #60 » by **HotrodBeaubois** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:43 am

Wone wrote:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:
DubOverdose wrote:The way the Mavs have been playing, there's no way the Thunder lose and would probably take it in 5 or 6. However, if the Mavs have just been dicking around (very possible), then they are good enough to compete (based on Mavs' peak this year) and make this a real series.

How about the way the Thunder have been playing ? 1-7 against playoff teams in April.

that doesn't mean much.

the 2010 lakers went 12-10 in their last 22 games, playing just above .500 ball. going 3-8 against playoff teams in that stretch. they won the title.

sometimes teams just mess around or rest their guys or whatever.

The Lakers were coasting because they had already locked up the the #1 seed in the west.

Who wins this series and in how many?