MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:People do realize the Bulls would've been up by 20 over the Bucks so D-Rose wouldn't of been playing/got injured, right?
The Bucks couldn't even beat the Pacers, 76ers or whatever average team to make the playoffs. What makes people all of a sudden think they can beat a really good Bulls sans Rose team?
The Bulls needed last second shot by Rose to beat us the last time we played. We lost close games to Knicks or Pacers too. Our main problem was that we didn't know how to close games in clutch. The Bulls were up what 12 when Rose was injured. You don't think we would be that close if we played against them? You are clueless if you do.




















